‘No One Likes Us’: Football, Identity, and Belonging in Post-Industrial London

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 Q4 AREA STUDIES London Journal Pub Date : 2022-08-17 DOI:10.1080/03058034.2022.2058788
Ole Jensen
{"title":"‘No One Likes Us’: Football, Identity, and Belonging in Post-Industrial London","authors":"Ole Jensen","doi":"10.1080/03058034.2022.2058788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the role of Millwall FC as a reference point for a working-class population feeling increasingly marginalised in the post-industrial city. The analysis is framed by, respectively, Sandra Wallman’s continuum between open and closed urban systems, developed in the 1980s, and Edward Soja’s concept of a multi-scalar view that offers an understanding of smaller geographical areas within a wider urban context. Overall, it can be argued that post-industrial dynamics, in particular the loss of industrial, inner-city employment and changes to housing stock and tenure patterns, have triggered a general move towards more open urban systems, thereby challenging the continued relevance of the open–closed continuum. With the closed system still existing in small ‘pockets’ of memories and nostalgia, Millwall fan culture represents one of few remaining closed systems, keeping alive memories of the docklands, and with Millwall support as a ‘blood tradition’, practiced across generations. But it is very much a pocket of the past. Where Millwall emerged as a club of its immediate neighbourhoods, this geographical area is now characterised by widespread gentrification and a rapidly increasing BAME population. With an increasing proportion of Millwall fans now located in Kent, Millwall FC has come to represent a last working-class bastion in South London.","PeriodicalId":43904,"journal":{"name":"London Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"London Journal","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03058034.2022.2058788","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the role of Millwall FC as a reference point for a working-class population feeling increasingly marginalised in the post-industrial city. The analysis is framed by, respectively, Sandra Wallman’s continuum between open and closed urban systems, developed in the 1980s, and Edward Soja’s concept of a multi-scalar view that offers an understanding of smaller geographical areas within a wider urban context. Overall, it can be argued that post-industrial dynamics, in particular the loss of industrial, inner-city employment and changes to housing stock and tenure patterns, have triggered a general move towards more open urban systems, thereby challenging the continued relevance of the open–closed continuum. With the closed system still existing in small ‘pockets’ of memories and nostalgia, Millwall fan culture represents one of few remaining closed systems, keeping alive memories of the docklands, and with Millwall support as a ‘blood tradition’, practiced across generations. But it is very much a pocket of the past. Where Millwall emerged as a club of its immediate neighbourhoods, this geographical area is now characterised by widespread gentrification and a rapidly increasing BAME population. With an increasing proportion of Millwall fans now located in Kent, Millwall FC has come to represent a last working-class bastion in South London.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“没人喜欢我们”:后工业时代伦敦的足球、身份和归属感
本文探讨了米尔沃尔足球俱乐部作为工人阶级在后工业城市中日益边缘化的参考点的作用。分析的框架分别是Sandra Wallman在20世纪80年代提出的开放和封闭城市系统之间的连续体,以及Edward Soja的多标量视图概念,该概念提供了在更广泛的城市背景下对较小地理区域的理解。总的来说,可以认为后工业动态,特别是工业和城市内部就业的丧失以及住房存量和保有模式的变化,已经引发了向更开放的城市系统的普遍趋势,从而挑战了开放-封闭连续体的继续相关性。由于封闭的系统仍然存在于记忆和怀旧的小“口袋”中,米尔沃尔的球迷文化代表了少数剩余的封闭系统之一,保留了对港口区的鲜活记忆,并且在米尔沃尔的支持下,作为一种“血脉传统”,代代相传。但它在很大程度上是过去的一个口袋。米尔沃尔作为其邻近社区的俱乐部出现,这个地理区域现在的特点是广泛的中产阶级化和快速增长的BAME人口。随着越来越多的米尔沃尔球迷现在定居在肯特郡,米尔沃尔足球俱乐部已经成为南伦敦最后一个工人阶级的堡垒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
London Journal
London Journal Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The scope of The London Journal is broad, embracing all aspects of metropolitan society past and present, including comparative studies. The Journal is multi-disciplinary and is intended to interest all concerned with the understanding and enrichment of London and Londoners: historians, geographers, economists, sociologists, social workers, political scientists, planners, educationalist, archaeologists, conservationists, architects, and all those taking an interest in the fine and performing arts, the natural environment and in commentaries on metropolitan life in fiction as in fact
期刊最新文献
Designs on Democracy: Architecture and the Public in Interwar London Designs on Democracy: Architecture and the Public in Interwar London . By N eal S hasore . Pp. xxvii + 432 + 142 illustrations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. £71.00. ISBN 978-0-19-284972-4. Hardback. Vagabonds: Life on the Streets of Nineteenth-Century London Vagabonds: Life on the Streets of Nineteenth-Century London . By O skar J ensen . Pp. 352. London: Duckworth Books, 2022. £20.00. ISBN 978071564392. Hardback. A Network of Contacts: Metropolitan Influences in the Delivery of Poor Relief in the London Hinterland (1778–1785) London Marine Insurance, 1438–1824: Risk, Trade, and the Early Modern State Nicholas Barbon: Developing London, 1667–1698
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1