An epistemic proxy war? Popular communication, epistemic contestations and violent conflict in Ethiopia

IF 1.5 Q2 COMMUNICATION Popular Communication Pub Date : 2022-05-16 DOI:10.1080/15405702.2022.2074998
Matti Pohjonen
{"title":"An epistemic proxy war? Popular communication, epistemic contestations and violent conflict in Ethiopia","authors":"Matti Pohjonen","doi":"10.1080/15405702.2022.2074998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper highlights an understudied perspective on post-truth ideas in online popular communication through an examination of online popular communication during the Ethiopian conflict (or the Tigray War). It argues, in particular, that the epistemic contestations characteristic of the hybrid media environment needs to always be understood as double-layered: contemporary digital media functions both as a site where such contestations can be researched but, at the same time, the theories and frameworks of knowledge we use to articulate the debates need to be also critically contested theories originating from the West not necessarily valid in other parts of the world without critical examination. To specify the theoretical arguments made, the paper will use a mixed-method analysis that combines digital ethnographic research with a large-scale analysis of visual imagery shared on Twitter to understand popular communication and propaganda during the conflict/war.","PeriodicalId":45584,"journal":{"name":"Popular Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Popular Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2022.2074998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper highlights an understudied perspective on post-truth ideas in online popular communication through an examination of online popular communication during the Ethiopian conflict (or the Tigray War). It argues, in particular, that the epistemic contestations characteristic of the hybrid media environment needs to always be understood as double-layered: contemporary digital media functions both as a site where such contestations can be researched but, at the same time, the theories and frameworks of knowledge we use to articulate the debates need to be also critically contested theories originating from the West not necessarily valid in other parts of the world without critical examination. To specify the theoretical arguments made, the paper will use a mixed-method analysis that combines digital ethnographic research with a large-scale analysis of visual imagery shared on Twitter to understand popular communication and propaganda during the conflict/war.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一场认知上的代理人战争?埃塞俄比亚的大众交流、认知争论和暴力冲突
摘要本文通过对埃塞俄比亚冲突(或提格雷战争)期间的网络大众传播的考察,强调了对网络大众传播中后真相思想研究不足的观点。它特别认为,混合媒体环境的认知争论特征需要始终被理解为双层的:当代数字媒体既是一个可以研究这种争论的场所,我们用来阐明辩论的理论和知识框架也需要是来自西方的有争议的理论,如果没有批判性的检验,这些理论在世界其他地区不一定有效。为了具体说明所提出的理论论点,本文将使用混合方法分析,将数字人种学研究与推特上分享的视觉图像的大规模分析相结合,以了解冲突/战争期间的大众传播和宣传。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Popular Communication
Popular Communication COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Video game characters and transmedia storytelling. The dynamic game character, A big little fiction form: last decade of production and circulation of made-for-TV movies in Europe Unspooled: how the cassette made music sharable Mourning the greatest: “unforgivably black” and peacefully Muslim Muhammad Ali Making fandom great again: silencing discussions of racism in reactionary and transformative fandoms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1