Deconstructing the Dow Jones Industrial Average

Jacky Lin, Genevieve Selden, J. Shoven, Clemens Sialm
{"title":"Deconstructing the Dow Jones Industrial Average","authors":"Jacky Lin, Genevieve Selden, J. Shoven, Clemens Sialm","doi":"10.3905/jwm.2022.1.188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) has historically been the most recognized stock index in the United States. It has several unique features. It uses price weights, it ignores cash dividend payments, and it also treats stock dividends, rights issues, and other corporate actions inconsistently. We show that price indices that use alternative weighting methods and more systematic inclusion criteria perform similarly to the DJIA. However, ignoring cash and stock dividends underestimates the long-run returns earned by stock market investors dramatically. If the DJIA had consistently adjusted for dividends and other corporate actions since 1928, the index would have closed at 1,113,047 instead of 28,538 points at the end of 2019.","PeriodicalId":39998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wealth Management","volume":"25 1","pages":"120 - 142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wealth Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2022.1.188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) has historically been the most recognized stock index in the United States. It has several unique features. It uses price weights, it ignores cash dividend payments, and it also treats stock dividends, rights issues, and other corporate actions inconsistently. We show that price indices that use alternative weighting methods and more systematic inclusion criteria perform similarly to the DJIA. However, ignoring cash and stock dividends underestimates the long-run returns earned by stock market investors dramatically. If the DJIA had consistently adjusted for dividends and other corporate actions since 1928, the index would have closed at 1,113,047 instead of 28,538 points at the end of 2019.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解构道琼斯工业平均指数
道琼斯工业平均指数(DJIA)历来是美国最受认可的股票指数。它有几个独特的特点。它使用的是价格权重,忽略了现金股息支付,而且它对待股票股息、配股和其他公司行为的态度也不一致。我们表明,使用替代加权方法和更系统的纳入标准的价格指数的表现与道琼斯工业平均指数相似。然而,忽略现金和股票股息大大低估了股市投资者获得的长期回报。如果道琼斯工业平均指数自1928年以来一直根据股息和其他公司行为进行调整,那么该指数将在2019年底收于1,113,047点,而不是28,538点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wealth Management
Journal of Wealth Management Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
The Safe-Haven and Hedging Properties of Agricultural Commodities Editor’s Letter Adding Art to Your Portfolio: A New Risk Assessment Framework Corporate Ownership of Fine Art: Firm Valuation, Societal Impacts, and Philanthropy Asset Allocation—Commodities or Commodity Stocks?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1