Intra-party decision-making in contemporary Europe: improving representation or ruling with empty shells?

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Irish Political Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-04 DOI:10.1080/07907184.2022.2046430
S. Scarrow, P. Webb, Thomas Poguntke
{"title":"Intra-party decision-making in contemporary Europe: improving representation or ruling with empty shells?","authors":"S. Scarrow, P. Webb, Thomas Poguntke","doi":"10.1080/07907184.2022.2046430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Political observers agree that parties in European parliamentary democracies are more likely than previously to give party members opportunities to vote in decisions about party policies or personnel. Observers are less agreed about the implications of these apparent procedural trends. Some, including Peter Mair, saw them as evidence of the hollowing-out of party democracies; others have seen them as enhancing citizens’ opportunities for meaningful political participation. Because this is ultimately an empirical question as well as a normative one, these radically conflicting interpretations make it crucial to examine which interpretation is best supported by usage to date This is the task we undertake in this article. We use data from the Political Party Database Project (PPDB) to investigate the extent to which parties in 26 European countries have adopted and employed intra-party ballots. We also ask whether there is evidence that such procedures are changing intra-party relationships. We find that balloting of party members is indeed widely used, but it is by no means universal. We find much less support for the implication that such ballots are associated with less competitive contests, or that the new devices are generally used in ways that devalue party-member bonds.","PeriodicalId":45746,"journal":{"name":"Irish Political Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Political Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2022.2046430","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Political observers agree that parties in European parliamentary democracies are more likely than previously to give party members opportunities to vote in decisions about party policies or personnel. Observers are less agreed about the implications of these apparent procedural trends. Some, including Peter Mair, saw them as evidence of the hollowing-out of party democracies; others have seen them as enhancing citizens’ opportunities for meaningful political participation. Because this is ultimately an empirical question as well as a normative one, these radically conflicting interpretations make it crucial to examine which interpretation is best supported by usage to date This is the task we undertake in this article. We use data from the Political Party Database Project (PPDB) to investigate the extent to which parties in 26 European countries have adopted and employed intra-party ballots. We also ask whether there is evidence that such procedures are changing intra-party relationships. We find that balloting of party members is indeed widely used, but it is by no means universal. We find much less support for the implication that such ballots are associated with less competitive contests, or that the new devices are generally used in ways that devalue party-member bonds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当代欧洲的党内决策:提高代表性还是空壳执政?
政治观察家一致认为,欧洲议会民主制的政党比以前更有可能给党员投票决定政党政策或人事的机会。观察员们对这些明显的程序趋势的影响不太一致。包括彼得·梅尔(Peter maair)在内的一些人将其视为党派民主空心化的证据;其他人则认为,它们增加了公民有意义的政治参与机会。因为这最终是一个经验问题,也是一个规范问题,这些根本冲突的解释使得检验哪种解释最能得到迄今为止用法的支持至关重要。这是我们在本文中承担的任务。我们使用政党数据库项目(PPDB)的数据来调查26个欧洲国家的政党采用和使用党内投票的程度。我们还想知道,是否有证据表明这些程序正在改变党内关系。我们发现党员投票确实是广泛使用的,但绝不是普遍使用的。我们发现很少有人支持这种暗示,即这种选票与竞争不那么激烈的竞选有关,或者这种新设备通常被用于削弱党员之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Political Studies
Irish Political Studies POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
28.60%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Industry and policy in independent Ireland, 1922–1972 Industry and policy in independent Ireland, 1922–1972 , by Frank Barry, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2023, 256pp., £70.00/€83.00 (print), £58.00/€70.00 (ebook), ISBN: 0198878230 ‘It is only by political means that we can hope for … success’: Éamon de Valera’s long climb back to power, 1922–32 Obstetric violence and consent during pregnancy and childbirth: the Eighth Amendment and its impact on the Irish maternity system Mistrust: conservative rhetoric in the Oireachtas 2018 abortion debates Direct democracy and party behaviour in the Republic of Ireland: a campaign finance perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1