Unlawful Administrative Act: Indonesian Administrative Law Perspective

Putu Gede Arya Sumerta Yasa, Wita Setyaningrum, Kadek Agus Sudiarawan
{"title":"Unlawful Administrative Act: Indonesian Administrative Law Perspective","authors":"Putu Gede Arya Sumerta Yasa, Wita Setyaningrum, Kadek Agus Sudiarawan","doi":"10.31603/variajusticia.v17i2.5172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze and examine the meaning of unlawful acts by government officials and the authority of state administrative courts in dealing with cases related to unlawful acts by government officials. This study was normative legal research using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The primary legal materials uses in this study including Indonesian Civil Code (Burgerlijk Wetboek), Supreme Court Regulation (hereinafter PERMA) Number 2 of 2019 concerning Guidelines For Dispute Settlement Of Government Actions and Authority to Hearing Unlawful Acts By A Government Board And Government Officer (onrechtmatige overheidsdaad) and Law No. 51 of 2009 concerning the second amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court to analyses substance related to the meaning of unlawful acts by government officials and the authority of state administrative courts in dealing with cases related to unlawful acts by government officials in accordance with prevailing law. The conceptual approach taken from the meaning of onrechmatigedaad in Burgerlijk Wetboek. This study indicated that the dispute settlement on the unlawful act by the government official mentioned on the Supreme Court regulation (hereinafter PERMA) number 2 of 2019 including dispute settlement process, which shall be file through state administrative court. which stipulates that the authority to hearing the disputes of unlawful acts by the government board or the government officials can be resolved through the state administrative judiciary.","PeriodicalId":31904,"journal":{"name":"Varia Justicia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Varia Justicia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31603/variajusticia.v17i2.5172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and examine the meaning of unlawful acts by government officials and the authority of state administrative courts in dealing with cases related to unlawful acts by government officials. This study was normative legal research using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The primary legal materials uses in this study including Indonesian Civil Code (Burgerlijk Wetboek), Supreme Court Regulation (hereinafter PERMA) Number 2 of 2019 concerning Guidelines For Dispute Settlement Of Government Actions and Authority to Hearing Unlawful Acts By A Government Board And Government Officer (onrechtmatige overheidsdaad) and Law No. 51 of 2009 concerning the second amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court to analyses substance related to the meaning of unlawful acts by government officials and the authority of state administrative courts in dealing with cases related to unlawful acts by government officials in accordance with prevailing law. The conceptual approach taken from the meaning of onrechmatigedaad in Burgerlijk Wetboek. This study indicated that the dispute settlement on the unlawful act by the government official mentioned on the Supreme Court regulation (hereinafter PERMA) number 2 of 2019 including dispute settlement process, which shall be file through state administrative court. which stipulates that the authority to hearing the disputes of unlawful acts by the government board or the government officials can be resolved through the state administrative judiciary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非法行政行为:印尼行政法视角
本研究旨在分析和检验政府官员违法行为的含义以及国家行政法院在处理与政府官员违法违规行为有关的案件时的权力。本研究采用了法定方法和概念方法进行规范性法律研究。本研究使用的主要法律材料包括《印度尼西亚民法典》(Burgerlijk Wetboek),最高法院条例(以下简称PERMA)2019年第2号关于政府行为争议解决指南和政府委员会和政府官员审理非法行为的权力(onrechtmatige overheidsdad),以及2009年第51号法律,涉及1986年第5号法律的第二次修正案,该法律涉及国家行政法院分析与政府官员违法行为的含义以及国家行政法院根据现行法律处理与政府官员违法违规行为有关的案件的权力。概念方法取自Burgerlijk Wetboek中onrechmatigedaad的含义。本研究表明,最高法院2019年第2号法规(以下简称PERMA)中提到的政府官员违法行为的争议解决包括争议解决程序,该程序应通过国家行政法院提交。其中规定,审理政府委员会或政府官员违法行为争议的权力可以通过国家行政司法机构解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Police Brutality as Human Rights Violation: A Study Case of Black Lives Matter Legal Reconstruction of Indonesian Banking Laws: Challenges and Opportunities for Digital Bank Regulation Government Capacity to Guarantee Halal Product from Micro, Small, And Medium Enterprises in Kebumen Environmental Court and Principle of Good Environmental Governance in Enforcing Environmental Law Technology Company Merger and Acquisition: a Study of Indonesian and European Union Competition Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1