Socio-economic modeling of the effect of smokers’ transition to smokeless technologies

N. Koryagina, A. Zhigulev, A. N. Zabotina, R. Dreval, K. Y. Muravyeva
{"title":"Socio-economic modeling of the effect of smokers’ transition to smokeless technologies","authors":"N. Koryagina, A. Zhigulev, A. N. Zabotina, R. Dreval, K. Y. Muravyeva","doi":"10.17650/1818-8338-2022-16-3-k672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research objective: Quantitative estimation of social-demographic and social-economic impact of the switch of traditional cigarettes smoking to modified risk tobacco products consumption, based on effect upon smoking-related mortality and diseases rates.Methods. Target group – consumers of smoking tobacco: conventional cigarettes (CC) and modified risk tobacco products (MRTP). Base of calculations – analysis of available time series for: CC and MRTP consumption, life expectancy and healthy life expectancy coefficients, statistics on smoking-related mortality and diseases rates, including data on key nosologies (malignant neoplasms of respiratory system, digestive organs, urinary tract; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; circulatory diseases; cerebrovascular diseases.Results. We implemented prognoses for all the above mentioned parameters to year 2035, calculated direct medical and indirect costs for demographic and economic loss with attention to budget impact analysis, developed five scenarios based on different CC and MRTP consumption.The model of switching from CC to MRTP consumption proves a significant decline of demographic and economic burden even with rather modest MRTP replacement for CC. With current practices of switching from CC to MRTP remaining, during 2021–2035 summary impact would result in 3.6 mln of years saved, 7.7 mln of healthy years saved, 120 thous. of mortal cases and 345 thous. diseases cases prevented. The economic burden would be 3.3 trillion rubles lower.Conclusion. Smoking cessation is the optimal method to reduce health risks, and state policy for stimulation of smoking quitting is necessary. Along with that, transition from CC to MRTP may be an alternative way to reduce health risks for those smokers with long smoking history and either psychological or physiological causes who cannot quit smoking.Even small in the terms of percent transition from CC to MRTP may result in significant decrease of demographic and economic burden on the national scale.","PeriodicalId":82998,"journal":{"name":"The Clinician","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Clinician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/1818-8338-2022-16-3-k672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research objective: Quantitative estimation of social-demographic and social-economic impact of the switch of traditional cigarettes smoking to modified risk tobacco products consumption, based on effect upon smoking-related mortality and diseases rates.Methods. Target group – consumers of smoking tobacco: conventional cigarettes (CC) and modified risk tobacco products (MRTP). Base of calculations – analysis of available time series for: CC and MRTP consumption, life expectancy and healthy life expectancy coefficients, statistics on smoking-related mortality and diseases rates, including data on key nosologies (malignant neoplasms of respiratory system, digestive organs, urinary tract; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; circulatory diseases; cerebrovascular diseases.Results. We implemented prognoses for all the above mentioned parameters to year 2035, calculated direct medical and indirect costs for demographic and economic loss with attention to budget impact analysis, developed five scenarios based on different CC and MRTP consumption.The model of switching from CC to MRTP consumption proves a significant decline of demographic and economic burden even with rather modest MRTP replacement for CC. With current practices of switching from CC to MRTP remaining, during 2021–2035 summary impact would result in 3.6 mln of years saved, 7.7 mln of healthy years saved, 120 thous. of mortal cases and 345 thous. diseases cases prevented. The economic burden would be 3.3 trillion rubles lower.Conclusion. Smoking cessation is the optimal method to reduce health risks, and state policy for stimulation of smoking quitting is necessary. Along with that, transition from CC to MRTP may be an alternative way to reduce health risks for those smokers with long smoking history and either psychological or physiological causes who cannot quit smoking.Even small in the terms of percent transition from CC to MRTP may result in significant decrease of demographic and economic burden on the national scale.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吸烟者向无烟技术过渡影响的社会经济模型
研究目标:基于对吸烟相关死亡率和疾病率的影响,定量估计从传统吸烟转向改良风险烟草制品消费的社会人口和社会经济影响。方法。目标群体——吸烟消费者:传统香烟(CC)和改良风险烟草产品(MRTP)。计算基础——分析可用的时间序列:CC和MRTP消费、预期寿命和健康预期寿命系数、吸烟相关死亡率和疾病率统计数据,包括关键术语的数据(呼吸系统、消化器官、泌尿道的恶性肿瘤;慢性阻塞性肺病;循环系统疾病;脑血管疾病。结果。我们对上述所有参数进行了到2035年的预测,计算了人口和经济损失的直接医疗和间接成本,并注意预算影响分析,制定了五种情景根据不同的CC和MRTP消耗。从CC转换为MRTP消费的模型证明,即使用适度的MRTP替代CC,人口和经济负担也会显著下降。在目前从CC转换到MRTP的做法仍然存在的情况下,在2021年至2035年期间,汇总影响将导致360万年的节省,770万年的健康节省,12万年。死亡病例和34.5万例。预防疾病病例。经济负担将减少3.3万亿卢布。结论戒烟是降低健康风险的最佳方法,国家鼓励戒烟的政策是必要的。除此之外,从CC到MRTP的过渡可能是降低那些有长期吸烟史且因心理或生理原因无法戒烟的吸烟者健康风险的另一种方法。从CC到MRTP的过渡百分比即使很小,也可能导致全国范围内人口和经济负担的显著减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Back pain in young people: approaches to diagnosis and treatment Cardiovascular risk in patients with inflammatory arthritis Diagnosis and treatment of vascular cognitive disorders TAFRO syndrome associated with C3 nephropathy (an analysis of clinical experience) Interstitial lung disease in patients with systemic scleroderma: approaches to predicting lesion volume
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1