The evolution of modern cosmology as seen through a personal walk across six decades

IF 0.8 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE The European Physical Journal H Pub Date : 2018-02-22 DOI:10.1140/epjh/e2017-80048-5
Jayant V. Narlikar
{"title":"The evolution of modern cosmology as seen through a personal walk across six decades","authors":"Jayant V. Narlikar","doi":"10.1140/epjh/e2017-80048-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>\nThis highly personal account of evolution of cosmology spans a period of approximately six decades 1959–2017. It begins when in 1959 the author, as an undergraduate at Cambridge, was attracted to the subject by the thought provoking lectures by Fred Hoyle as well as by his popular books <i>The Nature of Universe and The Frontiers of Astronomy</i>. The result was that after a successful performance at the <i>Mathematical Tripos</i> (Part III) examination, he enrolled as a research student of Hoyle. In this article the author describes the interesting works in cosmology that kept him busy both in Cambridge and in India. The issues pertinent to cosmological research in the 1960s and 1970s included the Mach’s principle, the Wheeler-Feynman theory relating the local electromagnetic arrow of time to the cosmological one, the observational tests of specific expanding universe models, and issues like singularity in quantum cosmology. However, post-1965, the nature of cosmological research changed dramatically with the discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR). Given the assumption that the CMBR is a relic of big bang there has been a host of papers on the early universe, going as close to the big bang as the very early universe would permit: around just 10<sup>?36</sup> s. The author argues that despite the popularity of the standard hot big bang cosmology (SBBC) it rests on rather shaky foundations. On the theoretical side there is no well established physical framework to support the SBBC; nor is there independent observational support for its assumptions like the nonbaryonic dark matter, inflation and dark energy. While technological progress has made it possible to explore the universe in greater detail with open mind, today’s cosmologists seem caught in a range of speculations in support of the big bang dogma. Thus, in modern times cosmology appears to have lost the Camelot spirit encouraging adventurous studies of the unknown. A spirit of openness is advocated to restore cosmology to its rightful position as the flagship of astronomy.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":791,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal H","volume":"43 1","pages":"43 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80048-5","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Physical Journal H","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80048-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This highly personal account of evolution of cosmology spans a period of approximately six decades 1959–2017. It begins when in 1959 the author, as an undergraduate at Cambridge, was attracted to the subject by the thought provoking lectures by Fred Hoyle as well as by his popular books The Nature of Universe and The Frontiers of Astronomy. The result was that after a successful performance at the Mathematical Tripos (Part III) examination, he enrolled as a research student of Hoyle. In this article the author describes the interesting works in cosmology that kept him busy both in Cambridge and in India. The issues pertinent to cosmological research in the 1960s and 1970s included the Mach’s principle, the Wheeler-Feynman theory relating the local electromagnetic arrow of time to the cosmological one, the observational tests of specific expanding universe models, and issues like singularity in quantum cosmology. However, post-1965, the nature of cosmological research changed dramatically with the discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR). Given the assumption that the CMBR is a relic of big bang there has been a host of papers on the early universe, going as close to the big bang as the very early universe would permit: around just 10?36 s. The author argues that despite the popularity of the standard hot big bang cosmology (SBBC) it rests on rather shaky foundations. On the theoretical side there is no well established physical framework to support the SBBC; nor is there independent observational support for its assumptions like the nonbaryonic dark matter, inflation and dark energy. While technological progress has made it possible to explore the universe in greater detail with open mind, today’s cosmologists seem caught in a range of speculations in support of the big bang dogma. Thus, in modern times cosmology appears to have lost the Camelot spirit encouraging adventurous studies of the unknown. A spirit of openness is advocated to restore cosmology to its rightful position as the flagship of astronomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代宇宙学的演变,通过个人走过六十年
这本对宇宙学演化的高度个人化的描述跨越了1959年至2017年大约60年的时间。1959年,作为剑桥大学的一名本科生,作者被弗雷德·霍伊尔发人深省的讲座以及他的畅销书《宇宙的本质》和《天文学的前沿》所吸引,对这一主题产生了兴趣。结果是,在数学博士学位(第三部分)考试中取得成功后,他被霍伊尔大学录取为一名研究生。在这篇文章中,作者描述了让他在剑桥和印度都很忙的有趣的宇宙学工作。20世纪60年代和70年代与宇宙学研究相关的问题包括马赫原理、惠勒-费曼理论(惠勒-费曼理论将局部电磁时间箭头与宇宙时间箭头联系起来)、特定膨胀宇宙模型的观测测试,以及量子宇宙学中的奇点等问题。然而,1965年后,随着宇宙微波背景辐射(CMBR)的发现,宇宙学研究的性质发生了巨大变化。假设CMBR是大爆炸的遗迹,已经有大量关于早期宇宙的论文,在非常早期的宇宙允许的范围内尽可能接近大爆炸:大约只有10?36。作者认为,尽管标准热大爆炸宇宙论(SBBC)很受欢迎,但它建立在相当不稳定的基础上。在理论方面,没有一个很好的物理框架来支持SBBC;它的假设也没有独立的观测支持,比如非重子暗物质、暴胀和暗能量。虽然科技的进步使得以开放的心态更详细地探索宇宙成为可能,但今天的宇宙学家似乎陷入了支持大爆炸教条的一系列猜测之中。因此,在现代,宇宙学似乎已经失去了鼓励对未知进行冒险研究的卡米洛特精神。提倡开放的精神,以恢复宇宙学作为天文学旗舰的应有地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The European Physical Journal H
The European Physical Journal H HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of this journal is to catalyse, foster, and disseminate an awareness and understanding of the historical development of ideas in contemporary physics, and more generally, ideas about how Nature works. The scope explicitly includes: - Contributions addressing the history of physics and of physical ideas and concepts, the interplay of physics and mathematics as well as the natural sciences, and the history and philosophy of sciences, together with discussions of experimental ideas and designs - inasmuch as they clearly relate, and preferably add, to the understanding of modern physics. - Annotated and/or contextual translations of relevant foreign-language texts. - Careful characterisations of old and/or abandoned ideas including past mistakes and false leads, thereby helping working physicists to assess how compelling contemporary ideas may turn out to be in future, i.e. with hindsight.
期刊最新文献
Equilibria and the protomodel of the Sun’s atmosphere by Karl Schwarzschild in hindsight A commented translation of Boltzmann’s work, “Ueber die sogenannte H-Curve.” Bohr and von Neumann on the universality of quantum mechanics: materials for the history of the quantum measurement process From history of physics to “history for physics” The drama of ideas in the history of quantum gravity: Niels Bohr, Lev Landau, and Matvei Bronstein
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1