Investigating the effect of the CPOT-based pain management program on the pain intensity and dose adjustment of analgesics in mechanically ventilated patients: A randomized clinical trial

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING Nursing Practice Today Pub Date : 2023-08-18 DOI:10.18502/npt.v10i3.13430
Fatemeh Kouhi, R. Froutan, Ahmad Bagheri Moghaddam
{"title":"Investigating the effect of the CPOT-based pain management program on the pain intensity and dose adjustment of analgesics in mechanically ventilated patients: A randomized clinical trial","authors":"Fatemeh Kouhi, R. Froutan, Ahmad Bagheri Moghaddam","doi":"10.18502/npt.v10i3.13430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Aim: This research was conducted to determine the effect of a pain management program based on the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) on the pain intensity and adjusting the dosage of analgesics in mechanically ventilated patients hospitalized in intensive care units. \nMethods & Materials: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted during 2019-2022 on 70 mechanically ventilated patients admitted to ICUs of the Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad, Iran. In the intervention group, patients' pain intensity was measured during endotracheal suctioning using CPOT. Then the dosage of analgesics was adjusted based on the assessed pain level. The pain level was evaluated in the control group according to the department's routine. Data were analyzed using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (RMANOVA). \nResults: CPOT and BPS showed a strong correlation (r>0.9, Pvalue<0.001) between the two pain intensity instruments. Based on the results of RMANOVA, a significant trend of pain intensity measures was observed during all three suctions (measurement effect P<0.05), which was different between the two groups (interaction effect P<0.05). The Sidak post hoc test results showed a significant difference in pain intensity measures between the intervention and control groups during all three suctions and 5 and 15 minutes after suctions (all P-values<0.05). Also, significant intervention effects were observed regarding the amount of analgesics prescribed in terms of total fentanyl blouse, total infused Fentanyl, and total Fentanyl (all P-values<0.05). \nConclusion: Using CPOT is a positive step in the evaluation and control of dosage adjustment of analgesic medications for patients with mechanical ventilation.","PeriodicalId":36883,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Practice Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Practice Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/npt.v10i3.13430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Aim: This research was conducted to determine the effect of a pain management program based on the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) on the pain intensity and adjusting the dosage of analgesics in mechanically ventilated patients hospitalized in intensive care units. Methods & Materials: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted during 2019-2022 on 70 mechanically ventilated patients admitted to ICUs of the Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad, Iran. In the intervention group, patients' pain intensity was measured during endotracheal suctioning using CPOT. Then the dosage of analgesics was adjusted based on the assessed pain level. The pain level was evaluated in the control group according to the department's routine. Data were analyzed using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (RMANOVA). Results: CPOT and BPS showed a strong correlation (r>0.9, Pvalue<0.001) between the two pain intensity instruments. Based on the results of RMANOVA, a significant trend of pain intensity measures was observed during all three suctions (measurement effect P<0.05), which was different between the two groups (interaction effect P<0.05). The Sidak post hoc test results showed a significant difference in pain intensity measures between the intervention and control groups during all three suctions and 5 and 15 minutes after suctions (all P-values<0.05). Also, significant intervention effects were observed regarding the amount of analgesics prescribed in terms of total fentanyl blouse, total infused Fentanyl, and total Fentanyl (all P-values<0.05). Conclusion: Using CPOT is a positive step in the evaluation and control of dosage adjustment of analgesic medications for patients with mechanical ventilation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于CPOT的疼痛管理方案对机械通气患者疼痛强度和镇痛药剂量调整的影响:一项随机临床试验
背景与目的:本研究旨在探讨基于重症监护疼痛观察工具(CPOT)的疼痛管理方案对重症监护病房机械通气患者疼痛强度及镇痛药剂量调整的影响。方法与材料:本随机对照临床试验于2019-2022年对伊朗马什哈德伊玛目礼萨医院icu收治的70例机械通气患者进行研究。干预组采用CPOT法测量患者在气管内吸痰过程中的疼痛强度。然后根据评估的疼痛程度调整镇痛药的剂量。对照组参照科室常规评估疼痛程度。数据分析采用双向重复测量方差分析(RMANOVA)。结果:CPOT与BPS在两种疼痛强度指标间具有较强的相关性(r < 0.01, p <0.001)。RMANOVA分析结果显示,三次吸痰时疼痛强度测量值均有显著变化趋势(测量效应P<0.05),两组间疼痛强度测量值差异有统计学意义(交互效应P<0.05)。Sidak事后检验结果显示,干预组和对照组在所有三次吸痰期间以及吸痰后5和15分钟的疼痛强度测量值存在显著差异(p值均<0.05)。在芬太尼总用量、芬太尼总输注量和芬太尼总用量方面,镇痛药处方量也有显著的干预作用(p值均<0.05)。结论:应用CPOT是评价和控制机械通气患者镇痛药物剂量调整的积极步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Practice Today
Nursing Practice Today Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Functional capacity and its associated factors in older adults in the rural area in Brazil Predictors of prone position use in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units: A cross-sectional study Fear of COVID-19, stress, anxiety, depression, and insomnia among undergraduate nursing students in Oman The level of teamwork and associated factors in the selected hospitals from the nurses' perspective: A cross-sectional study A thematic analysis of professionalism from the perspective of nurse managers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1