Combining the PROMETHEE method and mathematical programming for multi-objective facility location problem

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making Pub Date : 2018-09-05 DOI:10.1504/IJMCDM.2018.10015558
M. Elleuch, A. Frikha
{"title":"Combining the PROMETHEE method and mathematical programming for multi-objective facility location problem","authors":"M. Elleuch, A. Frikha","doi":"10.1504/IJMCDM.2018.10015558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The decision making concerning where to locate new facilities is crucial in designing distribution networks. In the present study, the supply chain concept and the multi-objective facility location problem were studied. We integrated also multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and linear programming model (LPM) methods to support selection of best sites according many objectives. In addition, facility location decision involves both qualitative and quantitative criteria. In order to select the best location, it is often necessary to compromise possibly conflicting tangible and intangible factors. The major weaknesses of the different multi-objective programming models used to solve the problem are that they are basically mathematical and they ignore qualitative objectives, such as the environmental and socio-economic factors which are important in facility location selection. In this paper, we reported the obtained results when applying an integrated MCDA/LPM approach to solve the facility location problem (FLP) for an aluminium company in Tunisia. We combined three methods, preference-ranking organisation method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) and a linear programming model (LPM), using the stretching and shrinking graphs method (SSG method).","PeriodicalId":38183,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making","volume":"7 1","pages":"195-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMCDM.2018.10015558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The decision making concerning where to locate new facilities is crucial in designing distribution networks. In the present study, the supply chain concept and the multi-objective facility location problem were studied. We integrated also multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and linear programming model (LPM) methods to support selection of best sites according many objectives. In addition, facility location decision involves both qualitative and quantitative criteria. In order to select the best location, it is often necessary to compromise possibly conflicting tangible and intangible factors. The major weaknesses of the different multi-objective programming models used to solve the problem are that they are basically mathematical and they ignore qualitative objectives, such as the environmental and socio-economic factors which are important in facility location selection. In this paper, we reported the obtained results when applying an integrated MCDA/LPM approach to solve the facility location problem (FLP) for an aluminium company in Tunisia. We combined three methods, preference-ranking organisation method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) and a linear programming model (LPM), using the stretching and shrinking graphs method (SSG method).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合PROMETHEE方法和数学规划求解多目标设施选址问题
在配电网设计中,新设施选址的决策是至关重要的。本文研究了供应链概念和多目标设施选址问题。我们还整合了多准则决策分析(MCDA)和线性规划模型(LPM)方法,以支持根据多个目标选择最佳站点。此外,设施选址决策涉及定性和定量标准。为了选择最佳地点,往往需要折衷可能相互冲突的有形和无形因素。用于解决这一问题的不同多目标规划模型的主要缺点是它们基本上是数学的,而忽略了定性目标,例如环境和社会经济因素,这些因素在设施选址中很重要。在本文中,我们报告了应用集成的MCDA/LPM方法解决突尼斯一家铝业公司的设施选址问题(FLP)时获得的结果。我们结合了三种方法,即富集评价的偏好排序组织方法(PROMETHEE)和线性规划模型(LPM),使用拉伸和收缩图方法(SSG方法)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making
International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making Business, Management and Accounting-Strategy and Management
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: IJMCDM is a scholarly journal that publishes high quality research contributing to the theory and practice of decision making in ill-structured problems involving multiple criteria, goals and objectives. The journal publishes papers concerning all aspects of multicriteria decision making (MCDM), including theoretical studies, empirical investigations, comparisons and real-world applications. Papers exploring the connections with other disciplines in operations research and management science are particularly welcome. Topics covered include: -Artificial intelligence, evolutionary computation, soft computing in MCDM -Conjoint/performance measurement -Decision making under uncertainty -Disaggregation analysis, preference learning/elicitation -Group decision making, multicriteria games -Multi-attribute utility/value theory -Multi-criteria decision support systems and knowledge-based systems -Multi-objective mathematical programming -Outranking relations theory -Preference modelling -Problem structuring with multiple criteria -Risk analysis/modelling, sensitivity/robustness analysis -Social choice models -Theoretical foundations of MCDM, rough set theory -Innovative applied research in relevant fields
期刊最新文献
Selection of polar vessels using multicriteria and capability-based methods Selection of appropriate age management measures using multicriteria decision making methods with interrelationships A Decision-Making Approach for Open Innovation Model Selection in the Turkish Automotive Industry Development of a Best-Worst Method based MCDM approach for solar power plant location selection: An Application to Tunceli, Turkey A new Matrix Form Genetic Encoding for Balanced, Compact and Connected Sectorization through NSGA-II
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1