Evaluation of intra-articular injection of bupivacaine with morphine or methylprednisolone or alone on pain after knee arthroscopy

H. Kayalha, A. Alizadeh, Hoda Shahamat, Idin Binazadeh, S. Rastak, M. Sofiabadi
{"title":"Evaluation of intra-articular injection of bupivacaine with morphine or methylprednisolone or alone on pain after knee arthroscopy","authors":"H. Kayalha, A. Alizadeh, Hoda Shahamat, Idin Binazadeh, S. Rastak, M. Sofiabadi","doi":"10.32592/jbirjandunivmedsci.2020.27.4.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: Knee arthroscopy is used to diagnose and treat intra-articular lesions. The control of acute pain after arthroscopy requires the use of a method with the least side effects and most efficacies. This study aimed to compare the sedative effect of bupivacaine in combination with morphine, methylprednisolone, or alone in knee arthroscopy after intra-articular injection. Materials and Methods: This clinical-randomized three-blind trial included 99 volunteer patients with knee arthroscopy. The patients were randomly divided into three groups of bupivacaine (0.5%), morphine (5 mg)+bupivacaine (0.5%), and methylprednisolone (40 mg)+bupivacaine (0.5%). At the end of the surgical operation, the intra-articular injection of the medications were performed, and the amount of postoperative pain was evaluated and recorded based on visual analog scale 6, 12, 18, and 24 h after injection. In addition, the reception of the injected analgesic within 24 h was recorded in this study. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 19) through ANOVA. Results: In all three groups, the pain intensity decreased significantly over time. The pain intensity of the methylprednisolone+bupivacaine and morphine+bupivacaine groups was similar at different postoperative periods; however, the pain intensity of these groups was significantly lower than that in the control group. In addition, consumption of the analgesics was significantly reduced in the methylprednisolone+bupivacaine group, compared to the other two groups. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the intra-articular injection of methylprednisolone+bupivacaine and morphine+bupivacaine was more effective than bupivacaine alone in reduction of pain and the need for injectable analgesia.","PeriodicalId":31015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Birjand University of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Birjand University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32592/jbirjandunivmedsci.2020.27.4.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims: Knee arthroscopy is used to diagnose and treat intra-articular lesions. The control of acute pain after arthroscopy requires the use of a method with the least side effects and most efficacies. This study aimed to compare the sedative effect of bupivacaine in combination with morphine, methylprednisolone, or alone in knee arthroscopy after intra-articular injection. Materials and Methods: This clinical-randomized three-blind trial included 99 volunteer patients with knee arthroscopy. The patients were randomly divided into three groups of bupivacaine (0.5%), morphine (5 mg)+bupivacaine (0.5%), and methylprednisolone (40 mg)+bupivacaine (0.5%). At the end of the surgical operation, the intra-articular injection of the medications were performed, and the amount of postoperative pain was evaluated and recorded based on visual analog scale 6, 12, 18, and 24 h after injection. In addition, the reception of the injected analgesic within 24 h was recorded in this study. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 19) through ANOVA. Results: In all three groups, the pain intensity decreased significantly over time. The pain intensity of the methylprednisolone+bupivacaine and morphine+bupivacaine groups was similar at different postoperative periods; however, the pain intensity of these groups was significantly lower than that in the control group. In addition, consumption of the analgesics was significantly reduced in the methylprednisolone+bupivacaine group, compared to the other two groups. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the intra-articular injection of methylprednisolone+bupivacaine and morphine+bupivacaine was more effective than bupivacaine alone in reduction of pain and the need for injectable analgesia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布比卡因联合吗啡、甲基强的松龙或单独关节内注射对膝关节镜术后疼痛的评价
背景和目的:膝关节镜用于诊断和治疗关节内病变。关节镜检查后急性疼痛的控制需要使用副作用最小、疗效最高的方法。本研究旨在比较布比卡因与吗啡、甲基强的松龙或单独使用在关节内注射后膝关节镜下的镇静效果。材料和方法:本临床随机三盲试验包括99名膝关节镜检查志愿者。将患者随机分为三组,分别为布比卡因(0.5%)、吗啡(5mg)+布比卡因和甲基强的松龙(40mg)+布哌卡因(0.5%)。在手术结束时,进行关节内药物注射,并在注射后6、12、18和24小时根据视觉模拟量表评估和记录术后疼痛程度。此外,在本研究中记录了24小时内注射的镇痛药的接收情况。数据采用SPSS软件(19版)进行方差分析。结果:随着时间的推移,三组患者的疼痛强度均显著降低。甲基强的松龙+布比卡因组和吗啡+布比卡卡因组在不同术后时间段的疼痛强度相似;然而,这些组的疼痛强度明显低于对照组。此外,与其他两组相比,甲基强的松龙+布比卡因组的镇痛剂消耗量显著减少。结论:本研究结果表明,甲基强的松龙+布比卡因和吗啡+布比卡卡因关节内注射在减轻疼痛和注射镇痛需求方面比单独使用布比卡因更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Persian version of Mentalized Affectivity Scale Effect of Kelussia odoratissima Mozaff extract on PNPLA3 gene expression in non-alcoholic fatty liver and control rats The protein-nanoparticle interaction (protein corona) and its importance on the therapeutic application of nanoparticles Comparison of antioxidant and antibacterial activities of various herbal essential oils: An In vitro study Prevalence and factors related to infection and mortality due to COVID-19 among patients of Shohada Ghaen Hospital, Ghaen, Iran, 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1