Runaway Slaves, Militant Abolitionists, and the Critique of American Prisons, 1830–60

IF 1 1区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY History Workshop Journal Pub Date : 2021-05-21 DOI:10.1093/HWJ/DBAA033
Jesse Olsavsky
{"title":"Runaway Slaves, Militant Abolitionists, and the Critique of American Prisons, 1830–60","authors":"Jesse Olsavsky","doi":"10.1093/HWJ/DBAA033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This essay reveals the ways that runaways and abolitionists, through their critiques of American prisons in the decades prior to the American Civil War, collectively originated the ideas and practices of prison abolition. It began with fugitive slaves who named slavery the ‘prison house’. Runaways, and the most radical amongst abolitionists, many of whom served time for their activism, used fugitives’ carceral language to grasp the place of prisons within the greater ‘prison house’ of American slavery. They actively assisted others to escape this ‘prison house’. They engaged in projects of prison reform and abolition of capital punishment. They freed incarcerated runaways and abolitionists from jails, and resisted racist policing. In the process, these radicals became disenchanted with the modernizing reform project known as the ‘penitentiary’, in some cases calling for the abolition of prisons and police, alongside the abolition of slavery. In short, because the plantation and the penitentiary merged after the Civil War, abolitionist critiques of both provided the little-studied roots of contemporary prison-abolitionist thought.","PeriodicalId":46915,"journal":{"name":"History Workshop Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/HWJ/DBAA033","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History Workshop Journal","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/HWJ/DBAA033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This essay reveals the ways that runaways and abolitionists, through their critiques of American prisons in the decades prior to the American Civil War, collectively originated the ideas and practices of prison abolition. It began with fugitive slaves who named slavery the ‘prison house’. Runaways, and the most radical amongst abolitionists, many of whom served time for their activism, used fugitives’ carceral language to grasp the place of prisons within the greater ‘prison house’ of American slavery. They actively assisted others to escape this ‘prison house’. They engaged in projects of prison reform and abolition of capital punishment. They freed incarcerated runaways and abolitionists from jails, and resisted racist policing. In the process, these radicals became disenchanted with the modernizing reform project known as the ‘penitentiary’, in some cases calling for the abolition of prisons and police, alongside the abolition of slavery. In short, because the plantation and the penitentiary merged after the Civil War, abolitionist critiques of both provided the little-studied roots of contemporary prison-abolitionist thought.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
逃亡奴隶、激进废奴主义者与美国监狱批判,1830-60
本文揭示了逃亡者和废奴主义者在美国内战前几十年对美国监狱的批评,共同提出了废除监狱的想法和实践。它始于逃亡奴隶,他们将奴隶制命名为“监狱之家”。逃亡者是废奴主义者中最激进的一个,其中许多人因其激进主义而服刑,他们用逃亡者的尸体语言来把握监狱在美国奴隶制更大的“监狱之家”中的位置。他们积极协助他人逃离这个“监狱”。他们参与了监狱改革和废除死刑的项目。他们从监狱中释放了被监禁的逃亡者和废奴主义者,并抵制种族主义警察。在这个过程中,这些激进分子对被称为“监狱”的现代化改革项目不再抱有幻想,在某些情况下,他们呼吁废除监狱和警察,同时废除奴隶制。简言之,由于种植园和监狱在内战后合并,废奴主义者对两者的批评为当代监狱废奴主义思想提供了很少研究的根源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Since its launch in 1976, History Workshop Journal has become one of the world"s leading historical journals. Through incisive scholarship and imaginative presentation it brings past and present into dialogue, engaging readers inside and outside universities. HWJ publishes a wide variety of essays, reports and reviews, ranging from literary to economic subjects, local history to geopolitical analyses. Clarity of style, challenging argument and creative use of visual sources are especially valued.
期刊最新文献
Restless Somnambulists: Reflections on Violence, Accountability, and Historical Practice from Sri Lanka Editorial: Writing History in Sri Lanka Now ‘The Russians are Coming!’ Entangled Peripheries and Cold War Competition in Motorcycle Speedway Ria Kapoor, Making Refugees in India Paul Ginsborg (1945–2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1