Policing disability: alliance building, police divestment and community investment

IF 1.2 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Current Issues in Criminal Justice Pub Date : 2022-02-05 DOI:10.1080/10345329.2022.2029084
S. Rowe, L. Dowse, Michael Baker, E. Baldry
{"title":"Policing disability: alliance building, police divestment and community investment","authors":"S. Rowe, L. Dowse, Michael Baker, E. Baldry","doi":"10.1080/10345329.2022.2029084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Amidst the increase in protest, activism and scholarship about police violence and repression in recent years, considerations of disability and ableism continue to be relegated to the margins. This article draws on interviews with leading disability justice advocates in Australia to shed light on the nature of police interactions with people with disability. Our analysis contributes to critical scholarship, advocacy and activism in four key ways. First, we reveal how the ubiquity of ableism in policing renders people with disability dangerous and undeserving Others. Second, we exemplify how the mutually constitutive roles of racism and ableism in policing consolidate the inseparability of the struggles for justice of racialised people and people with disability. Third, we reveal how the persistence of sexism and ableism in policing fails to protect victimised women with disability by constructing them and their experiences of violence as unbelievable subjects. Fourth, we affirm the vital importance of building alternative, community-driven approaches to safety. Our analysis underscores the necessity of attending to the interactions between racism, ableism and sexism in progressing scholarship and organising to divest funds from police and to eliminate their role in responding to unmet community care needs that they cannot and should not control.","PeriodicalId":43272,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Criminal Justice","volume":"34 1","pages":"171 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2022.2029084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Amidst the increase in protest, activism and scholarship about police violence and repression in recent years, considerations of disability and ableism continue to be relegated to the margins. This article draws on interviews with leading disability justice advocates in Australia to shed light on the nature of police interactions with people with disability. Our analysis contributes to critical scholarship, advocacy and activism in four key ways. First, we reveal how the ubiquity of ableism in policing renders people with disability dangerous and undeserving Others. Second, we exemplify how the mutually constitutive roles of racism and ableism in policing consolidate the inseparability of the struggles for justice of racialised people and people with disability. Third, we reveal how the persistence of sexism and ableism in policing fails to protect victimised women with disability by constructing them and their experiences of violence as unbelievable subjects. Fourth, we affirm the vital importance of building alternative, community-driven approaches to safety. Our analysis underscores the necessity of attending to the interactions between racism, ableism and sexism in progressing scholarship and organising to divest funds from police and to eliminate their role in responding to unmet community care needs that they cannot and should not control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
警务残疾:联盟建设、警察撤资和社区投资
摘要近年来,随着对警察暴力和镇压的抗议、激进主义和学术研究的增加,对残疾和能力主义的考虑继续被边缘化。本文引用了对澳大利亚主要残疾司法倡导者的采访,以阐明警察与残疾人互动的性质。我们的分析在四个关键方面为批判性学术、倡导和行动主义做出了贡献。首先,我们揭示了警务中普遍存在的能力主义如何使残疾人变得危险和不值得他人。其次,我们举例说明了种族主义和能力主义在警务中相互构成的作用如何巩固了种族主义者和残疾人争取正义斗争的不可分割性。第三,我们揭示了警察中持续存在的性别歧视和能力歧视如何未能通过将受害残疾妇女及其暴力经历构建为令人难以置信的主题来保护她们。第四,我们确认建立替代性、社区驱动的安全方法至关重要。我们的分析强调了在推进奖学金和组织从警察那里撤资以及消除他们在应对他们不能也不应该控制的未满足的社区护理需求方面的作用时,关注种族主义、能力歧视和性别歧视之间的互动的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Issues in Criminal Justice
Current Issues in Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
The new coercive control offence in NSW: (how) will it work? Intercepting family violence in covert police investigations: Considerations for police discretion and intervention Legal first responders: duty lawyers as an essential service ‘A storm is coming:' The New York Times coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic in American prisons The devil is in the detail: an evaluation of domestic violence evidence-in-chief in policing practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1