Centering Indigenous Approaches for a Better Cultural Resource Management: Lessons from the Dakota Access Pipeline

IF 1.6 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Transforming Anthropology Pub Date : 2023-08-23 DOI:10.1111/traa.12256
Phyllis S. Johnson
{"title":"Centering Indigenous Approaches for a Better Cultural Resource Management: Lessons from the Dakota Access Pipeline","authors":"Phyllis S. Johnson","doi":"10.1111/traa.12256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) has been one of the most nationally publicized of all protested pipelines in the United States. Since protests began at Standing Rock in November 2016, injustices to the natural and cultural environment inflicted by its construction have been scrutinized by the public, the media, archaeologists, and perhaps most of all, by Tribal nations residing in this area and throughout the United States. In this article, I focus specifically on the ways that the cultural resource management (CRM) process was manipulated and abused to benefit the monetary goals of Dakota Access, LLC and the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) over the interests and needs of Indigenous peoples. Following this discussion, I propose foregrounding the suggestions of Tribal nations through greater collaboration with these groups and changes to the archaeological legislation, both of which will lead to greater transparency and inclusivity in CRM.","PeriodicalId":44069,"journal":{"name":"Transforming Anthropology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transforming Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/traa.12256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) has been one of the most nationally publicized of all protested pipelines in the United States. Since protests began at Standing Rock in November 2016, injustices to the natural and cultural environment inflicted by its construction have been scrutinized by the public, the media, archaeologists, and perhaps most of all, by Tribal nations residing in this area and throughout the United States. In this article, I focus specifically on the ways that the cultural resource management (CRM) process was manipulated and abused to benefit the monetary goals of Dakota Access, LLC and the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) over the interests and needs of Indigenous peoples. Following this discussion, I propose foregrounding the suggestions of Tribal nations through greater collaboration with these groups and changes to the archaeological legislation, both of which will lead to greater transparency and inclusivity in CRM.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以土著方法为中心,更好地管理文化资源:来自达科他输油管道的经验教训
达科他州接入管道(DAPL)是美国所有抗议管道中最受全国关注的管道之一。自2016年11月Standing Rock开始抗议以来,公众、媒体、考古学家,也许最重要的是,居住在该地区和美国各地的部落国家,都在仔细审查其建设对自然和文化环境造成的不公正现象。在这篇文章中,我特别关注文化资源管理(CRM)过程被操纵和滥用的方式,以使Dakota Access,LLC和美国陆军工程兵团(USACE)的货币目标受益,而不是土著人民的利益和需求。在这次讨论之后,我建议通过与这些团体的更多合作和对考古立法的修改,突出部落国家的建议,这两项都将提高CRM的透明度和包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Commentary on "The Impact of Vertical Integration on Physician Behavior and Healthcare Delivery: Evidence from Gastroenterology Practices". Style Guide for Authors From Savage to Negro: Anthropology and the Construction of Race, 1896–1954Twenty‐Five Years Later From Savage to Negro: The Only Required Text The Learning Is in the Contradictions: Lee D. Baker and the Complexities of Race and Racism in Anthropology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1