The dynamics of serum vascular endothelial cadherin levels and its relationship with prognosis in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by sepsis

Zhenyu Li, Wei Li, Xiaolong Zong, Huiqing Hu
{"title":"The dynamics of serum vascular endothelial cadherin levels and its relationship with prognosis in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by sepsis","authors":"Zhenyu Li, Wei Li, Xiaolong Zong, Huiqing Hu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6680.2018.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the prognostic significance of serum vascular endothelial cadherine (VE-Cad) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) induced by sepsis. \n \n \nMethods \nA prospective observational study was performed between June 2015 and Dec 2017, and 48 ARDS patients induced by sepsis from intensive care unit (ICU) were enrolled. And 30 healthy volunteers were enrolled as control. ARDS group was divided into mild group (n=17), moderate group (n=18) and severe group (n=13). The dynamic levels of serum VE-Cad, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were monitored at day 1, 3 and 7 of admission. Clinical data including extravascular lung water index (EVLWI), pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI), lung injury score (LIS), APACHEⅡand SOFA were also collected. The t-test or chi square test were used in the comparison between the two groups. One-way ANOVA was used for comparison among multiple groups. \n \n \nResults \nThe serum VE-Cad level of septic group was higher than control group at day 1 of admission ([5.67±0.29] vs [0.28±0.03] g/L, t=101.2, P<0.01). The serum VE-Cad levels in the mild group, moderate group and severe group were (1.52±0.59), (3.45±0.68), and (4.68±0.53) g/L, respectively (F=15.45, P<0.01). There were positive correlation between VE-Cad levels and EVLWI, PVPI, LIS, TNF-α and IL-6 (r=0.640, 0.601, 0.507, 0.584, and 0.456, respectively, all P<0.01). The PaO2/FiO2and serum albumin level in death group (n=17) were lower than survival group (n=31) ([146.74±16.45] vs [245.42±12.13] mmHg [1 mmHg=0.133 kPa], t=23.72, P<0.01; [23.18±3.24] vs [29.16±3.45] g/L, t=5.865, P<0.01, respectively), and EVLWI , PVPI, LIS, serum lactate, mechanical ventilation time, 7 d fluid balance, APACHEⅡand SOFA in death group were all higher than survival group. The serum VE-Cad levels at day 1, 3 and 7 in death group were all higher than survival group ([4.72±0.96] vs [3.36±0.47] g/L, t=8.801; [3.87±0.28] vs [1.95±0.42] g/L, t=16.86; [3.92±0.53] vs [0.96±0.28] g/L, t=25.42, respectively, all P<0.01). The area under curve (AUC) of VE-Cad for ARDS outcome prediction was 0.878 with sensitivity of 100.00% and specificity of 58.06% with a cutoff of 3.035 g/L. \n \n \nConclusion \nSerum VE-Cad level increases in patients with ARDS induced by sepsis, and positively correlates with disease severity, which could be a potential predictor for prognosis. \n \n \nKey words: \nSepsis; Acute respiratory distress syndrome; VE-cadherin; Tumor necrosis factor-alpha; Prognosis","PeriodicalId":10127,"journal":{"name":"中华传染病杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华传染病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6680.2018.08.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To investigate the prognostic significance of serum vascular endothelial cadherine (VE-Cad) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) induced by sepsis. Methods A prospective observational study was performed between June 2015 and Dec 2017, and 48 ARDS patients induced by sepsis from intensive care unit (ICU) were enrolled. And 30 healthy volunteers were enrolled as control. ARDS group was divided into mild group (n=17), moderate group (n=18) and severe group (n=13). The dynamic levels of serum VE-Cad, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were monitored at day 1, 3 and 7 of admission. Clinical data including extravascular lung water index (EVLWI), pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI), lung injury score (LIS), APACHEⅡand SOFA were also collected. The t-test or chi square test were used in the comparison between the two groups. One-way ANOVA was used for comparison among multiple groups. Results The serum VE-Cad level of septic group was higher than control group at day 1 of admission ([5.67±0.29] vs [0.28±0.03] g/L, t=101.2, P<0.01). The serum VE-Cad levels in the mild group, moderate group and severe group were (1.52±0.59), (3.45±0.68), and (4.68±0.53) g/L, respectively (F=15.45, P<0.01). There were positive correlation between VE-Cad levels and EVLWI, PVPI, LIS, TNF-α and IL-6 (r=0.640, 0.601, 0.507, 0.584, and 0.456, respectively, all P<0.01). The PaO2/FiO2and serum albumin level in death group (n=17) were lower than survival group (n=31) ([146.74±16.45] vs [245.42±12.13] mmHg [1 mmHg=0.133 kPa], t=23.72, P<0.01; [23.18±3.24] vs [29.16±3.45] g/L, t=5.865, P<0.01, respectively), and EVLWI , PVPI, LIS, serum lactate, mechanical ventilation time, 7 d fluid balance, APACHEⅡand SOFA in death group were all higher than survival group. The serum VE-Cad levels at day 1, 3 and 7 in death group were all higher than survival group ([4.72±0.96] vs [3.36±0.47] g/L, t=8.801; [3.87±0.28] vs [1.95±0.42] g/L, t=16.86; [3.92±0.53] vs [0.96±0.28] g/L, t=25.42, respectively, all P<0.01). The area under curve (AUC) of VE-Cad for ARDS outcome prediction was 0.878 with sensitivity of 100.00% and specificity of 58.06% with a cutoff of 3.035 g/L. Conclusion Serum VE-Cad level increases in patients with ARDS induced by sepsis, and positively correlates with disease severity, which could be a potential predictor for prognosis. Key words: Sepsis; Acute respiratory distress syndrome; VE-cadherin; Tumor necrosis factor-alpha; Prognosis
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
败血症并发急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者血清血管内皮钙粘蛋白水平动态变化及其与预后的关系
目的探讨血清血管内皮钙素(VE-Cad)在脓毒症致急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者中的预后意义。方法2015年6月至2017年12月进行前瞻性观察研究,纳入重症监护病房(ICU) 48例脓毒症致ARDS患者。30名健康志愿者作为对照。ARDS组分为轻度组(n=17)、中度组(n=18)和重度组(n=13)。于入院第1、3、7天监测血清VE-Cad、肿瘤坏死因子-α (TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)的动态水平。收集肺血管外水指数(EVLWI)、肺血管通透性指数(PVPI)、肺损伤评分(LIS)、APACHEⅡ、SOFA等临床数据。两组间比较采用t检验或卡方检验。多组间比较采用单因素方差分析。结果脓毒症组患者入院第1天血清VE-Cad水平高于对照组([5.67±0.29]vs[0.28±0.03]g/L, t=101.2, P<0.01)。轻度组、中度组、重度组血清VE-Cad水平分别为(1.52±0.59)、(3.45±0.68)、(4.68±0.53)g/L (F=15.45, P<0.01)。VE-Cad水平与EVLWI、PVPI、LIS、TNF-α、IL-6呈正相关(r分别为0.640、0.601、0.507、0.584、0.456,P均<0.01)。死亡组(n=17) PaO2/ fio2、血清白蛋白水平低于生存组(n=31)([146.74±16.45]vs[245.42±12.13]mmHg [1 mmHg=0.133 kPa], t=23.72, P<0.01;[23.18±3.24]vs[29.16±3.45]g/L, t=5.865, P均<0.01),死亡组EVLWI、PVPI、LIS、血清乳酸、机械通气时间、7 d体液平衡、APACHEⅡ、SOFA均高于生存组。死亡组患者第1、3、7天血清VE-Cad水平均高于生存组([4.72±0.96]vs[3.36±0.47]g/L, t=8.801;[3.87±0.28]vs[1.95±0.42]g/L, t=16.86;[3.92±0.53]vs[0.96±0.28]g/L, t=25.42, P均<0.01)。VE-Cad预测ARDS预后的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.878,敏感性为100.00%,特异性为58.06%,临界值为3.035 g/L。结论败血症致ARDS患者血清VE-Cad水平升高,且与病情严重程度呈正相关,可作为预测预后的潜在指标。关键词:脓毒症;急性呼吸窘迫综合征;VE-cadherin;肿瘤坏死因子;预后
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5280
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Morphological characteristics of lung tissue in two cases with critical corona virus disease 2019 Establishing emergency medical system of classified treatment to alleviate the overload medical needs after the community outbreak of corona virus disease 2019 in Wuhan City Clinical analysis of nine cases with critical corona virus disease 2019 in Hainan province/ 中华传染病杂志 Clinical analysis of risk factors for severe patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia Exploration of digestive tract symptoms causesd by the novel coronavirus infection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1