Postqualitative geographies

IF 3.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geography Compass Pub Date : 2022-09-04 DOI:10.1111/gec3.12661
Candice P. Boyd
{"title":"Postqualitative geographies","authors":"Candice P. Boyd","doi":"10.1111/gec3.12661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This essay examines recent literature that advocates for a postqualitative approach to research in the social sciences and humanities. Exploring across disciplinary boundaries, this essay interrogates parallel developments in the field of education, much of which are informed by non-representational theories in geography as well as current trends within the discipline to advance postphenomenological and posthumanist methodologies. As a starting point, the on-going contribution of qualitative methods to human geography is acknowledged alongside a questioning of their currency in the light of posthumanism. The extreme position—that ‘conventional’ qualitative methods are based on an outmoded view of the human subject and should, therefore, be discarded—is evaluated before presenting a ‘softer’ version of postqualitative inquiry which re-thinks the subject and troubles method, rather than rejecting it outright. The essay continues by focussing on work within and beyond human geography that aims to advance a ‘post-’ sensibility in relation to method—one that does not eschew method itself but rather the kind of proceduralism that qualitative methods often entail—and concludes by considering the practical implications of postqualitative approaches for human geography.</p>","PeriodicalId":51411,"journal":{"name":"Geography Compass","volume":"16 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gec3.12661","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography Compass","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gec3.12661","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This essay examines recent literature that advocates for a postqualitative approach to research in the social sciences and humanities. Exploring across disciplinary boundaries, this essay interrogates parallel developments in the field of education, much of which are informed by non-representational theories in geography as well as current trends within the discipline to advance postphenomenological and posthumanist methodologies. As a starting point, the on-going contribution of qualitative methods to human geography is acknowledged alongside a questioning of their currency in the light of posthumanism. The extreme position—that ‘conventional’ qualitative methods are based on an outmoded view of the human subject and should, therefore, be discarded—is evaluated before presenting a ‘softer’ version of postqualitative inquiry which re-thinks the subject and troubles method, rather than rejecting it outright. The essay continues by focussing on work within and beyond human geography that aims to advance a ‘post-’ sensibility in relation to method—one that does not eschew method itself but rather the kind of proceduralism that qualitative methods often entail—and concludes by considering the practical implications of postqualitative approaches for human geography.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后定性地理
这篇文章检查了最近的文献,主张在社会科学和人文科学研究的后定性方法。这篇文章跨越学科界限,探讨了教育领域的平行发展,其中大部分是由地理学的非表征理论以及学科内推进后现象学和后人文主义方法的当前趋势所提供的信息。作为一个起点,定性方法对人文地理学的持续贡献得到了承认,同时也在后人文主义的角度对其货币提出了质疑。极端的立场——“传统的”定性方法是基于对人类主体的一种过时的观点,因此应该被抛弃——在提出一种“更柔和”的后定性研究之前进行了评估,这种后定性研究重新思考了主体和麻烦的方法,而不是直接拒绝它。本文继续关注人文地理学内外的工作,旨在推进与方法相关的“后”敏感性——一种不回避方法本身,而是一种定性方法经常需要的程序主义——并通过考虑后定性方法对人文地理学的实际意义来结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geography Compass
Geography Compass GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Unique in its range, Geography Compass is an online-only journal publishing original, peer-reviewed surveys of current research from across the entire discipline. Geography Compass publishes state-of-the-art reviews, supported by a comprehensive bibliography and accessible to an international readership. Geography Compass is aimed at senior undergraduates, postgraduates and academics, and will provide a unique reference tool for researching essays, preparing lectures, writing a research proposal, or just keeping up with new developments in a specific area of interest.
期刊最新文献
Historical Geographies of Engineering: Knowledges, Practices, Identities Big Data (R)evolution in Geography: Complexity Modelling in the Last Two Decades The Legal Geographies of Contracts: A Method on Formation, Substance and Enforcement Disrupting the Chrononormativity of Geographies of Youth and Youth Studies: Learning From Infractions at the Border Defining Climate Finance Justice: Critical Geographies of Justice Amid Financialized Climate Action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1