Understanding Russia’s identity through Olympic ceremonies

IF 2.8 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM European Journal for Sport and Society Pub Date : 2022-02-04 DOI:10.1080/16138171.2022.2031518
Nina Kramareva, J. Grix
{"title":"Understanding Russia’s identity through Olympic ceremonies","authors":"Nina Kramareva, J. Grix","doi":"10.1080/16138171.2022.2031518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper focuses on the comparative (mis-)interpretation of the 1980 Moscow and 2014 Sochi Olympic ceremonies by media outlets located in Great Britain and the USA, Russia’s ‘significant others’. Further, the paper attempts to uncover the most persistent facets of Russia’s identity – by decoding culturally-specific meanings of the signs and symbols in both ceremonies – and to trace which aspects of its national narrative Russia had to let go eventually in the course of the 34 years that separate the two Olympics. This is undertaken by a documentary analysis of ‘Western’ media between the periods of 20 July and 6 August for Moscow and 7–23 February for Sochi – time frames when the direct coverage of the ceremonies took place. Our key findings suggest that instead of enabling Russia to validate a new national identity and image the Western media only helped to reproduce resilient reciprocal national identities. Furthermore, it was the Sochi Olympics as Russia's biggest soft power party to date, not the aftermath, which, not least through a transformative attendant media response/framing from both sides, became the closing chapter of the Russian-Western interdependent identity construction in the early 21st century. Thus, apart from placing the spotlight on Russia’s evolving identity and interests, this paper also investigates how the USA’s and the UK’s media resisted Russia’s (Soviet) soft power strategy, whilst in the process solidifying their own identities and promoting their strategic narratives.","PeriodicalId":45735,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for Sport and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal for Sport and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2022.2031518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This paper focuses on the comparative (mis-)interpretation of the 1980 Moscow and 2014 Sochi Olympic ceremonies by media outlets located in Great Britain and the USA, Russia’s ‘significant others’. Further, the paper attempts to uncover the most persistent facets of Russia’s identity – by decoding culturally-specific meanings of the signs and symbols in both ceremonies – and to trace which aspects of its national narrative Russia had to let go eventually in the course of the 34 years that separate the two Olympics. This is undertaken by a documentary analysis of ‘Western’ media between the periods of 20 July and 6 August for Moscow and 7–23 February for Sochi – time frames when the direct coverage of the ceremonies took place. Our key findings suggest that instead of enabling Russia to validate a new national identity and image the Western media only helped to reproduce resilient reciprocal national identities. Furthermore, it was the Sochi Olympics as Russia's biggest soft power party to date, not the aftermath, which, not least through a transformative attendant media response/framing from both sides, became the closing chapter of the Russian-Western interdependent identity construction in the early 21st century. Thus, apart from placing the spotlight on Russia’s evolving identity and interests, this paper also investigates how the USA’s and the UK’s media resisted Russia’s (Soviet) soft power strategy, whilst in the process solidifying their own identities and promoting their strategic narratives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过奥运仪式了解俄罗斯的身份
摘要:本文关注的是俄罗斯的“重要他人”——英国和美国的媒体对1980年莫斯科和2014年索契奥运会开幕式的比较(错误)解读。此外,本文试图揭示俄罗斯身份最持久的方面——通过解码两个仪式中标志和符号的文化特定含义——并追踪在两届奥运会分开的34年期间,俄罗斯最终不得不放弃其国家叙事的哪些方面。这是通过对莫斯科的7月20日至8月6日和索契的2月7日至23日期间的“西方”媒体进行的文献分析进行的,这是直接报道仪式的时间框架。我们的主要发现表明,西方媒体并没有使俄罗斯能够验证新的国家认同和形象,而是帮助再现了具有弹性的互惠国家认同。此外,索契冬奥会是俄罗斯迄今为止最大的软实力盛会,而不是冬奥会的后果,尤其是通过随之而来的双方媒体的变革性回应/框架,成为21世纪初俄罗斯与西方相互依存的身份建构的最后一章。因此,除了关注俄罗斯不断演变的身份和利益之外,本文还研究了美国和英国的媒体如何抵制俄罗斯(苏联)软实力战略,同时在此过程中巩固自己的身份并促进其战略叙事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal for Sport and Society
European Journal for Sport and Society HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
The contested terrain of sport, media & indigenous representation: a case study of sámi sport organisation in Norway Invited editorial: concussion, causation and interdisciplinary research ‘Reimagining’ gender equality in media coverage?: feminist frameworks in European and Olympic portrayal guidelines ‘Yet, they didn’t sign me’: the production of precarity in amateur and semi-professional football in Nigeria ‘Forgive me for saying, but rugby is not a game for women:’ an exploration of contemporary attitudes towards women’s rugby union
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1