Johan Sjöström, Daniel Brandon, Alastair Temple, Johan Anderson, Robert McNamee
{"title":"External fire plumes from mass timber compartment fires—Comparison to test methods for regulatory compliance of façades","authors":"Johan Sjöström, Daniel Brandon, Alastair Temple, Johan Anderson, Robert McNamee","doi":"10.1002/fam.3129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Post-flashover fires inherently lead to external fire plumes, constituting a hazard for rapid fire spread over façades. As multi-storey mass timber buildings with internal visible timber surfaces become more common, there are concerns that such buildings would produce larger external plumes and hazards (assuming all other parameters equal). The literature reveals only indications of this, and how the actual exposure relates to different test methods for assessment is unknown. Here we utilise a series of full-scale mass timber compartment tests to quantify the exposure to the external façade. An incombustible external façade is instrumented with gauges at positions corresponding to reference data from several different assessment methods. The results show that there is an increase in plume duration, height, and temperatures when increasing the areas of exposed timber, but that this increase is less for normal- to large-opening compartments, than was previously seen in small-opening compartments. Also, normal variations in external wind speed have a larger influence on plume heights than the effect of doubling exposed timber surfaces. Test methods used for regulatory compliance differ significantly not only in exposure but also in pass/fail criteria. The proposed European large exposure method and the BS8414 method exhibit exposures on par with the severe end of what could be expected from mass timber compartments, whereas methods like SP Fire 105 and Lepir II produce significantly less severe plumes. However, the safety level is always a combination of exposure and assessment criteria. This data can help justify assessment criteria from a performance perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":12186,"journal":{"name":"Fire and Materials","volume":"47 4","pages":"433-444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fam.3129","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire and Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fam.3129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Post-flashover fires inherently lead to external fire plumes, constituting a hazard for rapid fire spread over façades. As multi-storey mass timber buildings with internal visible timber surfaces become more common, there are concerns that such buildings would produce larger external plumes and hazards (assuming all other parameters equal). The literature reveals only indications of this, and how the actual exposure relates to different test methods for assessment is unknown. Here we utilise a series of full-scale mass timber compartment tests to quantify the exposure to the external façade. An incombustible external façade is instrumented with gauges at positions corresponding to reference data from several different assessment methods. The results show that there is an increase in plume duration, height, and temperatures when increasing the areas of exposed timber, but that this increase is less for normal- to large-opening compartments, than was previously seen in small-opening compartments. Also, normal variations in external wind speed have a larger influence on plume heights than the effect of doubling exposed timber surfaces. Test methods used for regulatory compliance differ significantly not only in exposure but also in pass/fail criteria. The proposed European large exposure method and the BS8414 method exhibit exposures on par with the severe end of what could be expected from mass timber compartments, whereas methods like SP Fire 105 and Lepir II produce significantly less severe plumes. However, the safety level is always a combination of exposure and assessment criteria. This data can help justify assessment criteria from a performance perspective.
闪络后的火灾本质上会导致外部火灾羽流,构成火灾在外墙上快速蔓延的危险。随着内部可见木材表面的多层大块木材建筑变得越来越普遍,人们担心这种建筑会产生更大的外部羽状物和危险(假设所有其他参数相同)。文献只揭示了这方面的迹象,而实际暴露与不同的评估测试方法之间的关系尚不清楚。在这里,我们使用了一系列全尺寸大体积木材隔间测试来量化暴露在外立面的情况。不燃的外立面在与几种不同评估方法的参考数据相对应的位置安装了仪表。结果表明,当暴露木材的面积增加时,烟羽的持续时间、高度和温度都会增加,但这种增加在正常到大开口的隔间中要比以前在小开口隔间中看到的要少。此外,外部风速的正常变化对羽流高度的影响比暴露木材表面加倍的影响更大。用于监管合规性的测试方法不仅在暴露方面存在显著差异,而且在通过/不通过标准方面也存在显著差异。拟议的欧洲大面积暴露方法和BS8414方法的暴露程度与大块木材隔间的严重程度相当,而SP Fire 105和Lepir II等方法产生的羽流严重程度明显较低。然而,安全水平始终是暴露和评估标准的结合。这些数据有助于从绩效角度证明评估标准的合理性。
期刊介绍:
Fire and Materials is an international journal for scientific and technological communications directed at the fire properties of materials and the products into which they are made. This covers all aspects of the polymer field and the end uses where polymers find application; the important developments in the fields of natural products - wood and cellulosics; non-polymeric materials - metals and ceramics; as well as the chemistry and industrial applications of fire retardant chemicals.
Contributions will be particularly welcomed on heat release; properties of combustion products - smoke opacity, toxicity and corrosivity; modelling and testing.