Perforaci�n percut�nea de la v�lvula pulmonar en reci�n nacidos. Evoluci�n del abordaje transfemoral al transyugular

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS REC Interventional Cardiology Pub Date : 2023-04-19 DOI:10.24875/recic.m23000362
Marc Figueras Coll, Andrea Fidalgo García, Gerard Martí Aguasca, P. Blasco
{"title":"Perforaci�n percut�nea de la v�lvula pulmonar en reci�n nacidos. Evoluci�n del abordaje transfemoral al transyugular","authors":"Marc Figueras Coll, Andrea Fidalgo García, Gerard Martí Aguasca, P. Blasco","doi":"10.24875/recic.m23000362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and objectives: Pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum (PA/IVS) is a rare but serious cyanotic congenital heart disease. Depending on the patient’s anatomy, different therapeutic strategies—surgical or trancatheter—can be planned. The objective of this study was to describe the results of transcatheter pulmonary valve perforation in patients with PA/IVS in a single tertiary center, and compare transjugular to transfemoral approach. The need for additional source of pulmonary flow (ductal stenting or systemic-to-pulmonary artery fistula) at follow-up was reviewed to identify possible risk factors associated with this reintervention. Methods: patients with PA/IVS referred for transcatheter pulmonary valve perforation as first-line therapy from February 2004 through May 2022 were included. Technical procedural details, total procedural and fluoroscopy times, and demographic and echocardiographic data were studied. Results: A total of 22 patients were included. Procedure was successful in 20 cases (91%). The rate of complications was 2/22 (9%). No deaths were reported. The transjugular and transfemoral approaches were equally safe and effective. The total median procedural (n = 20) and fluoroscopy times (n = 16), however, were shorter in the transjugular compared to the transfemoral approach (85 min vs 156 min, and 31 min vs 62 min, respectively), which reached statistical significance. At follow-up, 8/20 (40%) patients needed additional flow (4 ductal stenting, 4 systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunts). No significant risk factors regarding this rein-tervention were reported.","PeriodicalId":34295,"journal":{"name":"REC Interventional Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REC Interventional Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/recic.m23000362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum (PA/IVS) is a rare but serious cyanotic congenital heart disease. Depending on the patient’s anatomy, different therapeutic strategies—surgical or trancatheter—can be planned. The objective of this study was to describe the results of transcatheter pulmonary valve perforation in patients with PA/IVS in a single tertiary center, and compare transjugular to transfemoral approach. The need for additional source of pulmonary flow (ductal stenting or systemic-to-pulmonary artery fistula) at follow-up was reviewed to identify possible risk factors associated with this reintervention. Methods: patients with PA/IVS referred for transcatheter pulmonary valve perforation as first-line therapy from February 2004 through May 2022 were included. Technical procedural details, total procedural and fluoroscopy times, and demographic and echocardiographic data were studied. Results: A total of 22 patients were included. Procedure was successful in 20 cases (91%). The rate of complications was 2/22 (9%). No deaths were reported. The transjugular and transfemoral approaches were equally safe and effective. The total median procedural (n = 20) and fluoroscopy times (n = 16), however, were shorter in the transjugular compared to the transfemoral approach (85 min vs 156 min, and 31 min vs 62 min, respectively), which reached statistical significance. At follow-up, 8/20 (40%) patients needed additional flow (4 ductal stenting, 4 systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunts). No significant risk factors regarding this rein-tervention were reported.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿经皮肺静脉穿刺术。经股动脉至经颈动脉入路的演变
引言和目的:室间隔完整的肺动脉闭锁(PA/IVS)是一种罕见但严重的发绀型先天性心脏病。根据患者的解剖结构,可以计划不同的治疗策略——手术或插管。本研究的目的是描述在单个三级中心对PA/IVS患者进行经导管肺动脉瓣穿孔的结果,并比较经颈静脉和经股动脉入路。对随访时是否需要额外的肺流来源(导管支架置入术或系统性肺动脉瘘)进行了审查,以确定与这种再干预相关的可能风险因素。方法:纳入2004年2月至2022年5月因经导管肺动脉瓣穿孔而转诊为一线治疗的PA/IVS患者。研究了技术操作细节、总操作和荧光透视时间以及人口统计学和超声心动图数据。结果:共纳入22例患者。手术成功20例(91%)。并发症发生率为2/22(9%)。没有死亡报告。经颈静脉和经股动脉入路同样安全有效。然而,与经股入路相比,经颈静脉的总中位手术时间(n=20)和荧光检查时间(n=16)更短(分别为85分钟vs 156分钟和31分钟vs 62分钟),这达到了统计学意义。在随访中,8/20(40%)的患者需要额外的流量(4个导管支架,4个系统至肺动脉分流)。没有关于这种干预的重大风险因素的报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
REC Interventional Cardiology
REC Interventional Cardiology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
28.60%
发文量
87
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Experiencia inicial con la nueva v�lvula pulmonar percut�nea autoexpandible Venus P Dise�o del estudio ROLLERCOASTR: aterectom�a rotacional, litotricia o l�ser para el tratamiento de estenosis coronarias calcificadas El a�o del primer �impacto� para REC: Interventional Cardiology Cuarenta a�os de Cardialysis: una organizaci�n europea l�der en investigaci�n cardiovascular A debate. Estenosis a�rtica grave asintom�tica, �es el momento de actuar? Perspectiva del cl�nico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1