Accuracy Assessment of a Variety of GPS Data Processing, Online Services and Software

Israa H. Mohammed, Tariq N. Ataiwe, Hisham Al Sharaa
{"title":"Accuracy Assessment of a Variety of GPS Data Processing, Online Services and Software","authors":"Israa H. Mohammed, Tariq N. Ataiwe, Hisham Al Sharaa","doi":"10.7494/geom.2021.15.4.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The processing of GPS observations in precise positioning is complex and requires professional surveyors since it must be carried out after each static measurement. In GPS network adjustment, the obtaining of the correct coordinates of the determined point is possible after determining the components of GPS vectors and aligning the networks of these vectors, while PPP requires the availability of precise products for the reference satellites orbits and clock. For that reason, surveyors can take advantage of free online GPS data processing. In this paper, the authors compare the results obtained from different sources of free online GPS data processing (AUSPOS, OPUS, CenterPoint RTX, APPS, MagicGNSS, CSRS-PPP, GAPS, and SCOUT) in terms of their accuracy, availability, and operation. This is then compared with free GPS processing software (gLAB and RTKLIB), and finally with commercial software (TBC Trimble Business Center). The results show that online processing services are more accurate than offline processing software, which indicates the strength of their algorithms and processes. The CSRS-PPP online service had the best results. The difference between the relative solution of AUSPOS and OPUS, and CSRS-PPP is insignificant.","PeriodicalId":36672,"journal":{"name":"Geomatics and Environmental Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomatics and Environmental Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7494/geom.2021.15.4.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The processing of GPS observations in precise positioning is complex and requires professional surveyors since it must be carried out after each static measurement. In GPS network adjustment, the obtaining of the correct coordinates of the determined point is possible after determining the components of GPS vectors and aligning the networks of these vectors, while PPP requires the availability of precise products for the reference satellites orbits and clock. For that reason, surveyors can take advantage of free online GPS data processing. In this paper, the authors compare the results obtained from different sources of free online GPS data processing (AUSPOS, OPUS, CenterPoint RTX, APPS, MagicGNSS, CSRS-PPP, GAPS, and SCOUT) in terms of their accuracy, availability, and operation. This is then compared with free GPS processing software (gLAB and RTKLIB), and finally with commercial software (TBC Trimble Business Center). The results show that online processing services are more accurate than offline processing software, which indicates the strength of their algorithms and processes. The CSRS-PPP online service had the best results. The difference between the relative solution of AUSPOS and OPUS, and CSRS-PPP is insignificant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
各种GPS数据处理、在线服务和软件的精度评估
精确定位中GPS观测的处理是复杂的,需要专业的测量人员,因为它必须在每次静态测量之后进行。在GPS网络调整中,在确定GPS矢量的分量并对齐这些矢量的网络之后,可以获得确定点的正确坐标,而PPP需要参考卫星轨道和时钟的精确产品。因此,测量人员可以利用免费的在线GPS数据处理。在本文中,作者比较了从不同的免费在线GPS数据处理来源(AUSPOS、OPUS、CenterPoint RTX、APPS、MagicGNSS、CSRS-PPP、GAPS和SCOUT)获得的结果的准确性、可用性和操作性。然后将其与免费GPS处理软件(gLAB和RTKLIB)进行比较,最后与商业软件(TBC Trimble Business Center)进行比较。结果表明,在线处理服务比离线处理软件更准确,这表明了它们的算法和流程的优势。CSRS-PPP在线服务的效果最好。AUSPOS和OPUS以及CSRS-PPP的相对解决方案之间的差异不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geomatics and Environmental Engineering
Geomatics and Environmental Engineering Earth and Planetary Sciences-Computers in Earth Sciences
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Improving Traffic-noise-mitigation Strategies with LiDAR-based 3D Tree-canopy Analysis Apartment Rental Market in Border Cities of Poland and Ukraine Comparison of Statistical and Machine-Learning Model for Analyzing Landslide Susceptibility in Sumedang Area, Indonesia Sustainability Analysis of Domestic Raw Water Supply in Bandung City of Indonesia Estimation of Natural Uranium and Its Risk-Assessment in Groundwater of Bangalore Urban District of Karnataka, India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1