Efectividad del uso de ketamina perioperatoria en pacientes sometidos a cirugía de raquis en tratamiento crónico con opioides

U. Rivas, E. V. Barriuso, L. T. Urrutia, M. García, J. Álvarez
{"title":"Efectividad del uso de ketamina perioperatoria en pacientes sometidos a cirugía de raquis en tratamiento crónico con opioides","authors":"U. Rivas, E. V. Barriuso, L. T. Urrutia, M. García, J. Álvarez","doi":"10.20986/RESED.2021.3825/2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The number of patients receiving chronic opioids undergoing spinal surgery has increased lately. Elevate records in visual analog scale (VAS) and opioid consumption are higher in this group of patients. Material and methods: Following the recommendations of the American Pain Society (APS), a new intra and postoperative analgesic protocol based on the use of ketamine was designed in 2018. Intraoperatively, a bolus of 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine was administered, followed by a dose infusion of 0.2 mg/kg/h until the surgical wound was closed. During the first 48 postoperative hours, a patient-controlled analgesia pump (PCA) of morphine-ketamine was maintained along with a multimodal analgesia regimen with paracetamol and dexketoprofen. An effectiveness analysis comparing the new protocol (ketamine group) with the previous one (control group), based on the use of tramadol 100 mg / 6h or PCA morphine, was done. During the first 48 postoperative hours, NVS records, need of rescue analgesia, morphine bolus or continuous morphine infusion (control group) or ketamine morphine infusion (ketamine group) were analyzed. Results: The patients in the ketamine group had lower NVS records than those in the control group during the first two postoperative hours (p = 0.001) and lower morphine rescues needs on the second postoperative day (p = 0.003). The need for continuous morphine-ketamine perfusion was significantly lower than the need for continuous morphine perfusion on the control group (p = 0.011). Conclusion: The protocol based on the use of ketamine, managed to improve the control of postoperative pain and significantly reduce the consumption of opioids in the first 48 hours after the intervention.","PeriodicalId":35974,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Sociedad Espanola del Dolor","volume":"28 1","pages":"92-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Sociedad Espanola del Dolor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20986/RESED.2021.3825/2020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The number of patients receiving chronic opioids undergoing spinal surgery has increased lately. Elevate records in visual analog scale (VAS) and opioid consumption are higher in this group of patients. Material and methods: Following the recommendations of the American Pain Society (APS), a new intra and postoperative analgesic protocol based on the use of ketamine was designed in 2018. Intraoperatively, a bolus of 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine was administered, followed by a dose infusion of 0.2 mg/kg/h until the surgical wound was closed. During the first 48 postoperative hours, a patient-controlled analgesia pump (PCA) of morphine-ketamine was maintained along with a multimodal analgesia regimen with paracetamol and dexketoprofen. An effectiveness analysis comparing the new protocol (ketamine group) with the previous one (control group), based on the use of tramadol 100 mg / 6h or PCA morphine, was done. During the first 48 postoperative hours, NVS records, need of rescue analgesia, morphine bolus or continuous morphine infusion (control group) or ketamine morphine infusion (ketamine group) were analyzed. Results: The patients in the ketamine group had lower NVS records than those in the control group during the first two postoperative hours (p = 0.001) and lower morphine rescues needs on the second postoperative day (p = 0.003). The need for continuous morphine-ketamine perfusion was significantly lower than the need for continuous morphine perfusion on the control group (p = 0.011). Conclusion: The protocol based on the use of ketamine, managed to improve the control of postoperative pain and significantly reduce the consumption of opioids in the first 48 hours after the intervention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围手术期氯胺酮在慢性阿片类药物治疗脊柱手术患者中的应用效果
引言:最近接受脊椎手术的慢性阿片类药物患者数量有所增加。在这组患者中,视觉模拟评分(VAS)和阿片类药物消耗的提升记录更高。材料和方法:根据美国疼痛学会(APS)的建议,2018年设计了一种基于氯胺酮使用的新的术中和术后镇痛方案。术中,给药0.5mg/kg的氯胺酮,然后输注0.2mg/kg/h的剂量,直到手术伤口闭合。术后前48小时,维持吗啡-氯胺酮患者自控镇痛泵(PCA)以及对乙酰氨基酚和右酮洛芬的多模式镇痛方案。基于曲马多100 mg/6h或PCA吗啡的使用,对新方案(氯胺酮组)与前一方案(对照组)进行了有效性分析。术后前48小时,分析NVS记录、抢救镇痛需要、吗啡推注或持续输注吗啡(对照组)或氯胺酮-吗啡输注(氯胺酮组)。结果:氯胺酮组患者在术后前两小时的NVS记录低于对照组(p=0.001),术后第二天的吗啡抢救需求较低(p=0.003)。持续吗啡-氯胺酮灌注的需求显著低于对照组持续吗啡灌注的需求(p=0.011)。结论:该方案基于氯胺酮的使用,在干预后的前48小时内改善了对术后疼痛的控制,并显著减少了阿片类药物的消耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de la Sociedad Espanola del Dolor
Revista de la Sociedad Espanola del Dolor Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: BOLETÍN INFORMATIVO de la Sociedad Española del Dolor. Sociedad Española del Dolor, Suscriptores, Hospitales, Bibliotecas y Facultades de Medicina.
期刊最新文献
Gonalgia crónica: en busca de soluciones La medicina personalizada: ¿metaverso o realidad? Nuestra amiga, la grasa Efectividad de adicionar elongación de la cápsula posterior a un programa de ejercicios en pacientes con síndrome de pinzamiento subacromial: estudio clínico aleatorizado. A case of neuralgic amyotrophy after vaccination against COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1