TO THE QUESTION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CONCEPTS OF «JURISDICTION», «COGNIZANCE» AND «COMPETENCE»

Петрова Мария Юрьевна
{"title":"TO THE QUESTION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CONCEPTS OF «JURISDICTION», «COGNIZANCE» AND «COMPETENCE»","authors":"Петрова Мария Юрьевна","doi":"10.22394/2074-7306-2023-1-1-148-153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the concepts of «jurisdiction», «cognizance» and «competence» on the basis of their relationship with each other, in connection with the amendments made to the regulatory legal acts. In points to different procedural consolidation and different understanding of these concepts in the texts of the law, which, according to the author, is unacceptable, and therefore, it is proposed to introduce appropriate changes to the current legislation.","PeriodicalId":33262,"journal":{"name":"SeveroKavkazskii iuridicheskii vestnik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SeveroKavkazskii iuridicheskii vestnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2023-1-1-148-153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the concepts of «jurisdiction», «cognizance» and «competence» on the basis of their relationship with each other, in connection with the amendments made to the regulatory legal acts. In points to different procedural consolidation and different understanding of these concepts in the texts of the law, which, according to the author, is unacceptable, and therefore, it is proposed to introduce appropriate changes to the current legislation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于“管辖权”、“认定”和“能力”概念之间的关系问题
本文结合规制法律行为的修改,从“管辖权”、“认定”和“权限”三者之间的关系出发,分析了“管辖权”、“认定”和“权限”的概念。In指出法律条文中对这些概念的不同的程序巩固和不同的理解,发件人认为这是不可接受的,因此,建议对现行立法进行适当的修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The right of legislative initiative in criminal proceedings as a guarantee of elimination of legal uncertainty Thirty years of Russian Constitution Countering crimes related to embezzlement of budget funds allocated for the implementation of national projects Reform of the rules of arbitration in the framework of the dispute settlement system between foreign investors and states legal illiteracy of the growing generation and ways to solve this problem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1