BMJ Rapid Recommendations on use of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 inhibitors and ezetimibe to reduce cardiovascular risk

H. White
{"title":"BMJ Rapid Recommendations on use of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 inhibitors and ezetimibe to reduce cardiovascular risk","authors":"H. White","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The new BMJ Rapid Recommendations addressed the following question: should we add another lipidlowering drug in adults with lowdensity lipoproteincholesterol (LDLC) over 1.8 mmol/L using a maximal dose of statins or intolerant to statins? Why is this question important? Both proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and ezetimibe have been shown to reduce LDLC by approximately 60% and approximately 20%, respectively, and correspondingly may reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including allcause death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. However, the benefit of ezetimibe is small and PCSK9 inhibitors are very costly. Both drugs have adverse effects which must be considered when balancing recommendations to achieve maximal benefit and minimal harm. Current guidelines recommend differing LDLC treatment targets. Examples of thresholds include the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, which recommend an LDLC target of 1.4 mmol/L for patients at very high cardiovascular risk, and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (AHA/ACC) guidelines, which set a less aggressive LDLC target of 1.8 mmol/L. The new guideline is a collaborative initiative from the MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation (www.magicproject. org) and the BMJ. The authors performed a systematic review and network metaanalysis of 14 trials, with 83 660 participants, to define the absolute incremental beneficial effects of ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors to statins, and this is published simultaneously in the BMJ. The guideline represents a shift from the traditional focus on lipid level goals to a focus on reducing an individual’s absolute cardiovascular risk. Few other guidelines specifically do this. To apply these recommendations, clinicians need to calculate patients’ individual absolute cardiovascular risks using risk calculators applicable to specific geographical regions.","PeriodicalId":9311,"journal":{"name":"British Heart Journal","volume":"108 1","pages":"1250 - 1252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The new BMJ Rapid Recommendations addressed the following question: should we add another lipidlowering drug in adults with lowdensity lipoproteincholesterol (LDLC) over 1.8 mmol/L using a maximal dose of statins or intolerant to statins? Why is this question important? Both proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and ezetimibe have been shown to reduce LDLC by approximately 60% and approximately 20%, respectively, and correspondingly may reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including allcause death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. However, the benefit of ezetimibe is small and PCSK9 inhibitors are very costly. Both drugs have adverse effects which must be considered when balancing recommendations to achieve maximal benefit and minimal harm. Current guidelines recommend differing LDLC treatment targets. Examples of thresholds include the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, which recommend an LDLC target of 1.4 mmol/L for patients at very high cardiovascular risk, and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (AHA/ACC) guidelines, which set a less aggressive LDLC target of 1.8 mmol/L. The new guideline is a collaborative initiative from the MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation (www.magicproject. org) and the BMJ. The authors performed a systematic review and network metaanalysis of 14 trials, with 83 660 participants, to define the absolute incremental beneficial effects of ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors to statins, and this is published simultaneously in the BMJ. The guideline represents a shift from the traditional focus on lipid level goals to a focus on reducing an individual’s absolute cardiovascular risk. Few other guidelines specifically do this. To apply these recommendations, clinicians need to calculate patients’ individual absolute cardiovascular risks using risk calculators applicable to specific geographical regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BMJ快速推荐使用蛋白转化酶枯草素/酮素9抑制剂和依折麦布降低心血管风险
新的BMJ快速推荐解决了以下问题:对于低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDLC)超过1.8 mmol/L的成人,我们是否应该使用最大剂量的他汀类药物或对他汀类药物不耐受的他汀类药物添加另一种降脂药物?为什么这个问题很重要?蛋白转化酶枯草杆菌素/ keexin 9型(PCSK9)抑制剂和依折替米贝均可分别降低LDLC约60%和约20%,并相应减少主要不良心血管事件(MACE),包括全因死亡、心血管死亡、心肌梗死(MI)和中风。然而,依zetimibe的益处很小,而且PCSK9抑制剂非常昂贵。这两种药物都有副作用,在平衡推荐时必须考虑到这一点,以实现最大的益处和最小的危害。目前的指南推荐不同的LDLC治疗目标。阈值的例子包括欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)指南,该指南建议心血管风险极高的患者的LDLC目标为1.4 mmol/L,美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(AHA/ACC)指南将LDLC目标设定为1.8 mmol/L。新指南是MAGIC证据生态系统基金会(www.magicproject)的一项合作倡议。org)和英国医学杂志。作者对14项试验进行了系统回顾和网络荟萃分析,共有83,660名参与者,以确定ezetimibe和PCSK9抑制剂对他汀类药物的绝对增量有益作用,并同时发表在BMJ上。该指南代表了从传统的关注血脂水平目标到关注降低个人心血管绝对风险的转变。很少有其他指南专门这样做。为了应用这些建议,临床医生需要使用适用于特定地理区域的风险计算器来计算患者的个体绝对心血管风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A retrospective review of empiric acyclovir prescribing practices for suspected viral central nervous system infections: A single-centre study. Cortical Morphology in Cannabis Use Disorder: Implications for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment. Socioeconomic status and entrepreneurial networking responses to the COVID-19 crisis. Cardiac microstructural alterations measured by echocardiography identify sex-specific risk for heart failure. Aspirin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1