Renal arterial resistive index as a prognostic marker in lupus nephritis patients

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Nefrologia Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.nefro.2023.07.003
Samir Kamal Abdul Hamid , Ashraf Elshazly , Yasser Abd Elmawgood Faisal , Kawsar Abdel Halim M.saleh , Mai Mostafa Aly
{"title":"Renal arterial resistive index as a prognostic marker in lupus nephritis patients","authors":"Samir Kamal Abdul Hamid ,&nbsp;Ashraf Elshazly ,&nbsp;Yasser Abd Elmawgood Faisal ,&nbsp;Kawsar Abdel Halim M.saleh ,&nbsp;Mai Mostafa Aly","doi":"10.1016/j.nefro.2023.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Lupus nephritis (LN) is known to be one of the most serious complications of SLE and it is a major predictor of poor prognosis. Despite the improvement in understanding the pathophysiology of lupus nephritis and greater improvement in diagnostic approaches, lupus nephritis patients have poorer outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Study the relation between renal resistive index (RRI) and renal function and histopathological parameters in lupus nephritis (LN) patients. Also to investigate the usefulness of RRI in predicting response to treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>This study included 126 patients who were split into two groups (group 1: 101 LN patients and group 2: 25 SLE patients without renal affection); and 100 healthy controls (group 3). The RRI was measured for all participants through a colored Doppler ultrasound examination. LN patients underwent renal biopsy and received their therapy and were followed up for 6 months.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The RRI was significantly greater in the LN group (mean<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->SD; 0.64<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.07) than in SLE patients without nephritis (0.5884<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.04) (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001). The RRI was greater in LN class IV (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001). RRI significantly correlated with the chronicity index (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.704, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001), activity index (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.310, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002), and serum creatinine (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.607, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001) and negatively correlated with eGFR (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.719, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001). Almost eighty-five percent (84.8%) of LN patients responded to induction therapy. RRI was significantly greater in the nonresponder group (mean<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->SD, 0.73<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.02) than that in the responder group (0.63<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->.07) (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001). All non-responders to induction therapy while only 29.8% of responders had an RRI of ˃0.7. RRI, according to regression analysis was a significant predictor of response to treatment in LN patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>RRI was significantly greater in the LN group and significantly correlated with kidney function and histopathological parameters. RRI can predict response to induction therapy in LN patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18997,"journal":{"name":"Nefrologia","volume":"44 3","pages":"Pages 373-381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0211699523001194/pdfft?md5=8cb41bcff6d05337b685541d343abd39&pid=1-s2.0-S0211699523001194-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nefrologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0211699523001194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Lupus nephritis (LN) is known to be one of the most serious complications of SLE and it is a major predictor of poor prognosis. Despite the improvement in understanding the pathophysiology of lupus nephritis and greater improvement in diagnostic approaches, lupus nephritis patients have poorer outcomes.

Objectives

Study the relation between renal resistive index (RRI) and renal function and histopathological parameters in lupus nephritis (LN) patients. Also to investigate the usefulness of RRI in predicting response to treatment.

Patients and methods

This study included 126 patients who were split into two groups (group 1: 101 LN patients and group 2: 25 SLE patients without renal affection); and 100 healthy controls (group 3). The RRI was measured for all participants through a colored Doppler ultrasound examination. LN patients underwent renal biopsy and received their therapy and were followed up for 6 months.

Results

The RRI was significantly greater in the LN group (mean ± SD; 0.64 ± 0.07) than in SLE patients without nephritis (0.5884 ± 0.04) (P < 0.0001). The RRI was greater in LN class IV (P < 0.0001). RRI significantly correlated with the chronicity index (r = 0.704, P < 0.0001), activity index (r = 0.310, P = 0.002), and serum creatinine (r = 0.607, P < 0.0001) and negatively correlated with eGFR (r = −0.719, P < 0.0001). Almost eighty-five percent (84.8%) of LN patients responded to induction therapy. RRI was significantly greater in the nonresponder group (mean ± SD, 0.73 ± 0.02) than that in the responder group (0.63 ± .07) (P < 0.0001). All non-responders to induction therapy while only 29.8% of responders had an RRI of ˃0.7. RRI, according to regression analysis was a significant predictor of response to treatment in LN patients.

Conclusion

RRI was significantly greater in the LN group and significantly correlated with kidney function and histopathological parameters. RRI can predict response to induction therapy in LN patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾动脉阻力指数作为狼疮性肾炎患者预后指标
引言 众所周知,狼疮性肾炎(LN)是系统性红斑狼疮最严重的并发症之一,也是预后不良的主要预测因素。尽管人们对狼疮性肾炎的病理生理学有了进一步的了解,诊断方法也有了更大的改进,但狼疮性肾炎患者的预后仍然较差。患者和方法本研究将 126 名患者分为两组(第 1 组:101 名狼疮肾炎患者;第 2 组:25 名无肾脏疾病的系统性红斑狼疮患者)和 100 名健康对照组(第 3 组)。所有参与者都通过彩色多普勒超声检查测量了 RRI。结果 LN 组的 RRI(平均值 ± SD;0.64 ± 0.07)明显高于无肾炎的系统性红斑狼疮患者(0.5884 ± 0.04)(P < 0.0001)。LN IV 级患者的 RRI 更大(P < 0.0001)。RRI 与慢性指数(r = 0.704,P < 0.0001)、活动指数(r = 0.310,P = 0.002)和血清肌酐(r = 0.607,P < 0.0001)明显相关,与 eGFR 呈负相关(r = -0.719,P < 0.0001)。近85%(84.8%)的LN患者对诱导治疗有反应。无应答组的 RRI(平均值 ± SD,0.73 ± 0.02)明显高于应答组(0.63 ± .07)(P < 0.0001)。所有对诱导治疗无反应者的 RRI 均为˃0.7,而只有 29.8% 的反应者的 RRI 为˃0.7。根据回归分析,RRI 是预测 LN 患者治疗反应的重要指标。RRI可预测LN患者对诱导治疗的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nefrologia
Nefrologia 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
148
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Nefrología is the official publication of the Spanish Society of Nephrology. The Journal publishes articles on basic or clinical research relating to nephrology, arterial hypertension, dialysis and kidney transplants. It is governed by the peer review system and all original papers are subject to internal assessment and external reviews. The journal accepts submissions of articles in English and in Spanish languages.
期刊最新文献
Nefritis lúpica: 10 cuestiones para pensar Anosmia, dysgeusia and malnutrition in chronic kidney disease: A systematic review Etelcalcetide: What we know eight years since its approval Estudio genético en adultos con glomeruloesclerosis focal y segmentaria Long-term outcomes after AKI in hospitalized patients with COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1