Bulk sediment 14C dating in an estuarine environment: How accurate can it be?

B. Lougheed, S. Obrochta, C. Lenz, A. Mellström, B. Metcalfe, R. Muscheler, Maja Reinholdsson, I. Snowball, L. Zillén
{"title":"Bulk sediment 14C dating in an estuarine environment: How accurate can it be?","authors":"B. Lougheed, S. Obrochta, C. Lenz, A. Mellström, B. Metcalfe, R. Muscheler, Maja Reinholdsson, I. Snowball, L. Zillén","doi":"10.1002/2016PA002960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Due to a lack of marine macrofossils in many sediment cores from the estuarine Baltic Sea, researchers are often forced to carry out 14C determinations on bulk sediment samples. However, ambiguity surrounding the carbon source pathways that contribute to bulk sediment formation introduces a large uncertainty into 14C geochronologies based on such samples, and such uncertainty may not have been fully considered in previous Baltic Sea studies. We quantify this uncertainty by analyzing bulk sediment 14C determinations carried out on densely spaced intervals in independently dated late-Holocene sediment sequences from two central Baltic Sea cores. Our results show a difference of ~600?14C?yr in median bulk sediment reservoir age, or R(t)bulk, between the two core locations (~1200?14C?yr for one core, ~620?14C?yr for the other), indicating large spatial variation. Furthermore, we also find large downcore (i.e., temporal) R(t)bulk variation of at least ~200?14C?yr for both cores. We also find a difference of 585?14C?yr between two samples taken from the same core depth. We propose that studies using bulk sediment 14C dating in large brackish water bodies should take such spatiotemporal variation in R(t)bulk into account when assessing uncertainties, thus leading to a larger, but more accurate, calibrated age range. (Less)","PeriodicalId":19882,"journal":{"name":"Paleoceanography","volume":"32 1","pages":"123-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/2016PA002960","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paleoceanography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/2016PA002960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Abstract Due to a lack of marine macrofossils in many sediment cores from the estuarine Baltic Sea, researchers are often forced to carry out 14C determinations on bulk sediment samples. However, ambiguity surrounding the carbon source pathways that contribute to bulk sediment formation introduces a large uncertainty into 14C geochronologies based on such samples, and such uncertainty may not have been fully considered in previous Baltic Sea studies. We quantify this uncertainty by analyzing bulk sediment 14C determinations carried out on densely spaced intervals in independently dated late-Holocene sediment sequences from two central Baltic Sea cores. Our results show a difference of ~600?14C?yr in median bulk sediment reservoir age, or R(t)bulk, between the two core locations (~1200?14C?yr for one core, ~620?14C?yr for the other), indicating large spatial variation. Furthermore, we also find large downcore (i.e., temporal) R(t)bulk variation of at least ~200?14C?yr for both cores. We also find a difference of 585?14C?yr between two samples taken from the same core depth. We propose that studies using bulk sediment 14C dating in large brackish water bodies should take such spatiotemporal variation in R(t)bulk into account when assessing uncertainties, thus leading to a larger, but more accurate, calibrated age range. (Less)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
河口环境中的大块沉积物14C定年:它能有多精确?
摘要由于波罗的海河口的许多沉积物岩芯中缺乏海洋大化石,研究人员经常被迫对大量沉积物样本进行14C测定。然而,围绕有助于大量沉积物形成的碳源途径的模糊性给基于这些样本的14C地质年代法带来了很大的不确定性,而且在以前的波罗的海研究中可能没有充分考虑到这种不确定性。我们通过分析波罗的海中部两个岩芯中独立测年的全新世晚期沉积物序列中密集间隔进行的散装沉积物14C测定,来量化这种不确定性。我们的结果显示差异约为600?14C?两个岩芯位置之间的中位散装沉积物储层年龄yr,或R(t)散装(一个岩芯约1200?14C?yr,另一个约620?14C!yr),表明空间变化较大。此外,我们还发现大的下芯(即时间)R(t)体积变化至少约为200?14C?年。我们还发现了585?14C?从相同岩心深度采集的两个样本之间的年。我们建议,在评估不确定性时,在大型微咸水水体中使用散装沉积物14C定年的研究应考虑R(t)散装的这种时空变化,从而得出更大但更准确的校准年龄范围。(减)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Paleoceanography
Paleoceanography 地学-地球科学综合
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mid-Piacenzian variability of Nordic Seas surface circulation linked to terrestrial climatic change in Norway The Northern Gulf of Mexico During OAE2 and the Relationship Between Water Depth and Black Shale Development The Evolution of Deep Ocean Chemistry and Respired Carbon in the Eastern Equatorial Pacific Over the Last Deglaciation Understanding the Effects of Dissolution on the Mg/Ca Paleothermometer in Planktic Foraminifera: Evidence From a Novel Individual Foraminifera Method: Planktic Foram Mg/Ca Dissolution Effects A Reconstruction of Subtropical Western North Pacific SST Variability Back to 1578, Based on a Porites Coral Sr/Ca Record from the Northern Ryukyus, Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1