Investigating the Shortcomings of Urban Development Plans in Iran and Factors Affecting Their Unrealizability (Case Study: Master Plan Approved in 2016 in Tabriz)

Shahrokh ZADVALI KHAJEH, Akbar ASGHARI ZAMANI
{"title":"Investigating the Shortcomings of Urban Development Plans in Iran and Factors Affecting Their Unrealizability (Case Study: Master Plan Approved in 2016 in Tabriz)","authors":"Shahrokh ZADVALI KHAJEH, Akbar ASGHARI ZAMANI","doi":"10.1142/s2345748122500257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent decades, the unbalanced development of Iranian cities and the advent of many problems in various social, cultural, economic, physical and environmental dimensions have resulted inevitably in the need to use urban development plans to advance the spatio-physical condition of cities. In this regard, about five decades have passed since the start of the preparation of urban development plans in Iran; but despite gaining a lot of experience by producers and executors of urban affairs, in practice, urban projects have not been able to take a positive step in the direction of programmed development. Therefore, by detecting the causes of unachievability and failure of these plans, it is possible to prepare realistic and executive plans. Hence, this study seeks to investigate the shortcomings of the master plan approved in 2016 in Tabriz and identify the factors affecting its unrealizability by using the qualitative methods (Delphi and case study methods). Among the most significant reasons for the impracticability of this plan, the following should be mentioned: (1) the inadequacy of the design model (positivism, belief system, obligation, inductive reasoning, centrism and being government-centered); (2) inadequacy in the content of the plan (being governmental and non-participatory, inadequate subjectology and collection of irrelevant data, lack of segregation of interventions in different contexts, lack of an organized monitoring system, mere physical emphases, lack of definition of executive financial possibilities, perfectionism, lack of attention to relativism and inflexibility and lack of connection between the elements and components of the plan); and (3) inadequacy of the plan proposals and strategies (emphasis on quantity, incomplete inference, inefficiency and not including all levels and strata).","PeriodicalId":43051,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2345748122500257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent decades, the unbalanced development of Iranian cities and the advent of many problems in various social, cultural, economic, physical and environmental dimensions have resulted inevitably in the need to use urban development plans to advance the spatio-physical condition of cities. In this regard, about five decades have passed since the start of the preparation of urban development plans in Iran; but despite gaining a lot of experience by producers and executors of urban affairs, in practice, urban projects have not been able to take a positive step in the direction of programmed development. Therefore, by detecting the causes of unachievability and failure of these plans, it is possible to prepare realistic and executive plans. Hence, this study seeks to investigate the shortcomings of the master plan approved in 2016 in Tabriz and identify the factors affecting its unrealizability by using the qualitative methods (Delphi and case study methods). Among the most significant reasons for the impracticability of this plan, the following should be mentioned: (1) the inadequacy of the design model (positivism, belief system, obligation, inductive reasoning, centrism and being government-centered); (2) inadequacy in the content of the plan (being governmental and non-participatory, inadequate subjectology and collection of irrelevant data, lack of segregation of interventions in different contexts, lack of an organized monitoring system, mere physical emphases, lack of definition of executive financial possibilities, perfectionism, lack of attention to relativism and inflexibility and lack of connection between the elements and components of the plan); and (3) inadequacy of the plan proposals and strategies (emphasis on quantity, incomplete inference, inefficiency and not including all levels and strata).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查伊朗城市发展规划的缺陷及其无法实现的影响因素(以大不里士市2016年批准的总体规划为例)
近几十年来,伊朗城市发展的不平衡以及各种社会、文化、经济、物理和环境方面的许多问题的出现,不可避免地导致了利用城市发展计划来改善城市的空间-物理条件的必要性。在这方面,自伊朗开始编制城市发展计划以来,已经过去了大约50年;但是,尽管城市事务的生产者和执行者积累了大量的经验,但在实践中,城市项目并没有朝着程序化发展的方向迈出积极的一步。因此,通过检测这些计划无法实现和失败的原因,可以制定现实的执行计划。因此,本研究试图调查大不里士2016年批准的总体规划的不足之处,并通过定性方法(德尔菲和案例研究方法)确定影响其不可实现性的因素。在该计划不可行的最重要原因中,应该提到以下几点:(1)设计模式的不足(实证主义、信仰体系、义务、归纳推理、中心主义和以政府为中心);(2) 计划内容的不足(政府和非参与性,主题学和收集不相关数据不足,在不同背景下缺乏干预措施的隔离,缺乏有组织的监测系统,仅仅是身体上的重点,缺乏对行政财务可能性的定义,完美主义,缺乏对相对主义和灵活性的关注,以及要素与计划的组成部分);(3)计划建议和战略的不足(强调数量、推理不完全、效率低下,没有包括所有层面和阶层)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Climate Change Effects on Employment in the Nigeria’s Agricultural Sector Ecotourism Potential: A Bibliometric Review Assessment of the Vulnerability of Riverine Cities and Their Coping Capacity against Floods (Case Study: Ahvaz Metropolis) The Evaluation and Obstacle Identification of Urban Infrastructure Resilience in China Mindscape and Its Effect on Cities’ Sustainability: A Case Study of Bronzeville Neighborhood — Chicago
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1