What influence the performance of banks? Evidence from public sector banks in India

IF 2.1 Q3 BUSINESS Journal of Indian Business Research Pub Date : 2022-11-15 DOI:10.1108/jibr-04-2022-0112
N. J. Kantharia, Jivan P. Biradar
{"title":"What influence the performance of banks? Evidence from public sector banks in India","authors":"N. J. Kantharia, Jivan P. Biradar","doi":"10.1108/jibr-04-2022-0112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nEvery shock, starting from the banking sector reform in 1992 to the global crisis due to Covid-19 pandemic, affects the performance of banks. The shocks and transformations jeopardise the bank’s performance. This study cover period of 30 years starting from 1992. So, the reason behind taking only public sector banks is that after 1991–92 many banking sector reforms took place, and many new private sector banks and foreign sector banks entered into competition due to the liberalization, privatization, globalization (LPG) policy. So, it has been difficult for public sector bank to manage their performance in a competitive market. So, the purpose of this study is to find out influencing factors of bank performance especially public sector bank, because, it has been vital to identify factors influencing their performance.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe current study explores the determinant of the performance of public sector banks in India. Currently, in India, 12 banks are public sector banks, which capture 59.8% market share in the banking industry. After 1994 new licences were issued by Reserve Bank of India for many banks, and foreign sector banks entered the market as an effect of LPG policy, and market competition is one of the significant determinants of the performance of banks. Thus, the panel regression model is used to analyse the impact of various determinants on the performance of public sector banks (from 1992 to 2021). Return on equity and return on assets are used as indicators of performance, whereas influencing factors are divided into two parts, bank-specific factors, which include bank size, asset quality (AQ), liquidity, credit deposit ratio (CDR), capital adequacy, debt-equity ratio, employee’s productivity and macroeconomic factors which include inflation rate, tax rate and gross domestic product (GDP).\n\n\nFindings\nResults of the study show that bank size is not an essential factor for measuring bank performance because it is insignificant with both indicators of performance. AQ, liquidity ratio and CDR are significant in both models with negative impact. Macroeconomic factors like GDP are insignificant with both indicators with positive relations and tax rates are significant with a positive relationship. The inflation rate is significant but affects negatively to performance.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study only focuses on public sector banks. So, the results for private and foreign sector banks might differ. Considering the larger market share compared to other sector banks, the authors are focusing on public sector banks only. Foreign banks and cooperative banks are not included current analysis because of huge numbers and different working environments.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nDetermining influencing factors of bank performance is crucial because it will help the bank take various policy implications and formulation. Since independence measuring bank performance are important area.\n","PeriodicalId":45364,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Business Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jibr-04-2022-0112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose Every shock, starting from the banking sector reform in 1992 to the global crisis due to Covid-19 pandemic, affects the performance of banks. The shocks and transformations jeopardise the bank’s performance. This study cover period of 30 years starting from 1992. So, the reason behind taking only public sector banks is that after 1991–92 many banking sector reforms took place, and many new private sector banks and foreign sector banks entered into competition due to the liberalization, privatization, globalization (LPG) policy. So, it has been difficult for public sector bank to manage their performance in a competitive market. So, the purpose of this study is to find out influencing factors of bank performance especially public sector bank, because, it has been vital to identify factors influencing their performance. Design/methodology/approach The current study explores the determinant of the performance of public sector banks in India. Currently, in India, 12 banks are public sector banks, which capture 59.8% market share in the banking industry. After 1994 new licences were issued by Reserve Bank of India for many banks, and foreign sector banks entered the market as an effect of LPG policy, and market competition is one of the significant determinants of the performance of banks. Thus, the panel regression model is used to analyse the impact of various determinants on the performance of public sector banks (from 1992 to 2021). Return on equity and return on assets are used as indicators of performance, whereas influencing factors are divided into two parts, bank-specific factors, which include bank size, asset quality (AQ), liquidity, credit deposit ratio (CDR), capital adequacy, debt-equity ratio, employee’s productivity and macroeconomic factors which include inflation rate, tax rate and gross domestic product (GDP). Findings Results of the study show that bank size is not an essential factor for measuring bank performance because it is insignificant with both indicators of performance. AQ, liquidity ratio and CDR are significant in both models with negative impact. Macroeconomic factors like GDP are insignificant with both indicators with positive relations and tax rates are significant with a positive relationship. The inflation rate is significant but affects negatively to performance. Research limitations/implications This study only focuses on public sector banks. So, the results for private and foreign sector banks might differ. Considering the larger market share compared to other sector banks, the authors are focusing on public sector banks only. Foreign banks and cooperative banks are not included current analysis because of huge numbers and different working environments. Originality/value Determining influencing factors of bank performance is crucial because it will help the bank take various policy implications and formulation. Since independence measuring bank performance are important area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响银行业绩的因素是什么?来自印度公共部门银行的证据
从1992年的银行业改革到2019冠状病毒病大流行引发的全球危机,每一次冲击都会影响银行的业绩。冲击和转型危及世行的业绩。本研究从1992年开始,历时30年。因此,只考虑公共部门银行的原因是1991-92年之后发生了许多银行业改革,许多新的私营部门银行和外国部门银行由于自由化,私有化,全球化(LPG)政策而进入竞争。因此,公共银行很难在竞争激烈的市场中管理业绩。因此,本研究的目的是找出影响银行绩效的因素,特别是公共部门银行,因为确定影响其绩效的因素是至关重要的。设计/方法/方法当前的研究探讨了印度公共部门银行绩效的决定因素。目前,在印度,有12家银行是公共部门银行,占银行业59.8%的市场份额。1994年以后,印度储备银行向许多银行颁发了新的许可证,由于液化石油气政策的影响,外国部门的银行进入了市场,市场竞争是银行业绩的重要决定因素之一。因此,面板回归模型用于分析各种决定因素对公共部门银行绩效的影响(从1992年到2021年)。净资产收益率和资产收益率作为绩效指标,而影响因素分为两部分:银行特定因素,包括银行规模、资产质量(AQ)、流动性、信贷存款比率(CDR)、资本充足率、债务-权益比率、员工生产率;宏观经济因素,包括通货膨胀率、税率和国内生产总值(GDP)。研究结果表明,银行规模不是衡量银行绩效的必要因素,因为它与两项绩效指标都不显著。AQ、流动性比率和CDR在两个模型中均显著负向影响。GDP等宏观经济因素不显著,两项指标均为正相关,税率显著,呈正相关。通货膨胀率是显著的,但对业绩有负面影响。研究局限/启示本研究仅关注公共部门银行。因此,私营银行和外资银行的结果可能有所不同。考虑到与其他部门银行相比,公共部门银行的市场份额更大,作者只关注公共部门银行。外资银行和合作银行由于数量庞大,工作环境不同,目前的分析没有包括在内。独创性/价值确定银行绩效的影响因素至关重要,因为它将有助于银行采取各种政策暗示和制定。由于独立性,衡量银行绩效是一个重要的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Examining the relationship between organizational capabilities and business sustainability among start-ups: a dynamic capability view Empowering sustainability: understanding the users’ perceptions on the adoption of renewable energy technologies (RETs) through a systematic literature review Navigating GST revenue efficiency challenges: a solution to dilemma of policy makers for enhancing revenue efficiency Work-related boredom, felt deprivation and employee dissatisfaction: is being closer to the leader a bane? Financial literacy and its impact on life satisfaction in rural households: a mediated approach via financial self-efficacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1