Lost (and Found) in Translation – Queer ‘Wedding-Engagement’ Tactics in Poland

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Research Online Pub Date : 2022-10-14 DOI:10.1177/13607804221122461
Agata Stasińska
{"title":"Lost (and Found) in Translation – Queer ‘Wedding-Engagement’ Tactics in Poland","authors":"Agata Stasińska","doi":"10.1177/13607804221122461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many Western countries, LGBTQ couples experience the ‘after marriage era’, allowing them to cherish their intimate bonds openly and legally. Meanwhile, Poland remains the biggest country in the European Union, refusing legal recognition. Some LGBTQ couples from Poland decide to get married or enter into a civil partnership abroad, which is not recognised by the Polish state. Many invent their own couple rituals to celebrate their relationships. The article critically engages with Western scholarship on queer weddings, commitment ceremonies, and couple rituals, mainly analysed through the polarised notions of subversion versus normativity. In contrast, the present article proposes to go beyond this dichotomy and apply a more tender and nuanced research approach. It maps a broader repertoire of naming, timing, and displaying tactics entangled in the local socio-political and cultural context where these couple rituals are developed. The article argues that these tactics are developed not only regardless of lack of legal recognition, but also that the socio-political context deeply influences how these rituals are shaped. It also demonstrates how notions of authenticity and agency transgress the dichotomy between subversion versus normativity often applied in analysing such rituals. The article concludes by sharing research implications and future paths for research on queer couple rituals. The article draws on 53 individual in-depth narrative interviews and a monthly ethnographic study conducted with 21 non-heterosexual families done within the Families of Choice in Poland research project.","PeriodicalId":47694,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Research Online","volume":"27 1","pages":"984 - 1002"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Research Online","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804221122461","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In many Western countries, LGBTQ couples experience the ‘after marriage era’, allowing them to cherish their intimate bonds openly and legally. Meanwhile, Poland remains the biggest country in the European Union, refusing legal recognition. Some LGBTQ couples from Poland decide to get married or enter into a civil partnership abroad, which is not recognised by the Polish state. Many invent their own couple rituals to celebrate their relationships. The article critically engages with Western scholarship on queer weddings, commitment ceremonies, and couple rituals, mainly analysed through the polarised notions of subversion versus normativity. In contrast, the present article proposes to go beyond this dichotomy and apply a more tender and nuanced research approach. It maps a broader repertoire of naming, timing, and displaying tactics entangled in the local socio-political and cultural context where these couple rituals are developed. The article argues that these tactics are developed not only regardless of lack of legal recognition, but also that the socio-political context deeply influences how these rituals are shaped. It also demonstrates how notions of authenticity and agency transgress the dichotomy between subversion versus normativity often applied in analysing such rituals. The article concludes by sharing research implications and future paths for research on queer couple rituals. The article draws on 53 individual in-depth narrative interviews and a monthly ethnographic study conducted with 21 non-heterosexual families done within the Families of Choice in Poland research project.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
翻译中的失物招领——波兰女王的“订婚”策略
在许多西方国家,LGBTQ夫妇经历了“婚后时代”,允许他们公开和合法地珍惜他们的亲密关系。与此同时,波兰仍然是欧盟最大的国家,拒绝获得法律承认。一些来自波兰的LGBTQ伴侣决定在国外结婚或进入民事伴侣关系,这是波兰国家不承认的。许多人发明了自己的夫妻仪式来庆祝他们的关系。这篇文章批判性地结合了西方关于酷儿婚礼、承诺仪式和夫妻仪式的学术研究,主要通过颠覆与规范的两极分化概念进行分析。相比之下,本文建议超越这种二分法,并应用更温柔和细致入微的研究方法。它描绘了更广泛的命名、时间和展示策略,这些策略与这些夫妻仪式发展的当地社会政治和文化背景有关。文章认为,这些策略的发展不仅不考虑缺乏法律承认,而且社会政治背景深刻影响了这些仪式的形成方式。它还展示了真实性和代理的概念如何超越了颠覆与规范性之间的二分法,这些二分法通常用于分析此类仪式。文章最后分享了酷儿夫妻仪式研究的启示和未来的研究方向。这篇文章借鉴了53个深入的个人叙述访谈,以及在波兰家庭选择研究项目中对21个非异性恋家庭进行的月度人种学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Sociological Research Online has been published quarterly online since March 1996. Articles published in the journal are peer-reviewed by a distinguished Editorial Board and qualify for inclusion in the UK Research Assessment Exercise. Sociological Research Online was established under the Electronic Libraries Programme (eLib). When funding ceased in September 1998, Sociological Research Online introduced institutional subscriptions in order to be able to continue publishing high quality sociology. The journal is still available without charge to individuals accessing it from non-institutional networks.
期刊最新文献
‘Vulnerability’ at Work: Instrumental Vulnerabilities Among Software Professionals The Persistence of the University Dream: Class and Social Mobility as Projected by Students at a Chilean University Transnational Affect and the Making of a Moral Public: The War on Drugs in the Philippines ‘I’ve Wondered Why Am I Here?’ Expectations of Old Age and the Ageing Body in a Longitudinal Study of a Dance Group Hoof Work: The Feminisation of Donkeys in Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1