Other Side of Voluntary Clawback Provisions in Executive Compensation Contracts: Evidence from the Investment Efficiency

Sohyung Kim, Cheol Lee, Santanu Mitra
{"title":"Other Side of Voluntary Clawback Provisions in Executive Compensation Contracts: Evidence from the Investment Efficiency","authors":"Sohyung Kim, Cheol Lee, Santanu Mitra","doi":"10.1142/s0219091522500011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines how firm-initiated clawback provisions in executive compensation contracts affect firms’ investment efficiency. While existing the literature provides evidence on positive aspects of adopting clawback provisions, the potential impact of clawback adoption on firms’ long-term investment efficiency remains unexplored. Using three investment proxies (i.e., capital expenditure, new investment, and total investment), we find that clawback adopters tend to reduce their long-term investments after the clawback provisions are put in place, compared to nonadopters. In particular, we find evidence that the adoption of clawback policies decreases the investment efficiency in the post-adoption period, especially for the firms whose ex ante probability of underinvestment is high. Our additional analyses reveal that observed reduction in the investment efficiency for the firms that are likely to underinvest is more evident for the firms with financial con straints and the firms that adopt risk-taking and performance-based clawback triggers. In contrast, the clawback adopters that are likely to overinvest do not change their investment behavior in the post-adoption period. Overall, our findings suggest that the impleme ntation of clawback provisions may lead to unintended consequences for firms’ long-term investment practices, resulting in a decrease in the investment efficiency.","PeriodicalId":45653,"journal":{"name":"Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219091522500011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines how firm-initiated clawback provisions in executive compensation contracts affect firms’ investment efficiency. While existing the literature provides evidence on positive aspects of adopting clawback provisions, the potential impact of clawback adoption on firms’ long-term investment efficiency remains unexplored. Using three investment proxies (i.e., capital expenditure, new investment, and total investment), we find that clawback adopters tend to reduce their long-term investments after the clawback provisions are put in place, compared to nonadopters. In particular, we find evidence that the adoption of clawback policies decreases the investment efficiency in the post-adoption period, especially for the firms whose ex ante probability of underinvestment is high. Our additional analyses reveal that observed reduction in the investment efficiency for the firms that are likely to underinvest is more evident for the firms with financial con straints and the firms that adopt risk-taking and performance-based clawback triggers. In contrast, the clawback adopters that are likely to overinvest do not change their investment behavior in the post-adoption period. Overall, our findings suggest that the impleme ntation of clawback provisions may lead to unintended consequences for firms’ long-term investment practices, resulting in a decrease in the investment efficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高管薪酬合同中自愿回购条款的另一面——来自投资效率的证据
本研究考察了高管薪酬合同中企业发起的追回条款如何影响企业的投资效率。虽然现有文献提供了采用追回条款的积极方面的证据,但追回条款的采用对公司长期投资效率的潜在影响仍未得到探索。使用三种投资指标(即资本支出、新投资和总投资),我们发现,与不采用追回条款的人相比,追回条款的采用者往往会在追回条款实施后减少其长期投资。特别是,我们发现有证据表明,采用追回政策会降低采用后时期的投资效率,尤其是对于那些事前投资不足概率很高的公司。我们的额外分析表明,观察到的可能投资不足的公司的投资效率下降,对于有财务约束的公司和采用冒险和基于绩效的追回触发因素的公司来说更为明显。相比之下,可能过度投资的追回采用者在采用后的时期不会改变他们的投资行为。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,追回条款的实施可能会对企业的长期投资行为产生意想不到的后果,导致投资效率下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: This journal concentrates on global interdisciplinary research in finance, economics and accounting. The major topics include: 1. Business, economic and financial relations among the Pacific rim countries. 2. Financial markets and industries. 3. Options and futures markets of the United States and other Pacific rim countries. 4. International accounting issues related to U.S. companies investing in Pacific rim countries. 5. The issue of and strategy for developing Tokyo, Taipei, Shanghai, Sydney, Seoul, Hong Kong, Singapore, Kuala Lumpur, Bangkok, Jakarta, and Manila as international or regional financial centers. 6. Global monetary and foreign exchange policy, and 7. Other high quality interdisciplinary research in global accounting, business, economics and finance.
期刊最新文献
Tribute to James R. Barth (1943–2023) About Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) Analyzing Spillover effects among BRICS Stock Markets: Application of Copula and DCC- MGARCH model COVID-19, Stock Liquidity, and Abnormal Returns Carbon Pricing and Stock Performance: Evidence from China's Emissions Trading Scheme Pilot Regions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1