Electrophysiological Difference in Obstructive Sleep Apnea with and without REM sleep Behavior Disorder: Cardiopulmonary Coupling Analysis

Y. Park, S. Choi, E. Joo
{"title":"Electrophysiological Difference in Obstructive Sleep Apnea with and without REM sleep Behavior Disorder: Cardiopulmonary Coupling Analysis","authors":"Y. Park, S. Choi, E. Joo","doi":"10.4172/2167-0277.1000261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Although rapid eye movement behavior disorder (RBD) and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) have different pathophysiology, RBD patients with OSA appeared to have more stable sleep compared to patients with OSA and to verify it by cardiopulmonary coupling (CPC) method. \nMethods: The polysomnography (PSG) data of 138 subjects with OSA (AHI ≥ 15), RBD with OSA (AHI ≥ 15), RBD, normal control (N=32, 26, 29, 51, respectively) were collected. For conducting case control study between RBD with OSA and patients with OSA only, a total of 32 OSA controls, matched for age, AHI and BMI were recruited. CPC parameters were obtained using CPC analyzer in Rem Logic. Sleep spectrogram by CPC analyses revealed the percentage of stable tidal volume [high-frequency coupling (HFC), 0.1–0.4 Hz] and fluctuation tidal volume [lowfrequency coupling (LFC), 0.01 Hz to 0.1 Hz)] during sleep. \nResults: Although there was no significant Apnea-Hypopnea index (AHI) difference between RBD with OSA and OSA group (AHI 29.1 ± 15.6/hr vs. 34.1 ± 18.9, p=0.332), there was significant difference in CPC measurements. In RBD-OSA group showed lower LFC (35.9 ± 16.8 vs. 49.7 ± 21.3, p=0.010) than OSA group. Unlike higher AHI in RBD with OSA than RBD group (29.1 ± 15.6/hr vs. 3.2 ± 1.6, p<0.001), there was no significant difference in CPC study. Both OSA group and RBD with OSA group showed higher LFC (OSA vs. normal: 49.7 ± 21.3 vs. 28.4 ± 13.3, p<0.001, RBD with OSA vs. normal: 35.9 ± 16.8 vs. 28.4 ± 13.2 p=0.035) and lower HFC (OSA vs. normal: 37.5 ± 20.0 vs. 56.2 ± 16.2, p<0.001, RBD with OSA vs. normal: 46.8 ± 20.8 vs. 56.2 ± 16.2, p=0.031) when compared with normal control group, respectively. \nConclusions: In terms of autonomic-respiratory interaction, RBD with OSA showed similar CPC profile (higher LFC and lower HFC than normal) to OSA group but less severe than pure OSA group. It suggests that RBD may have a protective effect on OSA.","PeriodicalId":73946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of sleep disorders & therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2167-0277.1000261","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of sleep disorders & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0277.1000261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Although rapid eye movement behavior disorder (RBD) and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) have different pathophysiology, RBD patients with OSA appeared to have more stable sleep compared to patients with OSA and to verify it by cardiopulmonary coupling (CPC) method. Methods: The polysomnography (PSG) data of 138 subjects with OSA (AHI ≥ 15), RBD with OSA (AHI ≥ 15), RBD, normal control (N=32, 26, 29, 51, respectively) were collected. For conducting case control study between RBD with OSA and patients with OSA only, a total of 32 OSA controls, matched for age, AHI and BMI were recruited. CPC parameters were obtained using CPC analyzer in Rem Logic. Sleep spectrogram by CPC analyses revealed the percentage of stable tidal volume [high-frequency coupling (HFC), 0.1–0.4 Hz] and fluctuation tidal volume [lowfrequency coupling (LFC), 0.01 Hz to 0.1 Hz)] during sleep. Results: Although there was no significant Apnea-Hypopnea index (AHI) difference between RBD with OSA and OSA group (AHI 29.1 ± 15.6/hr vs. 34.1 ± 18.9, p=0.332), there was significant difference in CPC measurements. In RBD-OSA group showed lower LFC (35.9 ± 16.8 vs. 49.7 ± 21.3, p=0.010) than OSA group. Unlike higher AHI in RBD with OSA than RBD group (29.1 ± 15.6/hr vs. 3.2 ± 1.6, p<0.001), there was no significant difference in CPC study. Both OSA group and RBD with OSA group showed higher LFC (OSA vs. normal: 49.7 ± 21.3 vs. 28.4 ± 13.3, p<0.001, RBD with OSA vs. normal: 35.9 ± 16.8 vs. 28.4 ± 13.2 p=0.035) and lower HFC (OSA vs. normal: 37.5 ± 20.0 vs. 56.2 ± 16.2, p<0.001, RBD with OSA vs. normal: 46.8 ± 20.8 vs. 56.2 ± 16.2, p=0.031) when compared with normal control group, respectively. Conclusions: In terms of autonomic-respiratory interaction, RBD with OSA showed similar CPC profile (higher LFC and lower HFC than normal) to OSA group but less severe than pure OSA group. It suggests that RBD may have a protective effect on OSA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停伴和不伴快速眼动睡眠行为障碍的电生理差异:心肺耦合分析
目的:虽然快速眼动行为障碍(RBD)和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSA)具有不同的病理生理,但RBD合并OSA患者的睡眠似乎比OSA患者更稳定,并通过心肺耦合(CPC)方法对其进行验证。方法:收集138例OSA (AHI≥15)、RBD伴OSA (AHI≥15)、RBD、正常对照(N=32、26、29、51)患者的多导睡眠图(PSG)资料。在合并OSA的RBD和单纯OSA患者之间进行病例对照研究,共招募年龄、AHI和BMI相匹配的OSA对照者32例。使用Rem Logic公司的CPC分析仪获得CPC参数。CPC分析的睡眠频谱显示了睡眠期间稳定潮气量[高频耦合(HFC), 0.1 ~ 0.4 Hz]和波动潮气量[低频耦合(LFC), 0.01 ~ 0.1 Hz]的百分比。结果:虽然RBD合并OSA组与OSA组的呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)差异无统计学意义(AHI 29.1±15.6/hr vs. 34.1±18.9,p=0.332),但CPC测量值差异有统计学意义。RBD-OSA组LFC(35.9±16.8∶49.7±21.3,p=0.010)低于OSA组。与RBD合并OSA组AHI高于RBD组(29.1±15.6/hr vs. 3.2±1.6,p<0.001)不同,CPC研究中无显著差异。与正常对照组相比,OSA组和RBD合并OSA组LFC升高(OSA组与正常组相比:49.7±21.3比28.4±13.3,p<0.001, RBD合并OSA组与正常组相比:35.9±16.8比28.4±13.2 p=0.035), HFC降低(OSA组与正常组相比:37.5±20.0比56.2±16.2,p<0.001, RBD合并OSA组与正常组相比:46.8±20.8比56.2±16.2,p=0.031)。结论:在自主呼吸相互作用方面,RBD合并OSA的CPC特征与OSA组相似(LFC高于正常,HFC低于正常),但低于单纯OSA组。提示RBD可能对OSA有保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Strategies to Engage Blacks in Sleep Medicine: Lessons Learned from Three Studies Applying Community-Based Participatory Research Principles. Health Consequences of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Effect Of Metabolically Healthy Obesity In Male Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea The Awakening Futures Sound Positive! Commentary On The Efficacy For Audio To Counteract Sleep Inertia This Nested Case-Control Study Revealed That Patients With Obesity Experienced More Severe OSA Than Did Those With NASD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1