Integrating historical and moral consciousness in history teaching

Mia Silfver, Liisa Myyry
{"title":"Integrating historical and moral consciousness in history teaching","authors":"Mia Silfver, Liisa Myyry","doi":"10.52289/hej9.203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to explore historical perspective-taking from a social psychological perspective and reflect on the role of social identities and conceptions of human nature in perspective-taking. The sample consisted of 160 Year 9 students in Finland who responded to a historical perspective-taking task based on an edited excerpt from the book Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland (Browning, 1999). Based on qualitative content analysis, four types of answers were identified: all groups have the potential for good and evil; in-group is morally superior; lessons learned from history; and in the future similar situation would be possible. Social identity as an in-group – out-group distinction was essential in the responses as well as moral and historical empathy. Our empirical data shows that many students are willing and able to reflect on complex ethical questions on history lessons, and therefore we suggest that open discussions and consideration of different perspectives should be encouraged in history teaching. In addition, connecting historical topics to current day issues would help students to recognize the patterns of thinking that may lead to intergroup conflicts and violence.","PeriodicalId":53851,"journal":{"name":"Historical Encounters-A Journal of Historical Consciousness Historical Cultures and History Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Encounters-A Journal of Historical Consciousness Historical Cultures and History Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52289/hej9.203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore historical perspective-taking from a social psychological perspective and reflect on the role of social identities and conceptions of human nature in perspective-taking. The sample consisted of 160 Year 9 students in Finland who responded to a historical perspective-taking task based on an edited excerpt from the book Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland (Browning, 1999). Based on qualitative content analysis, four types of answers were identified: all groups have the potential for good and evil; in-group is morally superior; lessons learned from history; and in the future similar situation would be possible. Social identity as an in-group – out-group distinction was essential in the responses as well as moral and historical empathy. Our empirical data shows that many students are willing and able to reflect on complex ethical questions on history lessons, and therefore we suggest that open discussions and consideration of different perspectives should be encouraged in history teaching. In addition, connecting historical topics to current day issues would help students to recognize the patterns of thinking that may lead to intergroup conflicts and violence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史教学中历史意识与道德意识的融合
本研究旨在从社会心理学的角度探讨历史视角的采用,并反思社会认同和人性观念在视角采用中的作用。样本由芬兰的160名九年级学生组成,他们根据《普通人:后备警察101营和波兰的最终解决方案》(布朗宁,1999年)一书的编辑节选,对历史观点进行了回答。 根据定性内容分析,确定了四种类型的答案:所有群体都有善良和邪恶的潜力;内群体在道德上更优越;从历史中吸取的教训;在未来类似的情况是可能的。社会认同作为群体内和群体外的区别,在回答中以及道德和历史共情中都是必不可少的。我们的经验数据表明,许多学生愿意并且能够在历史课上反思复杂的伦理问题,因此我们建议在历史教学中鼓励公开讨论和考虑不同的观点。此外,将历史话题与当今问题联系起来将有助于学生认识到可能导致群体间冲突和暴力的思维模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
18
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Historical Encounters is a blind peer-reviewed, open access, interdsiciplinary journal dedicated to the empirical and theoretical study of: historical consciousness (how we experience the past as something alien to the present; how we understand and relate, both cognitively and affectively, to the past; and how our historically-constituted consciousness shapes our understanding and interpretation of historical representations in the present and influences how we orient ourselves to possible futures); historical cultures (the effective and affective relationship that a human group has with its own past; the agents who create and transform it; the oral, print, visual, dramatic, and interactive media representations by which it is disseminated; the personal, social, economic, and political uses to which it is put; and the processes of reception that shape encounters with it); history education (how we know, teach, and learn history through: schools, universities, museums, public commemorations, tourist venues, heritage sites, local history societies, and other formal and informal settings). Submissions from across the fields of public history, history didactics, curriculum & pedagogy studies, cultural studies, narrative theory, and historical theory fields are all welcome.
期刊最新文献
Democracy is opposed to dictatorship: Danish Holocaust memory and the didactic practices of Danish history teachers Writing to learn history: intertextuality in secondary school and university students in Chile Using history to protect children from extremist ideologies: The example of Noor Magazine in Egypt Representation of political conflicts in history textbooks Using historical evidence: The semantic profiles of Ancient History in senior secondary school
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1