Social Media and Political Communication: Studying the Interactive Component

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-10 DOI:10.29333/ejecs/1112
T. Nguyen, Olga Zhurkina, Trung Bui, K. Sokolovskiy
{"title":"Social Media and Political Communication: Studying the Interactive Component","authors":"T. Nguyen, Olga Zhurkina, Trung Bui, K. Sokolovskiy","doi":"10.29333/ejecs/1112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study purpose is to examine the measure of popularity of separate interactive components of political discourse delivery through social media in the modern Russian Federation. The research methodology builds on an empirical approach through a door-to-door survey. It involved a total number of 1,000 residents of Moscow, the Russian Federation. Respondents were divided into 5 groups of 200 people. They had to choose one of the following types of social media as the most frequently used: social networks, online video platforms (OVPs), blogs, and messengers. Accordingly, the research results demonstrated that social networks are the most popular (53.4%) among study participants. Less number of respondents (19%) consider messengers effective, 15.4% of study participants find video hosting the most significant type of social media, and only 12.2% believe that blogs are the most effective among others. Furthermore, the following factors determined the interactive component of political discourse in social media: the involvement of respondents regarding the participation in online voting, commenting and reposting content (48%), maintaining a blog with a political intent (34%), and refusal to participate in political dialogue (18%). The research results may contribute to further study regarding the behavioral features of media platform users and ways to establish communication between government structures and the public. It may also grant improving the methods of psychological influence on the citizen worldview within political science. The research has a practical significance as the results obtained may facilitate lobbying the interests of political subjects and develop campaigning activities.","PeriodicalId":37174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study purpose is to examine the measure of popularity of separate interactive components of political discourse delivery through social media in the modern Russian Federation. The research methodology builds on an empirical approach through a door-to-door survey. It involved a total number of 1,000 residents of Moscow, the Russian Federation. Respondents were divided into 5 groups of 200 people. They had to choose one of the following types of social media as the most frequently used: social networks, online video platforms (OVPs), blogs, and messengers. Accordingly, the research results demonstrated that social networks are the most popular (53.4%) among study participants. Less number of respondents (19%) consider messengers effective, 15.4% of study participants find video hosting the most significant type of social media, and only 12.2% believe that blogs are the most effective among others. Furthermore, the following factors determined the interactive component of political discourse in social media: the involvement of respondents regarding the participation in online voting, commenting and reposting content (48%), maintaining a blog with a political intent (34%), and refusal to participate in political dialogue (18%). The research results may contribute to further study regarding the behavioral features of media platform users and ways to establish communication between government structures and the public. It may also grant improving the methods of psychological influence on the citizen worldview within political science. The research has a practical significance as the results obtained may facilitate lobbying the interests of political subjects and develop campaigning activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体与政治传播:互动成分研究
本研究的目的是考察现代俄罗斯联邦通过社交媒体进行政治话语传递的独立互动成分的受欢迎程度。研究方法建立在通过上门调查的实证方法上。它涉及俄罗斯联邦莫斯科总共1 000名居民。受访者被分为5组,每组200人。他们必须从以下最常用的社交媒体类型中选择一种:社交网络、在线视频平台、博客和信使。因此,研究结果表明,社交网络在研究参与者中最受欢迎(53.4%)。较少的受访者(19%)认为信使有效,15.4%的研究参与者认为视频托管是最重要的社交媒体类型,只有12.2%的人认为博客是最有效的。此外,以下因素决定了社交媒体中政治话语的互动成分:受访者参与在线投票、评论和转发内容(48%)、维护带有政治意图的博客(34%)以及拒绝参与政治对话(18%)。研究结果有助于进一步研究媒体平台用户的行为特征以及政府机构与公众之间建立沟通的方式。这也可能有助于在政治科学中改进对公民世界观的心理影响的方法。本研究具有一定的现实意义,因为所得结果可以促进政治主体的利益游说,开展竞选活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies
Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Factors of Ethnic Distance: A Systematic Scoping Review Effects of Language Learning Strategies on Teaching Toponyms and Folk Geography Terms in Kazakh and Nogai Languages The Development of Casta Painting as Visual Genre in New Spain and the Production of Ethnoracial Stereotypes Civil Identity of Young Kazakhstanis in the Context of the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict Navigating Racialisation and Whiteness: British Turks’ Struggles for Belonging in Multiscale Public Spaces within the UK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1