Influence of National Senior Certificate Examinations on classroom practice: Experienced teachers’ pedagogical choices in teaching chemical equilibrium

IF 0.7 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH South African Journal of Education Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.15700/saje.v42ns1a1982
Lebala Kolobe, Paul Hobden
{"title":"Influence of National Senior Certificate Examinations on classroom practice: Experienced teachers’ pedagogical choices in teaching chemical equilibrium","authors":"Lebala Kolobe, Paul Hobden","doi":"10.15700/saje.v42ns1a1982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learners who pass the South African National Senior Certificate (NSC) physical sciences examination generally show a weak conceptual understanding of chemistry at university. This inconsistency was investigated by examining strategies used in the teaching of chemical equilibrium in schools. A combination of on-site observations, journaling and teacher interviews was used in a survey of 4 teachers in 3 well-resourced schools whose learners regularly achieve good results in the subject. In this article we argue that, whereas the study reported on here revealed a high degree of consistency in basic concept teaching approaches calculated to help learners pass the NSC examination, focus on the examination comes at the expense of in-depth exploration of concepts. We found that Grade 12 chemistry teachers value learners’ success in the NSC examination more than their understanding of concepts and ability to use those concepts beyond the examination. Reasons for, as well as consequences of this strategic choice were identified and are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47261,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v42ns1a1982","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Learners who pass the South African National Senior Certificate (NSC) physical sciences examination generally show a weak conceptual understanding of chemistry at university. This inconsistency was investigated by examining strategies used in the teaching of chemical equilibrium in schools. A combination of on-site observations, journaling and teacher interviews was used in a survey of 4 teachers in 3 well-resourced schools whose learners regularly achieve good results in the subject. In this article we argue that, whereas the study reported on here revealed a high degree of consistency in basic concept teaching approaches calculated to help learners pass the NSC examination, focus on the examination comes at the expense of in-depth exploration of concepts. We found that Grade 12 chemistry teachers value learners’ success in the NSC examination more than their understanding of concepts and ability to use those concepts beyond the examination. Reasons for, as well as consequences of this strategic choice were identified and are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家高级证书考试对课堂实践的影响:经验丰富的教师在化学平衡教学中的教学选择
通过南非国家高级证书(NSC)物理科学考试的学生在大学里通常对化学的概念理解较弱。通过考察学校化学平衡教学中使用的策略来调查这种不一致性。采用现场观察、日记和教师访谈相结合的方法,对3所资源充足的学校的4名教师进行了调查,这些学校的学生经常在该科目上取得良好成绩。在这篇文章中,我们认为,尽管这里报道的研究表明,为了帮助学习者通过NSC考试,基本概念教学方法具有高度的一致性,但专注于考试是以牺牲对概念的深入探索为代价的。我们发现,12年级的化学老师更看重学习者在NSC考试中的成功,而不是他们对概念的理解和在考试之外使用这些概念的能力。确定并讨论了这一战略选择的原因和后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Education
South African Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Education (SAJE) publishes original research articles reporting on research that fulfils the criteria of a generally accepted research paradigm; review articles, intended for the professional scientist and which critically evaluate the research done in a specific field in education; book reviews, i.e. concise evaluations of books that have recently appeared; and letters in which criticism is given of articles that appeared in this Journal. Indicate the relevance of the study for education research where the education system is characterised by transformation, and/or an emerging economy/development state, and/or scarce resources. Research articles of localised content, i.e. of interest only to specific areas or specialists and which would not appeal to the broader readership of the Journal, should preferably not be submitted for consideration by the Editorial Committee. Ethical considerations: A brief narrative account/description of ethical issues/aspects should be included in articles that report on empirical findings.
期刊最新文献
Setting up classroom libraries in rural areas: The case of Mogodumo circuit in Limpopo Obstacles to critical thinking: A qualitative study on secondary school learners in Masvingo, Zimbabwe The effect of life-design-based counselling on high school learners from resource-constrained communities Dispositional mindfulness associated with less academic burnout among Muslim students during the COVID-19 pandemic Guidelines for instructional design of courses for the development of self-regulated learning for teachers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1