Comparison of Interrelationship with Site Occupancy, Population Structure and Foraging Ecology of Lesser Whistling Duck (Dendrocygna javanica) Among 10 Wetland Habitats of Paya Indah Wetlands, Peninsular Malaysia

Q4 Multidisciplinary Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology Pub Date : 2020-12-29 DOI:10.33805/2576-8484.186
Z. Mohamed, C MartinsOnwuka, N. Muhammad, E OlaniyiOluwatobi
{"title":"Comparison of Interrelationship with Site Occupancy, Population Structure and Foraging Ecology of Lesser Whistling Duck (Dendrocygna javanica) Among 10 Wetland Habitats of Paya Indah Wetlands, Peninsular Malaysia","authors":"Z. Mohamed, C MartinsOnwuka, N. Muhammad, E OlaniyiOluwatobi","doi":"10.33805/2576-8484.186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protecting ecosystems in the vicinity of rapidly urbanizing areas requires continuous monitoring and assessment. Currently, the extent of occurrence <20,000 km2 combined of Lesser Whistling Duck (LWD) is declining or fluctuating in range size, habitat extent/quality and population size. It is mostly found in either small number or small fragmented locations due to limited source of food variety. Hence, the study aimed to evaluate the interrelationship among site occupancy, population structure and foraging ecology of LWD (Dendrocygna javanica) among 10 wetland habitats in a Paya Indah Wetland (PIW), Peninsular Malaysia. Population analysis indicated that PIW harbored LWD density of 4.66 ± 1.12 birds/ha and relative abundance of 1,234 bird individuals. The highest naïve occupancy (NO=0.80), occupancy (Ψ=0.80 ± 0.18) and detection probability (P=0.98 ± 0.01) was detected for Belibis habitat and the lowest occupancy (Ψ=0.31 ± 0.04) in Kemoning habitat. LWD foraged on vegetation predominantly aquatic plants and as well as small vertebrates. The Akaike Information Criteria indicated that, the LWD had significant relationships with occupancy models (R2=0.93) and positive/strong correlationship with food varieties (R2=0.95). The findings indicated that Belibis wetland habitat harbored the highest LWD in terms of relative abundance and density than the other 10 wetland habitats. This study concludes that the interrelationship of site occupancy, density, and foraging ecology of LWD varied among different habitats.","PeriodicalId":36430,"journal":{"name":"Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33805/2576-8484.186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protecting ecosystems in the vicinity of rapidly urbanizing areas requires continuous monitoring and assessment. Currently, the extent of occurrence <20,000 km2 combined of Lesser Whistling Duck (LWD) is declining or fluctuating in range size, habitat extent/quality and population size. It is mostly found in either small number or small fragmented locations due to limited source of food variety. Hence, the study aimed to evaluate the interrelationship among site occupancy, population structure and foraging ecology of LWD (Dendrocygna javanica) among 10 wetland habitats in a Paya Indah Wetland (PIW), Peninsular Malaysia. Population analysis indicated that PIW harbored LWD density of 4.66 ± 1.12 birds/ha and relative abundance of 1,234 bird individuals. The highest naïve occupancy (NO=0.80), occupancy (Ψ=0.80 ± 0.18) and detection probability (P=0.98 ± 0.01) was detected for Belibis habitat and the lowest occupancy (Ψ=0.31 ± 0.04) in Kemoning habitat. LWD foraged on vegetation predominantly aquatic plants and as well as small vertebrates. The Akaike Information Criteria indicated that, the LWD had significant relationships with occupancy models (R2=0.93) and positive/strong correlationship with food varieties (R2=0.95). The findings indicated that Belibis wetland habitat harbored the highest LWD in terms of relative abundance and density than the other 10 wetland habitats. This study concludes that the interrelationship of site occupancy, density, and foraging ecology of LWD varied among different habitats.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚半岛Paya Indah湿地10个湿地生境中小鸣鸭(Dendrocygna javanica)与栖息地占用、种群结构和觅食生态的相关性比较
保护快速城市化地区附近的生态系统需要持续的监测和评估。目前,小笛鸭(LWD)的发生范围<20000 km2,在范围大小、栖息地范围/质量和种群规模方面正在下降或波动。由于食物种类有限,它大多出现在数量较少或零散的地方。因此,本研究旨在评估马来西亚半岛巴雅因达湿地(PIW)10个湿地栖息地中爪哇松毛虫(Dendrocygna javanica)的栖息地占用率、种群结构和觅食生态之间的相互关系。种群分析表明,PIW的LWD密度为4.66±1.12只/公顷,相对丰度为1234只。Belibis栖息地的天真占有率(NO=0.80)、占有率(Ψ=0.80±0.18)和检测概率(P=0.98±0.01)最高,Kemoning栖息地的占有率最低(Ψ=0.31±0.04)。LWD主要以水生植物和小型脊椎动物为食。Akaike信息标准表明,LWD与占用模型有显著关系(R2=0.93),与食物品种有正/强相关性(R2=0.95)。研究结果表明,Belibis湿地栖息地的LWD在相对丰度和密度方面高于其他10个湿地栖息地。本研究的结论是,LWD的场地占用率、密度和觅食生态的相互关系在不同的栖息地之间存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How does artificial intelligence affect the business context? A bibliometric analysis The impact of technology absorption capacity on competitive advantage in Vietnamese small and medium enterprises Evaluating the effect of using augmented reality (Metaverse) on improving the teaching and academic performance Morphometric evaluation of guinea pigs (Cavia Porcellus) in Southern Peru The impact of environmental, social, and governance performance on financial performance: Evidence from Japanese companies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1