Assessing productivity and cost of timber harvesting during longleaf pine ecosystem restoration

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY International Journal of Forest Engineering Pub Date : 2022-12-28 DOI:10.1080/14942119.2022.2157184
Jacob Murray, Patrick Hiesl, D. Hagan, R. Baldwin
{"title":"Assessing productivity and cost of timber harvesting during longleaf pine ecosystem restoration","authors":"Jacob Murray, Patrick Hiesl, D. Hagan, R. Baldwin","doi":"10.1080/14942119.2022.2157184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Timber harvesting operations are increasingly used to restore sensitive habitats such as longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) ecosystems. However, logging companies are often functionally limited by operational costs and site-specific productivity potential. By employing a time study, this project quantified the cost and productivity of a two-person logging crew using conventional equipment in a South Carolina southern pine timber harvest used to restore a longleaf pine savanna ecosystem. Our study found that the feller-buncher, grapple skidder, and knuckle-boom loader produced, on average, 60.7, 23.6, and 45.2 tonnes per Productive Machine Hour (PMH), respectively. When the knuckle-boom loader was exclusively loading log trucks, productivity increased to 48.4 tonnes per PMH. Additionally, a machine rate analysis found that the total cost for each machine was 108.83 USD, 122.92 USD, and 121.25 USD per PMH, respectively, with a total per tonne cost of cutting, skidding, and loading amounting to 9.68 USD. Our findings indicate that restoration harvesting conducted in this manner under similar environmental conditions and price points may remain profitable for both landowners and logging companies. Moreover, the limitations of operating with a two-person crew resulted in minimal negative effects for both profitability and productivity, making it a viable option for similar restoration operations.","PeriodicalId":55998,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Forest Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Forest Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2022.2157184","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Timber harvesting operations are increasingly used to restore sensitive habitats such as longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) ecosystems. However, logging companies are often functionally limited by operational costs and site-specific productivity potential. By employing a time study, this project quantified the cost and productivity of a two-person logging crew using conventional equipment in a South Carolina southern pine timber harvest used to restore a longleaf pine savanna ecosystem. Our study found that the feller-buncher, grapple skidder, and knuckle-boom loader produced, on average, 60.7, 23.6, and 45.2 tonnes per Productive Machine Hour (PMH), respectively. When the knuckle-boom loader was exclusively loading log trucks, productivity increased to 48.4 tonnes per PMH. Additionally, a machine rate analysis found that the total cost for each machine was 108.83 USD, 122.92 USD, and 121.25 USD per PMH, respectively, with a total per tonne cost of cutting, skidding, and loading amounting to 9.68 USD. Our findings indicate that restoration harvesting conducted in this manner under similar environmental conditions and price points may remain profitable for both landowners and logging companies. Moreover, the limitations of operating with a two-person crew resulted in minimal negative effects for both profitability and productivity, making it a viable option for similar restoration operations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估长叶松生态系统恢复期间木材采伐的生产力和成本
摘要木材采伐作业越来越多地用于恢复敏感栖息地,如长叶松(Pinus palustris Mill.)生态系统。然而,伐木公司在功能上往往受到运营成本和特定地点生产力潜力的限制。通过采用时间研究,该项目量化了南卡罗来纳州南部松树采伐中使用传统设备的两人伐木队的成本和生产力,该采伐用于恢复长叶松草原生态系统。我们的研究发现,伐捆机、抓斗集材机和转向节臂式装载机的平均每生产机器小时产量分别为60.7、23.6和45.2吨。当转向节臂式装载机只装载原木卡车时,生产率提高到每PMH 48.4吨。此外,机器费率分析发现,每台机器的总成本分别为每PMH 108.83美元、122.92美元和121.25美元,每吨切割、打滑和装载的总成本为9.68美元。我们的研究结果表明,在类似的环境条件和价格点下以这种方式进行的恢复性采伐可能对土地所有者和伐木公司都是有利可图的。此外,由两名船员操作的限制对盈利能力和生产力的负面影响最小,使其成为类似修复操作的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
21.10%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Productivity benchmarks for unguyed excavator-based tower yarders Novel approach for forest road maintenance using smartphone sensor data and deep learning methods Machine learning applications in forest and biomass supply chain management: a review Mechanical site preparation in South Africa: comparing the productivity of pitting machine operators under different site conditions Stem recovery and harvesting productivity of two different harvesting systems in final felling of Pinus patula
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1