Book Review: Tradition and Apocalypse: An Essay on the Future of Christian Belief

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION Irish Theological Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-10-31 DOI:10.1177/00211400221129404e
P. Rosemann
{"title":"Book Review: Tradition and Apocalypse: An Essay on the Future of Christian Belief","authors":"P. Rosemann","doi":"10.1177/00211400221129404e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"divestment, admissions, and curriculum are analyzed. In this context, the book clearly demonstrates that the only ‘control’ that the Catholic Church actually possesses and exercises relates to ownership of property and the characteristic spirit of their schools. This is a necessary and welcome contribution when, as suggested in this book, a potential citizens assembly on the role and place of religion (particularly the Catholic Church) in education and health care looks imminent. Overall, McGraw and Tiernan make a welcome contribution to contemporary discourse in primary education. The book provides a balanced and informed understanding of the politics of primary education and all stakeholders in education will garner much in terms of contemplating what educational reform in primary education might look like into the future. It is a timely contribution when the prospect of a citizen’s assembly seems likely, where the following questions may be asked: What, if any, benefit is there for Irish society in continuing to maintain a plurality of patrons and educational visions in Irish education? Or would it be better to eradicate such plurality of patrons and educational visions, and in their place, provide a singular hegemonic state patronage model where a singular non-denominational educational vision is espoused?","PeriodicalId":55939,"journal":{"name":"Irish Theological Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Theological Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400221129404e","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

divestment, admissions, and curriculum are analyzed. In this context, the book clearly demonstrates that the only ‘control’ that the Catholic Church actually possesses and exercises relates to ownership of property and the characteristic spirit of their schools. This is a necessary and welcome contribution when, as suggested in this book, a potential citizens assembly on the role and place of religion (particularly the Catholic Church) in education and health care looks imminent. Overall, McGraw and Tiernan make a welcome contribution to contemporary discourse in primary education. The book provides a balanced and informed understanding of the politics of primary education and all stakeholders in education will garner much in terms of contemplating what educational reform in primary education might look like into the future. It is a timely contribution when the prospect of a citizen’s assembly seems likely, where the following questions may be asked: What, if any, benefit is there for Irish society in continuing to maintain a plurality of patrons and educational visions in Irish education? Or would it be better to eradicate such plurality of patrons and educational visions, and in their place, provide a singular hegemonic state patronage model where a singular non-denominational educational vision is espoused?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:传统与启示:基督教信仰的未来随笔
对撤资、录取和课程进行了分析。在这种情况下,这本书清楚地表明,天主教会实际上拥有和行使的唯一“控制”与财产所有权和他们学校的特色精神有关。这是一个必要和受欢迎的贡献,正如本书所建议的那样,一个关于宗教(特别是天主教会)在教育和医疗保健中的作用和地位的潜在公民集会迫在眉睫。总的来说,麦格劳和蒂尔南对当代小学教育话语做出了值得欢迎的贡献。这本书对小学教育的政治提供了一个平衡和知情的理解,教育的所有利益相关者将在考虑未来小学教育的教育改革方面获得很多东西。这是一个及时的贡献,当一个公民集会的前景似乎是可能的,在这里可以问以下问题:如果有的话,对爱尔兰社会有什么好处,在爱尔兰教育中继续保持多元的赞助人和教育愿景?或者根除这种多元的资助人和教育愿景,取而代之的是提供一种单一的霸权国家资助模式,在这种模式下,一种单一的非宗派教育愿景得到支持,这样会更好吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Interpreting Mk 5: 25–34 in Solidarity with Women Who Have Experienced Pregnancy Loss Marrying Body and Theology: A Response to Thomas Finegan Book Review: Journeys of the Mind: A Life in History Is Pope Francis’s Social Teaching Post-Cardijn? The Judgment of the Nations: Structural Sin, Social Ontology, and Social Eschatology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1