Waste Siege: The Life of Infrastructure in Palestine by Sophia Stamatopoulou-Robbins (review)

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropological Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1353/anq.2022.0027
Marisa Solomon
{"title":"Waste Siege: The Life of Infrastructure in Palestine by Sophia Stamatopoulou-Robbins (review)","authors":"Marisa Solomon","doi":"10.1353/anq.2022.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T environment is an incoherent imaginary. Highly racialized in its moralistic deployment of good and bad (McKee 2015), clean and dirty (Butt 2020, Resnick 2021), worth preserving or wasted (West 2006, Wolfe 2006), its terms produce colonial schemas and maps that demarcate who is and isn’t deserving of global aid. Improbably suggesting shared culpability for the asymmetric effects of late capitalism’s ongoing destruction (Fortun 2001), colonial environmental imaginaries create geographies of charity in the wake of producing what Katherine McKittrick (2013) and others have called uninhabitable geographies. Yet, the incoherence of “the environment” is a resource for racial capitalism, particularly when settler colonial markers of progress require that some people, land, and communities remain stuck in the past in order to facilitate the “modern” march forward (Solomon 2019). Sophia Stamatopoulou-Robbins’s Waste Siege: The Life of Infrastructure in Palestine works within the incoherence of environmental imaginaries, revealing how their dissonance produces meaning, time, and place in Palestine. Subtended by the toxic materialities of what Rob Nixon (2011) has called environmental slow violence, Stamatopoulou-Robbins’s ethnography of infrastructure offers a different analytic to describe the siege on Palestinian lives: a waste siege. This ethnography asks the reader to see the “disorienting patchwork of military installations” (19) as well as unpredictable yet inevitable encounters with the state (i.e., Israel) and something “state-like” (i.e., the Palestinian Authority) as critical to how waste moves in and through Palestine. From Palestinian domestic waste practices and experiences with disposable","PeriodicalId":51536,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Quarterly","volume":"95 1","pages":"493 - 497"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2022.0027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

T environment is an incoherent imaginary. Highly racialized in its moralistic deployment of good and bad (McKee 2015), clean and dirty (Butt 2020, Resnick 2021), worth preserving or wasted (West 2006, Wolfe 2006), its terms produce colonial schemas and maps that demarcate who is and isn’t deserving of global aid. Improbably suggesting shared culpability for the asymmetric effects of late capitalism’s ongoing destruction (Fortun 2001), colonial environmental imaginaries create geographies of charity in the wake of producing what Katherine McKittrick (2013) and others have called uninhabitable geographies. Yet, the incoherence of “the environment” is a resource for racial capitalism, particularly when settler colonial markers of progress require that some people, land, and communities remain stuck in the past in order to facilitate the “modern” march forward (Solomon 2019). Sophia Stamatopoulou-Robbins’s Waste Siege: The Life of Infrastructure in Palestine works within the incoherence of environmental imaginaries, revealing how their dissonance produces meaning, time, and place in Palestine. Subtended by the toxic materialities of what Rob Nixon (2011) has called environmental slow violence, Stamatopoulou-Robbins’s ethnography of infrastructure offers a different analytic to describe the siege on Palestinian lives: a waste siege. This ethnography asks the reader to see the “disorienting patchwork of military installations” (19) as well as unpredictable yet inevitable encounters with the state (i.e., Israel) and something “state-like” (i.e., the Palestinian Authority) as critical to how waste moves in and through Palestine. From Palestinian domestic waste practices and experiences with disposable
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《废物围城:巴勒斯坦基础设施的生活》,作者:索菲亚·斯塔马托普洛-罗宾斯
环境是一个不连贯的想象。在善与恶(McKee 2015),干净与肮脏(Butt 2020, Resnick 2021),值得保存或浪费(West 2006, Wolfe 2006)的道德部署方面,它高度种族化,其术语产生了殖民模式和地图,划定了谁值得和不值得获得全球援助。令人难以置信的是,殖民时代的环境想象创造了慈善地理,这是在凯瑟琳·麦基特里克(Katherine McKittrick, 2013)和其他人所称的“不适宜居住的地理”产生之后,暗示了对晚期资本主义持续破坏的不对称影响的共同责任(《财富》2001)。然而,“环境”的不一致性是种族资本主义的资源,特别是当定居者的殖民进步标志要求一些人、土地和社区仍然停留在过去,以促进“现代”前进时(Solomon 2019)。Sophia Stamatopoulou-Robbins的《废物围城:巴勒斯坦基础设施的生活》在不连贯的环境想象中工作,揭示了它们的不和谐如何在巴勒斯坦产生意义、时间和地点。在罗布·尼克松(Rob Nixon, 2011)所称的环境缓慢暴力的有毒物质的支持下,斯塔马托波卢-罗宾斯的基础设施人种志提供了一种不同的分析来描述对巴勒斯坦人生活的围困:一种浪费的围困。这本民族志要求读者看到“令人迷惑的军事设施拼凑”(19),以及与国家(即以色列)和“类似国家”(即巴勒斯坦权力机构)的不可预测但不可避免的遭遇,这对废物如何进入和通过巴勒斯坦至关重要。从巴勒斯坦家庭废物的做法和一次性的经验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Since 1921, Anthropological Quarterly has published scholarly articles, review articles, book reviews, and lists of recently published books in all areas of sociocultural anthropology. Its goal is the rapid dissemination of articles that blend precision with humanism, and scrupulous analysis with meticulous description.
期刊最新文献
The Copy Generic: How the Nonspecific Makes our Social Worlds by Scott MacLochlainn (review) Whetū Mārama/Bright Star dir Toby Mills and Aileen O’Sullivan (review) Screen Media, Technological Innovation and the State in Nigeria Language In Culture: Lectures on the Social Semiotics of Language by Michael Silverstein (review) Crazy, Stupid, Lying, Traitors: Eritrean Politics and Extreme Speech Online
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1