Costs and economic impacts of type-1 diabetes from the Dominican patient perspective

A. Martinez, Coral Naomi Vargas Peña, Daniela Crespo Almonte, Nancy Esther Romero Castro, Franklyn Augustín Colón Arias, Sergio Gresse Júnior
{"title":"Costs and economic impacts of type-1 diabetes from the Dominican patient perspective","authors":"A. Martinez, Coral Naomi Vargas Peña, Daniela Crespo Almonte, Nancy Esther Romero Castro, Franklyn Augustín Colón Arias, Sergio Gresse Júnior","doi":"10.21801/PPCRJ.2021.72.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Estimate the economic burden of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the Dominican Republic and its impact on treatment adherence and patients’ quality of life (QoL).\nMaterials and Methods: Cross-sectional observational study about T1D treatment cost and adherence plus patients QoL. The total monthly cost of treatment regimes was calculated through microcosting analysis and correlated with a national minimum wage (NMW) and average household income. Sociodemographic, clinical, treatment adherence, and QoL data were obtained through an online questionnaire. In an exploratory approach, all variables were compared with the categorization of household income.\nResults: Fixed doses (FD) regime has the lowest cost (46% of the NMW) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) the highest (540% of the NMW). The lower household income group had less insurance coverage (P= 0.034), purchased fewer diabetes management supplies for cost-related reasons (P= 0.014), performed less glycemic monitoring (P= 0.016), and had more cost-related factors limiting appropriate treatment and follow-up (P= 0.030). Also, the FD treatment modality predominated in this group, while Multiple Daily Injections and constant subcutaneous insulin injection prevailed in the higher income group (P= 0.005). The QoL mean scores were 31.63 (SD 8.02) in the lower-income group and 32.52 (SD 8.81) in the higher-income one.\nConclusions: T1D has a high monthly economic impact, potentially worsening treatment adherence and QoL, especially in the lower socioeconomic status population. Efforts must be made by the healthcare system to enhance the economic support and management of this disease.\nKEYWORDS: Type 1 diabetes, Microcosting, Dominican Republic, Public Health, Treatment adherence.","PeriodicalId":74496,"journal":{"name":"Principles and practice of clinical research (2015)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Principles and practice of clinical research (2015)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21801/PPCRJ.2021.72.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Estimate the economic burden of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the Dominican Republic and its impact on treatment adherence and patients’ quality of life (QoL). Materials and Methods: Cross-sectional observational study about T1D treatment cost and adherence plus patients QoL. The total monthly cost of treatment regimes was calculated through microcosting analysis and correlated with a national minimum wage (NMW) and average household income. Sociodemographic, clinical, treatment adherence, and QoL data were obtained through an online questionnaire. In an exploratory approach, all variables were compared with the categorization of household income. Results: Fixed doses (FD) regime has the lowest cost (46% of the NMW) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) the highest (540% of the NMW). The lower household income group had less insurance coverage (P= 0.034), purchased fewer diabetes management supplies for cost-related reasons (P= 0.014), performed less glycemic monitoring (P= 0.016), and had more cost-related factors limiting appropriate treatment and follow-up (P= 0.030). Also, the FD treatment modality predominated in this group, while Multiple Daily Injections and constant subcutaneous insulin injection prevailed in the higher income group (P= 0.005). The QoL mean scores were 31.63 (SD 8.02) in the lower-income group and 32.52 (SD 8.81) in the higher-income one. Conclusions: T1D has a high monthly economic impact, potentially worsening treatment adherence and QoL, especially in the lower socioeconomic status population. Efforts must be made by the healthcare system to enhance the economic support and management of this disease. KEYWORDS: Type 1 diabetes, Microcosting, Dominican Republic, Public Health, Treatment adherence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从多米尼加患者的角度看1型糖尿病的成本和经济影响
目的:评估多米尼加1型糖尿病(T1D)的经济负担及其对治疗依从性和患者生活质量(QoL)的影响。材料与方法:T1D治疗费用、依从性与患者生活质量的横断面观察研究。通过微观成本分析计算治疗方案的每月总成本,并与国家最低工资(NMW)和平均家庭收入相关。通过在线问卷获得社会人口学、临床、治疗依从性和生活质量数据。在一种探索性的方法中,所有变量都与家庭收入的分类进行了比较。结果:固定剂量(FD)方案的成本最低(占NMW的46%),持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)的成本最高(占NMW的540%)。家庭收入较低组的保险覆盖率较低(P= 0.034),因费用相关原因购买糖尿病管理用品较少(P= 0.014),进行血糖监测较少(P= 0.016),并且有更多与费用相关的因素限制适当的治疗和随访(P= 0.030)。此外,FD治疗方式在该组中占主导地位,而在高收入组中以多次每日注射和持续皮下注射胰岛素为主(P= 0.005)。低收入组生活质量平均得分为31.63 (SD 8.02),高收入组生活质量平均得分为32.52 (SD 8.81)。结论:T1D具有较高的月度经济影响,可能会恶化治疗依从性和生活质量,特别是在社会经济地位较低的人群中。卫生保健系统必须努力加强对这种疾病的经济支持和管理。关键词:1型糖尿病,微成本计算,多米尼加共和国,公共卫生,治疗依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing transcranial direct current stimulation as a treatment for phantom limb pain: from pilot mechanistic studies to large clinical studies. Enhancing Dissemination and Understanding in Clinical Research Protocols: Optimizing Visual Communication in a Phantom Limb Pain Clinical Trial. Physical Conditioning, Obesity and Fibromyalgia: Causal Relationship or Confounding? Editorial - Seeking Brain Homeostatic Compensatory Mechanisms for Pain Control. XIV International Symposium of Neuromodulation: Conference Abstracts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1