‘deep wounds… left… in hearts and minds’: South African Public History

IF 0.5 Q1 HISTORY Public History Review Pub Date : 2018-01-04 DOI:10.5130/PHRJ.V24I0.5781
J. Wells
{"title":"‘deep wounds… left… in hearts and minds’: South African Public History","authors":"J. Wells","doi":"10.5130/PHRJ.V24I0.5781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public history practise in South Africa holds out much promise of further things to come. It can close the gulf between history and heritage. This chapter argues that the role of the public historian should not be conflated with the dynamics of the heritage sector, but suggests how trained academics can indeed put their skills to work in a society that is passionately interested in understanding itself and how its pasts created the present. The student movement sharply raised the image of universities in crisis, requiring a whole new, relevant curriculum and rethinking the ways that universities relate to their publics. Public historians can work towards creating invented spaces for co-production of knowledge, moving beyond the traditional oral history interview. The divide between academia and communities is huge and needs to be constantly tackled, providing access to the secluded information of the professional world. I suggest that due to their privileged place in society, many historians have been unable or unwilling to engage with the recovery agenda – the massive need for affirmation of African identity, capacity and culture. A handful of dedicated public historians do not fit this mould and have been exemplary in rolling up their sleeves and boldly engaging with the messy complications of dealing with non-academic communities to produce new forms of historical knowledge, based on inclusiveness.","PeriodicalId":41934,"journal":{"name":"Public History Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5130/PHRJ.V24I0.5781","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5130/PHRJ.V24I0.5781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Public history practise in South Africa holds out much promise of further things to come. It can close the gulf between history and heritage. This chapter argues that the role of the public historian should not be conflated with the dynamics of the heritage sector, but suggests how trained academics can indeed put their skills to work in a society that is passionately interested in understanding itself and how its pasts created the present. The student movement sharply raised the image of universities in crisis, requiring a whole new, relevant curriculum and rethinking the ways that universities relate to their publics. Public historians can work towards creating invented spaces for co-production of knowledge, moving beyond the traditional oral history interview. The divide between academia and communities is huge and needs to be constantly tackled, providing access to the secluded information of the professional world. I suggest that due to their privileged place in society, many historians have been unable or unwilling to engage with the recovery agenda – the massive need for affirmation of African identity, capacity and culture. A handful of dedicated public historians do not fit this mould and have been exemplary in rolling up their sleeves and boldly engaging with the messy complications of dealing with non-academic communities to produce new forms of historical knowledge, based on inclusiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非公共历史
南非的公共历史实践为未来的发展提供了很多希望。它可以弥合历史与遗产之间的鸿沟。这一章认为,公共历史学家的角色不应该与遗产部门的动态混为一谈,但建议训练有素的学者如何在一个热衷于了解自身以及过去如何创造现在的社会中发挥他们的技能。学生运动极大地提升了处于危机中的大学的形象,要求制定全新的、相关的课程,并重新思考大学与公众的关系。公共历史学家可以致力于创造共同生产知识的发明空间,超越传统的口述历史采访。学术界和社区之间的鸿沟是巨大的,需要不断解决,为专业领域提供隐蔽的信息。我认为,由于他们在社会中的特殊地位,许多历史学家无法或不愿参与复兴议程——确认非洲身份、能力和文化的巨大需求。少数敬业的公共历史学家并不符合这种模式,他们卷起袖子,大胆地与非学术团体打交道,以包容性为基础,创造出新的历史知识形式,堪称典范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Memorial Afterlives of Online Crowdsourcing A New Zeal for History: For a New International Public History Public History, National Museums and Transnational History Prosuming History in China: a Paradigm Shift
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1