The Role of Quasi-Courts in Controlling the Legality of Public Administration: Prerequisites for Systematisation of Pre-Trial Tax Dispute Resolution in Lithuania

Eglė Bilevičiūtė, B. Pranevičienė
{"title":"The Role of Quasi-Courts in Controlling the Legality of Public Administration: Prerequisites for Systematisation of Pre-Trial Tax Dispute Resolution in Lithuania","authors":"Eglė Bilevičiūtė, B. Pranevičienė","doi":"10.13165/j.icj.2020.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many countries today, the practice of establishment, a kind of hybrid of the judiciary and public administration, and the so-called quasi-courts - various commissions, tribunals, etc., have recently become common practice of administrative justice functions implementation not only in courts, but also in quasi-courts. Proceedings in such institutions are commonly referred to as quasi-judicial; as the administration of administrative justice in quasi-courts follows, a procedure similar to those in administrative courts and ensuring of the basic principles of judicial proceedings, e.g. the principle of legality, the principle of the right to be heard, and so on. The aim of the authors' research is to reveal the preconditions for the systematization of quasi-judicial control of the legality of the activities of public administration entities and the settlement of tax disputes in Lithuania. To achieve the goal, the following tasks were singled out: 1) to present the concept of quasi-court and to reveal the essential characteristics of quasi-court; 2) to disclose the essence of the control of the legality of the subjects of public administration and the possibility of quasi-courts to exercise the control of the legality of the administration; 3) to present a case study: the problems of the status and legal regulation of the Tax Dispute Commission of Lithuania. The main results of the research: the concept and characteristics of quasi-judicial institutions were clarified and the advantages of such institutions and directions of improvement were identified.","PeriodicalId":32140,"journal":{"name":"International Comparative Jurisprudence","volume":"6 1","pages":"178-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Comparative Jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13165/j.icj.2020.12.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In many countries today, the practice of establishment, a kind of hybrid of the judiciary and public administration, and the so-called quasi-courts - various commissions, tribunals, etc., have recently become common practice of administrative justice functions implementation not only in courts, but also in quasi-courts. Proceedings in such institutions are commonly referred to as quasi-judicial; as the administration of administrative justice in quasi-courts follows, a procedure similar to those in administrative courts and ensuring of the basic principles of judicial proceedings, e.g. the principle of legality, the principle of the right to be heard, and so on. The aim of the authors' research is to reveal the preconditions for the systematization of quasi-judicial control of the legality of the activities of public administration entities and the settlement of tax disputes in Lithuania. To achieve the goal, the following tasks were singled out: 1) to present the concept of quasi-court and to reveal the essential characteristics of quasi-court; 2) to disclose the essence of the control of the legality of the subjects of public administration and the possibility of quasi-courts to exercise the control of the legality of the administration; 3) to present a case study: the problems of the status and legal regulation of the Tax Dispute Commission of Lithuania. The main results of the research: the concept and characteristics of quasi-judicial institutions were clarified and the advantages of such institutions and directions of improvement were identified.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
准法院在控制公共行政合法性中的作用:立陶宛审前税务争议解决制度化的先决条件
在今天的许多国家,设立的做法,一种司法和公共行政的混合,以及所谓的准法院-各种委员会,法庭等,最近已成为行政司法职能的普遍做法,不仅在法院,而且在准法院执行。这类机构的诉讼程序通常被称为准司法程序;准法院的行政司法遵循的是与行政法院类似的程序,确保司法程序的基本原则,如合法性原则、知情权原则等。作者的研究目的是揭示立陶宛对公共行政实体活动合法性的准司法控制系统化和税收纠纷解决的先决条件。为实现这一目标,本文提出了以下任务:1)提出准法院的概念,揭示准法院的本质特征;2)揭示公共行政主体合法性控制的本质和准法院行使行政合法性控制的可能性;3)以个案分析的方式探讨立陶宛税务争议委员会的地位与法律规制问题。研究的主要成果是:明确了准司法机构的概念和特征,明确了准司法机构的优势和完善方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DOMESTIC REFORMS TOWARDS STRENGTHENING THE RULE OF LAW, IN GEORGIA, MOLDOVA, AND UKRAINE THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE: WESTERN AND ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVES SHOULD THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE DEVELOP A POLITICAL QUESTION DOCTRINE CONDITIONS FOR THE BANKRUPTCY OF NATURAL PERSONS: WHICH BALTIC STATE IS THE MOST ATTRACTIVE FOR BANKRUPTCY? WHAT CAN FRANCE LEARN FROM THE CZECH REPUBLIC’S APPROACH TO THE ISSUE OF WEARING (ISLAMIC) RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1