OPTIMIZATION OF SELF-COMPACTING CONCRETE USING RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY

Q4 Earth and Planetary Sciences ASEAN Engineering Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-31 DOI:10.11113/aej.v13.19170
Stephen John C. Clemente, Bernardo A. Lejano, Jaysoon D. Macmac, Jason Maximino C. Ongpeng
{"title":"OPTIMIZATION OF SELF-COMPACTING CONCRETE USING RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY","authors":"Stephen John C. Clemente, Bernardo A. Lejano, Jaysoon D. Macmac, Jason Maximino C. Ongpeng","doi":"10.11113/aej.v13.19170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of predicting models is necessary for an easier and more accurate design mix of self-compacting concrete. Due to the difficulty of test requirements for this type of concrete, a predicting model is useful and can be used to derive the optimum design mix. Different mixtures with varying cement, water, and superplasticizer content were created using a central composite design. A full quadratic model was chosen for all dependent variables considered such as flowability, passing ability, resistance to segregation, 28th-day compressive strength, and flexural strength. Water is the only significant factor that affects all of the rheological properties and compressive strength. Mixtures with high superplasticizer and water content show high segregation and bleeding but yield high compressive strength. Surface response and interaction profiles are developed to help the user of the models in modifying their design mix. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to derive the optimum. The derived optimum design mix is as follows, cement is 483.72kg, 250kg for the water, and 1% for the superplasticizer The optimum design mix of SCC has a desirability of 0.812. The optimum design yield passing slump flow of 609.22mm (>550mm passing), passing l-box of 0.915 (>0.80 passing), -0.962% which can be assumed as equal to zero (<15% passing), 41.79Mpa for compressive strength and 10.33Mpa for flexural strength. The optimum design passes all rheological requirements and has acceptable compressive and flexural strengths. Although the mixture has high water content, this is due to the requirement of rheology. Low superplasticizer content is ideal for limiting segregation and bleeding.","PeriodicalId":36749,"journal":{"name":"ASEAN Engineering Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASEAN Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v13.19170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of predicting models is necessary for an easier and more accurate design mix of self-compacting concrete. Due to the difficulty of test requirements for this type of concrete, a predicting model is useful and can be used to derive the optimum design mix. Different mixtures with varying cement, water, and superplasticizer content were created using a central composite design. A full quadratic model was chosen for all dependent variables considered such as flowability, passing ability, resistance to segregation, 28th-day compressive strength, and flexural strength. Water is the only significant factor that affects all of the rheological properties and compressive strength. Mixtures with high superplasticizer and water content show high segregation and bleeding but yield high compressive strength. Surface response and interaction profiles are developed to help the user of the models in modifying their design mix. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to derive the optimum. The derived optimum design mix is as follows, cement is 483.72kg, 250kg for the water, and 1% for the superplasticizer The optimum design mix of SCC has a desirability of 0.812. The optimum design yield passing slump flow of 609.22mm (>550mm passing), passing l-box of 0.915 (>0.80 passing), -0.962% which can be assumed as equal to zero (<15% passing), 41.79Mpa for compressive strength and 10.33Mpa for flexural strength. The optimum design passes all rheological requirements and has acceptable compressive and flexural strengths. Although the mixture has high water content, this is due to the requirement of rheology. Low superplasticizer content is ideal for limiting segregation and bleeding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用响应面法优化自密实混凝土
为了更容易、更准确地设计自密实混凝土的配合比,有必要开发预测模型。由于这类混凝土的试验要求很困难,因此预测模型很有用,可用于推导最佳设计配合比。使用中心复合材料设计,产生了不同水泥、水和高效减水剂含量的不同混合物。对于所有考虑的因变量,如流动性、通过能力、抗离析性、第28天抗压强度和抗弯强度,均选择了全二次模型。水是影响所有流变性能和抗压强度的唯一重要因素。具有高高效减水剂和高含水量的混合物显示出高偏析和泌水,但产生高抗压强度。开发了表面响应和交互剖面,以帮助模型用户修改其设计组合。采用响应面法(RSM)推导出最优解。得出的最佳设计配合比如下,水泥为483.72kg,水为250kg,高效减水剂为1%。SCC的最佳设计配比为0.812。通过坍落度流量609.22mm(>550mm通过)、通过l-box 0.915(>0.80通过)、-0.962%(可假设为零)(<15%通过)、抗压强度41.79Mpa和抗弯强度10.33Mpa的最佳设计屈服。最佳设计通过了所有流变要求,并具有可接受的抗压和抗弯强度。尽管混合物的含水量很高,但这是由于流变学的要求。超塑化剂含量低是限制偏析和泌水的理想选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ASEAN Engineering Journal
ASEAN Engineering Journal Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊最新文献
ACOUSTICAL ANALYSIS FOR THE LECTURE ROOMS IN UNIMAP ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED EXTRACTION OF STARCH FROM OIL PALM TRUNK: AN OPTIMIZATION BY RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY EVALUATION OF STORM SURGE BEHAVIOR DUE TO DIFFERENT TYPHOON TRACKS AND WIND SPEEDS ALONG THE COAST OF DAGUPAN CITY, LINGAYEN GULF, PHILIPPINES SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOFT CLAY REINFORCED WITH ACRYLONITRILE BUTADIENE STYRENE (ABS) COLUMN CUTTING ANALYSIS ON HORIZONTAL DRIILING USING CUTTING CARRY INDEX, CUTTING TRANSPORT RATIO AND CUTTING CONCENTRATION IN ANNULUS METHOD ON A WELL G FIELD S
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1