Brent Yelton, Shivam Patel, Andrew Shanholtzer, B. Walter, S. M. Jafri
{"title":"Evaluating the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use and impact of social media in the urology residency match: A review of the literature","authors":"Brent Yelton, Shivam Patel, Andrew Shanholtzer, B. Walter, S. M. Jafri","doi":"10.3389/fruro.2022.1005166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media (SoMe) use within healthcare has changed significantly since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. This project highlights recent changes in SoMe use within the field of urology and summarizes how they have impacted the urology residency application and match process. A literature review of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases was performed on March 19th, 2022 for relevant studies regarding the use of SoMe in the American urology residency application and match process. Articles not published in English, published prior to 2019, or focusing on residency matches outside of the United States were excluded. The initial search yielded 202 unique results, of which, after independent review, a total of nine texts were deemed appropriate for analysis. Of the nine sources, six were peer-reviewed articles, two were published conference abstracts which included data, and one was a research letter. These studies consistently found that both urology applicants and residency programs increased their SoMe use following the start of the COVID-19 pandemic as the percentage of programs (26-50% to 51-75%) and percentage of applicants (44% to 80%) participating in SoMe for professional purposes increased from 2018-2019 to 2021. Notably, Twitter was the most popular SoMe platform used. Among urology applicants, 43-61% found SoMe to have the greatest utility in providing information about specific programs. There was also consistency between studies in finding that SoMe use played a minimal role in whether or not a student matched, as only 3-6% of program directors reviewed applicants’ SoMe during the application and match process, while as many as 80% reported that SoMe had no role in the assessment of applicants. With programs continuing to see SoMe as a method of reaching out to applicants, increases in usage will likely continue even after the COVID-19 pandemic ends. In turn, it will become increasingly important for students to be mindful of how and what they post on SoMe. Continuing to analyze and reevaluate the benefits and drawbacks of these SoMe tools will remain important as virtual interactions become increasingly relevant to the field of urology.","PeriodicalId":73113,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fruro.2022.1005166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Social media (SoMe) use within healthcare has changed significantly since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. This project highlights recent changes in SoMe use within the field of urology and summarizes how they have impacted the urology residency application and match process. A literature review of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases was performed on March 19th, 2022 for relevant studies regarding the use of SoMe in the American urology residency application and match process. Articles not published in English, published prior to 2019, or focusing on residency matches outside of the United States were excluded. The initial search yielded 202 unique results, of which, after independent review, a total of nine texts were deemed appropriate for analysis. Of the nine sources, six were peer-reviewed articles, two were published conference abstracts which included data, and one was a research letter. These studies consistently found that both urology applicants and residency programs increased their SoMe use following the start of the COVID-19 pandemic as the percentage of programs (26-50% to 51-75%) and percentage of applicants (44% to 80%) participating in SoMe for professional purposes increased from 2018-2019 to 2021. Notably, Twitter was the most popular SoMe platform used. Among urology applicants, 43-61% found SoMe to have the greatest utility in providing information about specific programs. There was also consistency between studies in finding that SoMe use played a minimal role in whether or not a student matched, as only 3-6% of program directors reviewed applicants’ SoMe during the application and match process, while as many as 80% reported that SoMe had no role in the assessment of applicants. With programs continuing to see SoMe as a method of reaching out to applicants, increases in usage will likely continue even after the COVID-19 pandemic ends. In turn, it will become increasingly important for students to be mindful of how and what they post on SoMe. Continuing to analyze and reevaluate the benefits and drawbacks of these SoMe tools will remain important as virtual interactions become increasingly relevant to the field of urology.
自新冠肺炎大流行开始以来,医疗保健领域的社交媒体(SoMe)使用发生了重大变化。该项目强调了泌尿外科领域SoMe使用的最新变化,并总结了它们如何影响泌尿外科住院申请和匹配过程。2022年3月19日,对PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、Scopus、PsycINFO和Web of Science数据库进行了文献综述,以了解有关SoMe在美国泌尿外科住院申请和匹配过程中使用的相关研究。未以英语发表、在2019年之前发表或关注美国境外居留权匹配的文章被排除在外。最初的搜索产生了202个独特的结果,经过独立审查,共有9个文本被认为适合分析。在九个来源中,六个是同行评审的文章,两个是包含数据的会议摘要,一个是研究信。这些研究一致发现,在新冠肺炎大流行开始后,泌尿外科申请者和住院治疗计划都增加了SoMe的使用,因为从2018-2019年到2021年,出于专业目的参与SoMe的计划百分比(26-50%到51-75%)和申请者百分比(44%到80%)都有所增加。值得注意的是,Twitter是最受欢迎的SoMe平台。在泌尿科申请人中,43-61%的人认为SoMe在提供特定项目的信息方面最有用。研究之间也存在一致性,发现SoMe的使用对学生是否匹配起到了最小的作用,因为只有3-6%的项目主管在申请和匹配过程中审查了申请人的SoMe,而多达80%的人表示SoMe在评估申请人中没有作用。随着项目继续将SoMe视为接触申请人的一种方法,即使在新冠肺炎大流行结束后,使用量也可能继续增加。反过来,对学生来说,注意他们在SoMe上发布的方式和内容将变得越来越重要。随着虚拟交互与泌尿外科领域的相关性越来越大,继续分析和重新评估这些SoMe工具的优点和缺点仍然很重要。