Selecting Singlehood and Creating Community: How Black Women are Reclaiming Agency and Defying Stereotypes

Jonece Layne, Erika Sims, Amber M. Clunie, K. M. Woodson
{"title":"Selecting Singlehood and Creating Community: How Black Women are Reclaiming Agency and Defying Stereotypes","authors":"Jonece Layne, Erika Sims, Amber M. Clunie, K. M. Woodson","doi":"10.1353/bsr.2023.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:As early as 43 years ago, researchers began raising concerns about the deterioration of the Black family unit (Staples, 1979; Spanier & Glick, 1980; Teachman et al., 1987; Bronzaft, 1991; Washington & Newman, 1991; Porter & Bronzaft, 1995; Davis et al., 1997). Many pointed to instability among Black relationships as the root of the problem. There is data to support this theory: marriage rates among Black U.S. adults ages 25 and older dropped from 60% in 1970 to 35% in 2014 (Pew Research Center, 2016). Furthermore, increasing numbers of Black women have indicated their expectation to remain unmarried, from 7% in 1991 to 15% in 1995 (Bronzaft, 1991; Porter & Bronzaft, 1995). A potential contributing factor to this phenomenon can be found in a 1997 study of Black dating professionals' perceptions of their romantic relationships. The participants indicated equal levels of overall satisfaction among men and women, but women reported perceiving less equity and experiencing less ideal relationships than men (Davis et al., 1997). Present day, some of these beliefs and the overall downward trend in Black marriage have persisted. Black women are increasingly viewing marriage as a commitment that should not be pursued with just anyone, regardless of the potential social benefits of the partnership (Awosan & Hardy, 2017; Barros-Gomez & Baptist, 2014; Holland, 2009). Thus, Black singlehood is emerging as a conscious choice and a complex state for Black women across age domains (Moorman, 2020; Mouzon et al., 2020). So why are Black women using their agency to forgo marriage, and what communities are they building to replace the nuclear family?","PeriodicalId":73626,"journal":{"name":"Journal of black sexuality and relationships","volume":"9 1","pages":"22 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of black sexuality and relationships","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/bsr.2023.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:As early as 43 years ago, researchers began raising concerns about the deterioration of the Black family unit (Staples, 1979; Spanier & Glick, 1980; Teachman et al., 1987; Bronzaft, 1991; Washington & Newman, 1991; Porter & Bronzaft, 1995; Davis et al., 1997). Many pointed to instability among Black relationships as the root of the problem. There is data to support this theory: marriage rates among Black U.S. adults ages 25 and older dropped from 60% in 1970 to 35% in 2014 (Pew Research Center, 2016). Furthermore, increasing numbers of Black women have indicated their expectation to remain unmarried, from 7% in 1991 to 15% in 1995 (Bronzaft, 1991; Porter & Bronzaft, 1995). A potential contributing factor to this phenomenon can be found in a 1997 study of Black dating professionals' perceptions of their romantic relationships. The participants indicated equal levels of overall satisfaction among men and women, but women reported perceiving less equity and experiencing less ideal relationships than men (Davis et al., 1997). Present day, some of these beliefs and the overall downward trend in Black marriage have persisted. Black women are increasingly viewing marriage as a commitment that should not be pursued with just anyone, regardless of the potential social benefits of the partnership (Awosan & Hardy, 2017; Barros-Gomez & Baptist, 2014; Holland, 2009). Thus, Black singlehood is emerging as a conscious choice and a complex state for Black women across age domains (Moorman, 2020; Mouzon et al., 2020). So why are Black women using their agency to forgo marriage, and what communities are they building to replace the nuclear family?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择单身和创建社区:黑人女性如何重新获得代理权并挑战刻板印象
摘要:早在43年前,研究人员就开始对黑人家庭单元的恶化表示担忧(Staples,1979;Spanier和Glick,1980;Teachiman等人,1987;Bronzaft,1991;Washington和Newman,1991;Porter和Bronzaft;Davis等人,1997)。许多人指出,黑人关系的不稳定是问题的根源。有数据支持这一理论:美国25岁及以上黑人成年人的结婚率从1970年的60%下降到2014年的35%(皮尤研究中心,2016)。此外,越来越多的黑人女性表示希望保持未婚,从1991年的7%上升到1995年的15%(Bronzaft,1991;Porter和Bronzaft(1995年)。1997年一项针对黑人约会专业人士对其浪漫关系的看法的研究发现了导致这一现象的一个潜在因素。参与者表示,男性和女性的总体满意度水平相同,但女性报告称,与男性相比,她们感受到的公平感和体验到的关系不那么理想(Davis等人,1997年)。如今,其中一些信念和黑人婚姻的总体下降趋势一直存在。黑人女性越来越多地将婚姻视为一种承诺,不应该只与任何人追求,无论伴侣关系的潜在社会效益如何(Awosan&Hardy,2017;巴罗斯-戈麦斯和浸礼会,2014;霍兰德,2009年)。因此,黑人单身正成为跨年龄段黑人女性的一种有意识的选择和复杂状态(Moorman,2020;Mouzon等人,2020)。那么,为什么黑人女性要利用她们的代理权放弃婚姻,她们正在建立什么样的社区来取代核心家庭呢?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"My Mom Would Always Say Pussy Rules the World": A Qualitative Exploration of Southern Black Women's Sexual Messages. Title IX is the Master’s Tool: (Re)conceptualizing Gender and Race Equity in U.S. Education Title Wave: Title IX and How Compromised Abortion Rights can Precipitate Increased College Drop-Out Rates For the Bruhs: The Need for the Racialized and Gendered Support of Black Male College Students Administrator Perceptions of Campus Sexual Assault Policy at an HBCU: A Composite Counterstory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1