Estimation of serum uric acid level in acute ischemic stroke

K. Prashanthi, K. G
{"title":"Estimation of serum uric acid level in acute ischemic stroke","authors":"K. Prashanthi, K. G","doi":"10.47799/pimr.1101.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\n \n Background: The impact of uric acid as a stand-alone risk factor for non-communicable illness has been debated for decades. Strong free radical scavengers like hydroxyl ions, peroxynitrite, and other antioxidants like ascorbic acid are all scavenged by serum uric acid. Neuroprotective agents include uric acid and its connection to ischemic stroke is still debatable. Therefore, the current study tried to evaluate the serum uric levels in acute ischemic stroke patients.\n \n Methods: Patients with acute stroke were included in the trial, thus if rTPA was given to them, it was noted. The patient's baseline blood pressure was taken (in a supine position). All acute stroke patients had blood drawn within 24 hours of admission to assess their lipid profiles, fasting blood sugar levels, and uric acid levels. A neurologist assessed each patient, and computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging were used to distinguish between ischemic stroke and other types of stroke (MRI).\n \n Results: Serum UA levels were found to be significantly higher in stroke patients, with 77.5 percent of patients having high levels (>6 mg/dL) compared to 30.0 percent of controls. When compared to the controls, the mean serum UA level in patients was considerably higher (p=0.0212). Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between serum UA levels and outcome. Independent of other prognostic criteria, patients with high serum UA levels had a significantly worse outcome.\n \n Conclusion: A significant relationship exists between high serum UA levels and ischemic stroke, stroke subtypes (excluding lacunar stroke), and poor outcomes. Finding and managing modifiable risk factors for stroke has advanced quite a bit. Hyperuricemia could be therapeutically targeted in the same manner that other risk factors, such as dyslipidemia and blood pressure, are regularly treated after stroke.","PeriodicalId":30624,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives In Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives In Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47799/pimr.1101.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: The impact of uric acid as a stand-alone risk factor for non-communicable illness has been debated for decades. Strong free radical scavengers like hydroxyl ions, peroxynitrite, and other antioxidants like ascorbic acid are all scavenged by serum uric acid. Neuroprotective agents include uric acid and its connection to ischemic stroke is still debatable. Therefore, the current study tried to evaluate the serum uric levels in acute ischemic stroke patients. Methods: Patients with acute stroke were included in the trial, thus if rTPA was given to them, it was noted. The patient's baseline blood pressure was taken (in a supine position). All acute stroke patients had blood drawn within 24 hours of admission to assess their lipid profiles, fasting blood sugar levels, and uric acid levels. A neurologist assessed each patient, and computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging were used to distinguish between ischemic stroke and other types of stroke (MRI). Results: Serum UA levels were found to be significantly higher in stroke patients, with 77.5 percent of patients having high levels (>6 mg/dL) compared to 30.0 percent of controls. When compared to the controls, the mean serum UA level in patients was considerably higher (p=0.0212). Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between serum UA levels and outcome. Independent of other prognostic criteria, patients with high serum UA levels had a significantly worse outcome. Conclusion: A significant relationship exists between high serum UA levels and ischemic stroke, stroke subtypes (excluding lacunar stroke), and poor outcomes. Finding and managing modifiable risk factors for stroke has advanced quite a bit. Hyperuricemia could be therapeutically targeted in the same manner that other risk factors, such as dyslipidemia and blood pressure, are regularly treated after stroke.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性缺血性脑卒中患者血清尿酸水平的测定
背景:尿酸作为非传染性疾病的独立危险因素的影响已经争论了几十年。强自由基清除剂,如羟基离子,过氧亚硝酸盐和抗坏血酸等抗氧化剂都被血清尿酸清除。神经保护剂包括尿酸及其与缺血性中风的关系仍有争议。因此,本研究试图评价急性缺血性脑卒中患者血清尿酸水平。方法:将急性脑卒中患者纳入试验,记录是否给予rTPA治疗。取患者基线血压(仰卧位)。所有急性中风患者均在入院24小时内抽血评估其血脂、空腹血糖水平和尿酸水平。一位神经科医生对每位患者进行评估,并使用计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)来区分缺血性中风和其他类型的中风。结果:中风患者的血清UA水平明显较高,77.5%的患者血清UA水平较高(6mg /dL),而对照组的这一比例为30.0%。与对照组相比,患者的平均血清UA水平明显高于对照组(p=0.0212)。采用多元logistic回归分析确定血清UA水平与预后之间的关系。独立于其他预后标准,血清UA水平高的患者预后明显较差。结论:高血清尿酸水平与缺血性脑卒中、脑卒中亚型(不包括腔隙性脑卒中)和不良预后之间存在显著关系。发现和管理可改变的中风危险因素已经取得了相当大的进展。高尿酸血症可以像其他危险因素(如血脂异常和血压)在中风后常规治疗一样作为治疗目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of peripheral lymph node tuberculosis: a prospective study of 24 cases Histopathological study on the spectrum of various sinonasal lesions Socio-demographic correlates and psychosocial stressors among suicide attempters attending a tertiary care general hospital Radiological study of foramen arcuale: implications for screw insertion via posterior arch for fixation of C1 vertebrae in atlantoaxial instability using plain radiograph Artificial Intelligence and Computational Pathology: A comprehensive review of advancements and applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1