Development and maturity of co-word thematic clusters: the field of linked data

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 0 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Library Hi Tech Pub Date : 2023-07-20 DOI:10.1108/lht-10-2022-0488
Elaheh Hosseini, Kimiya Taghizadeh Milani, Mohammad Shaker Sabetnasab
{"title":"Development and maturity of co-word thematic clusters: the field of linked data","authors":"Elaheh Hosseini, Kimiya Taghizadeh Milani, Mohammad Shaker Sabetnasab","doi":"10.1108/lht-10-2022-0488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis research aimed to visualize and analyze the co-word network and thematic clusters of the intellectual structure in the field of linked data during 1900–2021.Design/methodology/approachThis applied research employed a descriptive and analytical method, scientometric indicators, co-word techniques, and social network analysis. VOSviewer, SPSS, Python programming, and UCINet software were used for data analysis and network structure visualization.FindingsThe top ranks of the Web of Science (WOS) subject categorization belonged to various fields of computer science. Besides, the USA was the most prolific country. The keyword ontology had the highest frequency of co-occurrence. Ontology and semantic were the most frequent co-word pairs. In terms of the network structure, nine major topic clusters were identified based on co-occurrence, and 29 thematic clusters were identified based on hierarchical clustering. Comparisons between the two clustering techniques indicated that three clusters, namely semantic bioinformatics, knowledge representation, and semantic tools were in common. The most mature and mainstream thematic clusters were natural language processing techniques to boost modeling and visualization, context-aware knowledge discovery, probabilistic latent semantic analysis (PLSA), semantic tools, latent semantic indexing, web ontology language (OWL) syntax, and ontology-based deep learning.Originality/valueThis study adopted various techniques such as co-word analysis, social network analysis network structure visualization, and hierarchical clustering to represent a suitable, visual, methodical, and comprehensive perspective into linked data.","PeriodicalId":47196,"journal":{"name":"Library Hi Tech","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library Hi Tech","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-10-2022-0488","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis research aimed to visualize and analyze the co-word network and thematic clusters of the intellectual structure in the field of linked data during 1900–2021.Design/methodology/approachThis applied research employed a descriptive and analytical method, scientometric indicators, co-word techniques, and social network analysis. VOSviewer, SPSS, Python programming, and UCINet software were used for data analysis and network structure visualization.FindingsThe top ranks of the Web of Science (WOS) subject categorization belonged to various fields of computer science. Besides, the USA was the most prolific country. The keyword ontology had the highest frequency of co-occurrence. Ontology and semantic were the most frequent co-word pairs. In terms of the network structure, nine major topic clusters were identified based on co-occurrence, and 29 thematic clusters were identified based on hierarchical clustering. Comparisons between the two clustering techniques indicated that three clusters, namely semantic bioinformatics, knowledge representation, and semantic tools were in common. The most mature and mainstream thematic clusters were natural language processing techniques to boost modeling and visualization, context-aware knowledge discovery, probabilistic latent semantic analysis (PLSA), semantic tools, latent semantic indexing, web ontology language (OWL) syntax, and ontology-based deep learning.Originality/valueThis study adopted various techniques such as co-word analysis, social network analysis network structure visualization, and hierarchical clustering to represent a suitable, visual, methodical, and comprehensive perspective into linked data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共词专题聚类的发展与成熟:关联数据领域
目的本研究旨在可视化和分析1900-2021年间链接数据领域知识结构的共词网络和主题集群。设计/方法/方法本应用研究采用了描述性和分析方法、科学计量指标、共词技术和社会网络分析。VOSviewer、SPSS、Python编程和UCINet软件用于数据分析和网络结构可视化。发现科学网(WOS)学科分类的最高排名属于计算机科学的各个领域。此外,美国是最多产的国家。关键词本体具有最高的共现频率。本体论和语义是最常见的共词对。在网络结构方面,基于共现识别了9个主要主题集群,基于层次聚类识别了29个主题集群。两种聚类技术的比较表明,语义生物信息学、知识表示和语义工具三个聚类是共同的。最成熟和主流的主题集群是促进建模和可视化的自然语言处理技术、上下文感知知识发现、概率潜在语义分析(PLSA)、语义工具、潜在语义索引、网络本体语言(OWL)语法和基于本体的深度学习。独创性/价值本研究采用了各种技术,如共词分析、社交网络分析、网络结构可视化和层次聚类,以对链接的数据表示合适、直观、有条理和全面的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Library Hi Tech
Library Hi Tech INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
44.10%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: ■Integrated library systems ■Networking ■Strategic planning ■Policy implementation across entire institutions ■Security ■Automation systems ■The role of consortia ■Resource access initiatives ■Architecture and technology ■Electronic publishing ■Library technology in specific countries ■User perspectives on technology ■How technology can help disabled library users ■Library-related web sites
期刊最新文献
From traditional to emerging technologies in supporting smart libraries. A bibliometric and thematic approach from 2013 to 2022 Digital reading: a bibliometric and visualization analysis Collective impression management and collective privacy concerns in co-owned information disclosure: the mediating role of relationship support and relationship risk Designing an axial code pattern for absorptive capacity of knowledge in academic libraries: examining the effect of individual and organizational learning Depth, breadth and structural virality: the influence of emotion, topic, authority and richness on misinformation spread
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1