The NFT Boom and Bust

IF 0.5 3区 艺术学 0 MUSIC Journal of Popular Music Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1525/jpms.2022.34.4.39
Hannah N. Krasikov
{"title":"The NFT Boom and Bust","authors":"Hannah N. Krasikov","doi":"10.1525/jpms.2022.34.4.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the popularization of digital music downloading and streaming services beginning in 1999 with Napster, artists have struggled to recover financially from the decline of physical album sales. Streaming services like Spotify have been scrutinized for low royalty payments to artists—an issue that was exacerbated over the course of the coronavirus pandemic. Following the successful debut of non-fungible token (NFT) collections by musicians including Grimes, Kings of Leon, and deadmau5 early in 2021, some of the biggest mainstream reporters in music began calling NFTs the future of the music industry. The decentralized funding structure NFTs offered appeared to provide a solution for compensating artists fairly; however, in practice, NFTs have primarily only benefitted musicians of celebrity status. This article provides a brief introduction to non-fungible tokens and examines why they have appealed to musicians. Additionally, it establishes the difference between visual art NFTs and music NFTs by situating the latter within both historical and neoliberal capitalist understandings of musical value. Drawing from evidence demonstrating how NFTs have been used in practice, this essay suggests that by assetizing music, NFTs re-legitimize the undervaluing of musicians by establishing them as productive laborers in technoscientific capitalist societies.","PeriodicalId":43525,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Popular Music Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Popular Music Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/jpms.2022.34.4.39","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since the popularization of digital music downloading and streaming services beginning in 1999 with Napster, artists have struggled to recover financially from the decline of physical album sales. Streaming services like Spotify have been scrutinized for low royalty payments to artists—an issue that was exacerbated over the course of the coronavirus pandemic. Following the successful debut of non-fungible token (NFT) collections by musicians including Grimes, Kings of Leon, and deadmau5 early in 2021, some of the biggest mainstream reporters in music began calling NFTs the future of the music industry. The decentralized funding structure NFTs offered appeared to provide a solution for compensating artists fairly; however, in practice, NFTs have primarily only benefitted musicians of celebrity status. This article provides a brief introduction to non-fungible tokens and examines why they have appealed to musicians. Additionally, it establishes the difference between visual art NFTs and music NFTs by situating the latter within both historical and neoliberal capitalist understandings of musical value. Drawing from evidence demonstrating how NFTs have been used in practice, this essay suggests that by assetizing music, NFTs re-legitimize the undervaluing of musicians by establishing them as productive laborers in technoscientific capitalist societies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NFT的繁荣与萧条
自从1999年Napster开始普及数字音乐下载和流媒体服务以来,艺术家们一直在努力从实体专辑销售的下滑中恢复经济。像Spotify这样的流媒体服务因向艺术家支付的版税过低而受到严格审查,这一问题在冠状病毒大流行期间加剧了。2021年初,Grimes、Kings of Leon和deadmau5等音乐人成功推出了不可替代代币(non-fungible token, NFT),一些音乐界的主流媒体开始将NFT称为音乐产业的未来。nft提供的分散资金结构似乎为公平补偿艺术家提供了一个解决方案;然而,在实践中,nft主要只使具有名人地位的音乐家受益。本文简要介绍了不可替代代币,并分析了它们吸引音乐家的原因。此外,它通过将后者置于历史和新自由主义资本主义对音乐价值的理解中,建立了视觉艺术nft和音乐nft之间的区别。从证明nft如何在实践中使用的证据中,本文表明,通过将音乐资产化,nft通过将音乐家确立为技术科学资本主义社会的生产劳动者,使低估音乐家的行为重新合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Journal of Popular Music Studies is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to research on popular music throughout the world and approached from a variety of positions. Now published four times a year, each issue features essays and reviews, as well as roundtables and creative works inspired by popular music.
期刊最新文献
Sustaining Queer Joy and Potentiality A Non-Expert Response Podcast Reenactments and the Sonics of Fictionalization from Cher to Swift Review: Hip Hop Heresies: Queer Aesthetics in New York City, by Shanté Paradigm Smalls Review: DJ Screw: A Life in Slow Revolution, by Lance Scott Walker
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1