The legitimacy of Tsarist authority over the peoples of Siberia in the late 16th to early 18th centuries

A. S. Zuev, Зуев Андрей Сергеевич, V. Slugina, Слугина Виктория Александровна
{"title":"The legitimacy of Tsarist authority over the peoples of Siberia in the late 16th to early 18th centuries","authors":"A. S. Zuev, Зуев Андрей Сергеевич, V. Slugina, Слугина Виктория Александровна","doi":"10.22363/2312-8674-2021-20-3-340-352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article studies the methods that substantiated the legitimacy of the power of the Russian monarch over the vast territories of Siberia. The context of this study is the Russian political culture of the late 16th to early 18th centuries. Based on information from chronicles as well as diplomatic and administrative documents, the authors identify and systematize the main political, ideological, and legal arguments that were most often used by the Russian government to justify the Tsars’ rule over Siberia. The arguments can be divided into two groups according to the target audience: the first group was intended for conversation with the heads of foreign countries, the second one addressed the Siberian peoples and also the Russian people broadly. In foreign policy, the representatives of the Moscow Tsar emphasized the “antiquity” and the “strength” of the bond between these territories and the Russian state. The diplomats tended to exaggerate the scale of the Russian military, socio-economic, political, and cultural (religious) development of the new territories. At the same time, they were silent about the resistance of the local population to the tsarist servicemen. At home the authorities applied other legal arguments to bolster their legitimacy. In interaction with indigenous populations, the Russian governors and service people usually forced the communities (in the form of an ultimatum) to accept the claim that the Tsar owned the Siberian lands as a fiefdom. With this the socio-political status of the Siberian peoples radically changed: they became subjects to the Russian Tsar, as kholops or yasak-payers. The Russian combatants and colonists, in direct contact with the indigenous population, informed the Siberian peoples about recent government directives and fully identified with the official claim to authority. In the eyes of the Russian population, an additional element was the religious and political idea that the Tsar had been chosen by God, from which followed the duty to expand the Russian Orthodox tsardom.","PeriodicalId":41139,"journal":{"name":"Rudn Journal of Russian History","volume":"20 1","pages":"340-352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rudn Journal of Russian History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8674-2021-20-3-340-352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article studies the methods that substantiated the legitimacy of the power of the Russian monarch over the vast territories of Siberia. The context of this study is the Russian political culture of the late 16th to early 18th centuries. Based on information from chronicles as well as diplomatic and administrative documents, the authors identify and systematize the main political, ideological, and legal arguments that were most often used by the Russian government to justify the Tsars’ rule over Siberia. The arguments can be divided into two groups according to the target audience: the first group was intended for conversation with the heads of foreign countries, the second one addressed the Siberian peoples and also the Russian people broadly. In foreign policy, the representatives of the Moscow Tsar emphasized the “antiquity” and the “strength” of the bond between these territories and the Russian state. The diplomats tended to exaggerate the scale of the Russian military, socio-economic, political, and cultural (religious) development of the new territories. At the same time, they were silent about the resistance of the local population to the tsarist servicemen. At home the authorities applied other legal arguments to bolster their legitimacy. In interaction with indigenous populations, the Russian governors and service people usually forced the communities (in the form of an ultimatum) to accept the claim that the Tsar owned the Siberian lands as a fiefdom. With this the socio-political status of the Siberian peoples radically changed: they became subjects to the Russian Tsar, as kholops or yasak-payers. The Russian combatants and colonists, in direct contact with the indigenous population, informed the Siberian peoples about recent government directives and fully identified with the official claim to authority. In the eyes of the Russian population, an additional element was the religious and political idea that the Tsar had been chosen by God, from which followed the duty to expand the Russian Orthodox tsardom.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
16世纪末至18世纪初沙皇统治西伯利亚人民的合法性
本文研究了证明俄罗斯君主对西伯利亚广大领土的权力合法性的方法。本研究的背景是16世纪末至18世纪初的俄罗斯政治文化。根据编年史以及外交和行政文件中的信息,作者确定并系统化了俄罗斯政府最常用来证明沙皇统治西伯利亚的主要政治、意识形态和法律论点。根据目标受众,辩论可分为两组:第一组旨在与外国元首对话,第二组针对西伯利亚人民和俄罗斯人民。在外交政策方面,莫斯科沙皇的代表强调了这些领土与俄罗斯国家之间纽带的“古老性”和“强度”。外交官们倾向于夸大俄罗斯在新领土的军事、社会经济、政治和文化(宗教)发展的规模。与此同时,他们对当地民众对沙皇军人的抵抗保持沉默。在国内,当局运用其他法律论据来支持他们的合法性。在与土著居民的互动中,俄罗斯统治者和服务人员通常(以最后通牒的形式)迫使社区接受沙皇拥有西伯利亚土地作为封地的说法。西伯利亚人民的社会政治地位因此发生了根本性的变化:他们成为俄罗斯沙皇的臣民,成为kholops或yasak的支付者。俄罗斯战斗人员和殖民者与土著居民直接接触,向西伯利亚人民通报了政府最近的指示,并完全认同官方对权力的主张。在俄罗斯人眼中,另一个因素是宗教和政治观念,即沙皇是上帝选择的,由此产生了扩大俄罗斯东正教沙皇制度的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reorganization of Diplomatic missions of the Russian Empire in North-East China During the Early XX Century: based on Materials from the Foreign Policy Archive of the Russian Empire History of St. Petersburg’s Pavements Familial Relations of Russian Naval Officer N.V. Kopytov: based on Epistolary Sources of 1866-1897 Defensive Social Practices in the History of Russia: the Early Formation of “Cancel Culture” or a Rare Event of the Past? Study of the Fuel Supply to Interior Cities in the Ivanovo and Vladimir Regions during the Great Patriotic War
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1