Design aspects and characterization of hydrogel-based bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting

Q1 Computer Science Bioprinting Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bprint.2023.e00274
Jennika Karvinen, Minna Kellomäki
{"title":"Design aspects and characterization of hydrogel-based bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting","authors":"Jennika Karvinen,&nbsp;Minna Kellomäki","doi":"10.1016/j.bprint.2023.e00274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>3D-bioprinting has become a valid technique for tissue and organ regeneration, as the printing of living cells is allowed while the hydrogel-based ink material provides them mechanical and structural support. Self-healing shear-thinning hydrogel inks can be considered most promising ink materials for extrusion-based bioprinting (EBB), because the ink can be extruded due to the decrease in viscosity under shear, and self-healed after removing the shear, which ensures safe printing of cells and shape fidelity after bioprinting. To achieve the best final bioprinting result, some printing technique, ink material and biological aspects of bioprinting need to be considered. In addition, the versatile characterization of pre- and post-printing properties of the inks helps to improve the final bioprinted constructs. However, despite the great advances in 3D-bioprinting, ink related challenges such as opposing characteristics, and lack of controllable micro-environment, or technological challenges such as the need to increase printing speed and print resolution must be resolved. In terms of ink characterization, more standardization is also needed. In addition, the computational modeling would help to improve the performance of the bioprinted construct. Thus, the future of 3D-bioprinting is going towards larger multifunctional tissue/organ constructs with multi-scale vascularization and innervation. Multiple printing techniques are probably combined, but also completely new techniques are needed. Further, multimaterial printing would enable heterogeneity and gradients to the construct. On the other hand, using 4D-bioprinting, the dynamic nature of complex organs could be added to the construct. By combining bioprinting with microphysiological platforms (tissue- or organ-on-a-chip systems) the development of functional tissues and organs intended for implantation would go forward. The translation of EBB into clinical practice is still in the early stages, but EBB has a great potential in regenerative medicine after the challenges, such as biomimicry, reproducibility or up-scaling related issues have been overcome. In this review, the design aspects related to extrusion-based bioprinting technique, the property requirements for ideal bioink, the biological aspects of 3D-bioprinting, and the characterization of the pre- and post-printing properties of bioinks are presented. Also, the challenges and future prospects of 3D-bioprinting are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37770,"journal":{"name":"Bioprinting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioprinting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405886623000179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

3D-bioprinting has become a valid technique for tissue and organ regeneration, as the printing of living cells is allowed while the hydrogel-based ink material provides them mechanical and structural support. Self-healing shear-thinning hydrogel inks can be considered most promising ink materials for extrusion-based bioprinting (EBB), because the ink can be extruded due to the decrease in viscosity under shear, and self-healed after removing the shear, which ensures safe printing of cells and shape fidelity after bioprinting. To achieve the best final bioprinting result, some printing technique, ink material and biological aspects of bioprinting need to be considered. In addition, the versatile characterization of pre- and post-printing properties of the inks helps to improve the final bioprinted constructs. However, despite the great advances in 3D-bioprinting, ink related challenges such as opposing characteristics, and lack of controllable micro-environment, or technological challenges such as the need to increase printing speed and print resolution must be resolved. In terms of ink characterization, more standardization is also needed. In addition, the computational modeling would help to improve the performance of the bioprinted construct. Thus, the future of 3D-bioprinting is going towards larger multifunctional tissue/organ constructs with multi-scale vascularization and innervation. Multiple printing techniques are probably combined, but also completely new techniques are needed. Further, multimaterial printing would enable heterogeneity and gradients to the construct. On the other hand, using 4D-bioprinting, the dynamic nature of complex organs could be added to the construct. By combining bioprinting with microphysiological platforms (tissue- or organ-on-a-chip systems) the development of functional tissues and organs intended for implantation would go forward. The translation of EBB into clinical practice is still in the early stages, but EBB has a great potential in regenerative medicine after the challenges, such as biomimicry, reproducibility or up-scaling related issues have been overcome. In this review, the design aspects related to extrusion-based bioprinting technique, the property requirements for ideal bioink, the biological aspects of 3D-bioprinting, and the characterization of the pre- and post-printing properties of bioinks are presented. Also, the challenges and future prospects of 3D-bioprinting are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于挤压生物打印的水凝胶生物墨水的设计和表征
3d生物打印已经成为组织和器官再生的有效技术,因为打印活细胞是允许的,而水凝胶墨水材料为它们提供了机械和结构支持。自愈性剪切减薄水凝胶油墨被认为是最有前途的挤出生物打印(EBB)油墨材料,因为油墨在剪切作用下粘度降低,可以挤出,去除剪切后可以自愈,保证了生物打印后细胞的安全打印和形状的保真度。为了达到最佳的最终生物打印效果,需要考虑生物打印的一些打印技术、油墨材料和生物学方面的问题。此外,油墨的印刷前后特性的多功能表征有助于改善最终的生物打印结构。然而,尽管3d生物打印取得了巨大的进步,但墨水相关的挑战,如相反的特性,缺乏可控的微环境,或技术挑战,如需要提高打印速度和打印分辨率,必须解决。在油墨特性方面,也需要更多的标准化。此外,计算建模将有助于提高生物打印结构的性能。因此,3d生物打印的未来将走向更大的多功能组织/器官结构,具有多尺度的血管化和神经支配。多种印刷技术可能结合在一起,但也需要全新的技术。此外,多材料打印将使结构具有异质性和梯度。另一方面,使用4d生物打印,复杂器官的动态特性可以添加到结构中。通过将生物打印与微生理平台(组织或器官芯片系统)相结合,用于植入的功能性组织和器官的开发将向前发展。将EBB转化为临床实践仍处于早期阶段,但在克服了诸如仿生学、可重复性或规模化相关问题等挑战后,EBB在再生医学中具有巨大的潜力。在这篇综述中,介绍了与基于挤压的生物打印技术相关的设计方面,理想生物墨水的性能要求,3d生物打印的生物学方面,以及生物墨水打印前和打印后性能的表征。此外,还讨论了3d生物打印面临的挑战和未来的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bioprinting
Bioprinting Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Bioprinting is a broad-spectrum, multidisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of 3D fabrication technology involving biological tissues, organs and cells for medical and biotechnology applications. Topics covered include nanomaterials, biomaterials, scaffolds, 3D printing technology, imaging and CAD/CAM software and hardware, post-printing bioreactor maturation, cell and biological factor patterning, biofabrication, tissue engineering and other applications of 3D bioprinting technology. Bioprinting publishes research reports describing novel results with high clinical significance in all areas of 3D bioprinting research. Bioprinting issues contain a wide variety of review and analysis articles covering topics relevant to 3D bioprinting ranging from basic biological, material and technical advances to pre-clinical and clinical applications of 3D bioprinting.
期刊最新文献
3D and 4D printed materials for cardiac transplantation: Advances in biogenerative engineering Evolution of toxicity testing platforms from 2D to advanced 3D bioprinting for safety assessment of drugs Robust design optimization of Critical Quality Indicators (CQIs) of medical-graded polycaprolactone (PCL) in bioplotting Recent advances in the development of stereolithography-based additive manufacturing processes: A review of applications and challenges Optimizing biomaterial inks: A study on the printability of Carboxymethyl cellulose-Laponite nanocomposite hydrogels and dental pulp stem cells bioprinting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1