A CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE UNRWA-USA FRAMEWORK FOR COOPERATION (2021-2022) REGARDING PALESTINIAN REFUGEES

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW IIUM Law Journal Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.31436/iiumlj.v30i2.735
Hamza A. K. Salman, Shahrul Mizan bin Ismail, Rohaida Nordin
{"title":"A CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE UNRWA-USA FRAMEWORK FOR COOPERATION (2021-2022) REGARDING PALESTINIAN REFUGEES","authors":"Hamza A. K. Salman, Shahrul Mizan bin Ismail, Rohaida Nordin","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v30i2.735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, issues related to Palestinian refugees have been diminishing in support due to multiple attempts made by the United States and Israel, which include measures to restrict the activities of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNRWA). These attempts escalated when former US President Donald Trump announced a complete suspension of funding for the UNRWA in 2018, plunging the Agency into an unusual financial crisis that harmed the assistance to refugees in its operation areas. However, the current US President Joe Biden announced his intention to resume funding for the UNRWA and, in July 2021, signed a cooperation framework known as \"framework agreement\" but its terms and details were widely rejected by the Palestinians and the general public because of political and security reasons. According to the Agreement, individuals receiving military training under the UNRWA programmes are not eligible for UNRWA health or educational assistance. The framework agreement between the US and the UNRWA tries to change UNRWA's operating mandate without the authorisation of the United Nations General Assembly. Therefore, this article follows a doctrinal analytical approach to both the framework agreement and the UNRWA's operational mandate. It also critically appraises this Agreement in light of international humanitarian law and verifies its impact on the human rights of both beneficiaries and UNRWA workers, including rights to education and freedom of speech. This article concludes that the Agreement violates the norms of public international law by switching the Agency's missions and avoiding the need for an important decision-making process.","PeriodicalId":40704,"journal":{"name":"IIUM Law Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIUM Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v30i2.735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, issues related to Palestinian refugees have been diminishing in support due to multiple attempts made by the United States and Israel, which include measures to restrict the activities of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNRWA). These attempts escalated when former US President Donald Trump announced a complete suspension of funding for the UNRWA in 2018, plunging the Agency into an unusual financial crisis that harmed the assistance to refugees in its operation areas. However, the current US President Joe Biden announced his intention to resume funding for the UNRWA and, in July 2021, signed a cooperation framework known as "framework agreement" but its terms and details were widely rejected by the Palestinians and the general public because of political and security reasons. According to the Agreement, individuals receiving military training under the UNRWA programmes are not eligible for UNRWA health or educational assistance. The framework agreement between the US and the UNRWA tries to change UNRWA's operating mandate without the authorisation of the United Nations General Assembly. Therefore, this article follows a doctrinal analytical approach to both the framework agreement and the UNRWA's operational mandate. It also critically appraises this Agreement in light of international humanitarian law and verifies its impact on the human rights of both beneficiaries and UNRWA workers, including rights to education and freedom of speech. This article concludes that the Agreement violates the norms of public international law by switching the Agency's missions and avoiding the need for an important decision-making process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对近东救济工程处-美国关于巴勒斯坦难民的合作框架(2021-2022年)的批判性评价
最近,由于美国和以色列多次尝试,包括采取措施限制联合国巴勒斯坦难民救济和工程处(近东救济工程处)的活动,与巴勒斯坦难民有关的问题得到的支持越来越少。2018年,美国前总统唐纳德·特朗普宣布全面暂停对近东救济工程处的资助,使该机构陷入罕见的财政危机,损害了对其业务地区难民的援助。然而,现任美国总统拜登宣布有意恢复对近东救济工程处的资助,并于2021年7月签署了一项被称为“框架协议”的合作框架,但由于政治和安全原因,其条款和细节遭到巴勒斯坦人和公众的广泛拒绝。根据《协定》,在近东救济工程处方案下接受军事训练的个人没有资格获得近东救济工程处的保健或教育援助。美国和近东救济工程处之间的框架协议试图在未经联合国大会授权的情况下改变近东救济工程处的运作任务。因此,本文对框架协定和近东救济工程处的业务任务采取理论分析方法。它还根据国际人道主义法批判性地评价这项协定,并核查它对受益者和近东救济工程处工作人员的人权,包括受教育权和言论自由权的影响。该条的结论是,《协定》改变了原子能机构的任务,避免了重要决策过程的需要,违反了国际公法准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
GUESS EDITORS OPTIMISING WAQF LAW FOR EFFECTIVE ADMINISTRATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1949 AND STATE WAQF ENACTMENTS BALANCING THE RIGHT OF GIG ECONOMY WORKERS IN THE CONTEXT OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING THE ISLAMIC LEGAL SYSTEM IN MALAYSIA: CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES A REVIEW OF THE MALAYSIAN JURISPRUDENCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1