Pedagogy and youth civic engagement: Shifting understandings, emergent considerations and persisting challenges

Q3 Social Sciences Citizenship Teaching and Learning Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1386/ctl_00027_1
M. Evans, A. Peterson, M. Fülöp, Dina Kiwan, J. Sim, I. Davies
{"title":"Pedagogy and youth civic engagement: Shifting understandings, emergent considerations and persisting challenges","authors":"M. Evans, A. Peterson, M. Fülöp, Dina Kiwan, J. Sim, I. Davies","doi":"10.1386/ctl_00027_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pedagogies about and for civic engagement are not clearly defined. We consider how these understandings have been constructed and how these pedagogical developments reveal a gradual yet fundamental shift from more transmission-oriented learning intentions and practices to more transformative orientations. We examine how particular broad and interrelated pedagogical considerations and experiences appear to enhance civic engagement learning (e.g. a focus on real-life and relevant political questions and issues, classroom to community, local to global). We review experiences that allow for the practice of different forms of civic engagement; varied ways of knowing and active involvement in the process of constructing knowledge in relation to these political questions and issues rather than simply receiving information passively; and building capacities for decision-making, public issue investigation, ethical thinking, peace-building and conflict management. We recognize that these matters are approached differently in the literature and in classrooms, schools and communities with varying degrees of emphasis and levels of sophistication. We contend that these contrasting approaches and practices reflect differing cultural and historical traditions and contexts, pressures being experienced locally and globally, and the guidance of educational policies and study programmes. The enactment of these developing understandings of civic engagement pedagogy is nominal and uneven in classrooms, schools and community sites within and across countries. Most forms of civic engagement pedagogy for youth tend to occur randomly in their communities, while school-based programmes are limited and most often involved in forms of civic action that are perceived as safe and minimal. We highlight – in the form of questions – some of the persisting challenges that face educators in developing appropriate pedagogies for civic engagement. This work originated from a three-year (2016–19), six-country project, ‘Youth Activism, Engagement and the Development of New Civic Learning Spaces’, undertaken by an international network of researchers (based in Australia, Canada, England, Hungary, Lebanon and Singapore) and funded by a Leverhulme Network Grant. We explore key ideas and issues about the ways in which young people participate in society and discuss what implications there are for education.","PeriodicalId":38020,"journal":{"name":"Citizenship Teaching and Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Citizenship Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl_00027_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Pedagogies about and for civic engagement are not clearly defined. We consider how these understandings have been constructed and how these pedagogical developments reveal a gradual yet fundamental shift from more transmission-oriented learning intentions and practices to more transformative orientations. We examine how particular broad and interrelated pedagogical considerations and experiences appear to enhance civic engagement learning (e.g. a focus on real-life and relevant political questions and issues, classroom to community, local to global). We review experiences that allow for the practice of different forms of civic engagement; varied ways of knowing and active involvement in the process of constructing knowledge in relation to these political questions and issues rather than simply receiving information passively; and building capacities for decision-making, public issue investigation, ethical thinking, peace-building and conflict management. We recognize that these matters are approached differently in the literature and in classrooms, schools and communities with varying degrees of emphasis and levels of sophistication. We contend that these contrasting approaches and practices reflect differing cultural and historical traditions and contexts, pressures being experienced locally and globally, and the guidance of educational policies and study programmes. The enactment of these developing understandings of civic engagement pedagogy is nominal and uneven in classrooms, schools and community sites within and across countries. Most forms of civic engagement pedagogy for youth tend to occur randomly in their communities, while school-based programmes are limited and most often involved in forms of civic action that are perceived as safe and minimal. We highlight – in the form of questions – some of the persisting challenges that face educators in developing appropriate pedagogies for civic engagement. This work originated from a three-year (2016–19), six-country project, ‘Youth Activism, Engagement and the Development of New Civic Learning Spaces’, undertaken by an international network of researchers (based in Australia, Canada, England, Hungary, Lebanon and Singapore) and funded by a Leverhulme Network Grant. We explore key ideas and issues about the ways in which young people participate in society and discuss what implications there are for education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育学与青年公民参与:转变的理解、紧急的考虑和持续的挑战
关于公民参与和公民参与的教学方法没有明确的定义。我们考虑了这些理解是如何构建的,以及这些教学发展如何揭示了从更多以传递为导向的学习意图和实践到更多以变革为导向的渐进而根本性的转变。我们研究了具体的广泛和相互关联的教学考虑和经验如何增强公民参与学习(例如,关注现实生活和相关的政治问题和问题,课堂到社区,地方到全球)。我们回顾了允许实践不同形式的公民参与的经验;在与这些政治问题和议题相关的知识建构过程中,认识和积极参与的各种方式,而不是简单地被动地接受信息;建设决策能力、公共问题调查能力、伦理思维能力、建设和平能力和冲突管理能力。我们认识到,在文学、课堂、学校和社区中,这些问题的处理方式各不相同,强调程度和复杂程度各不相同。我们认为,这些不同的方法和实践反映了不同的文化和历史传统和背景,地方和全球所经历的压力,以及教育政策和学习计划的指导。这些对公民参与教学法不断发展的理解在国家内部和国家之间的课堂、学校和社区场所的实施是有名无实和不平衡的。面向青年的公民参与教学法的大多数形式往往随机出现在他们的社区,而以学校为基础的方案是有限的,而且往往涉及被认为是安全和最低限度的公民行动形式。我们以问题的形式强调了教育工作者在制定适当的公民参与教学法时所面临的一些持续挑战。这项工作源于一个为期三年(2016-19)的六国项目,名为“青年行动主义、参与和新公民学习空间的发展”,由一个国际研究网络(位于澳大利亚、加拿大、英国、匈牙利、黎巴嫩和新加坡)承担,由利华休姆网络资助。我们探讨了年轻人参与社会的方式的关键思想和问题,并讨论了对教育的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Citizenship Teaching and Learning
Citizenship Teaching and Learning Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Citizenship Teaching & Learning is published in partnership with the Children’s Identity and Citizenship in Europe Association (CiCea). Citizenship Teaching & Learning is global in scope, exploring issues of social and moral responsibility, community involvement and political literacy. It is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal that advances academic and professional understandings within a broad characterization of education, focusing on a wide range of issues including identity, diversity, equality and social justice within social, moral, political and cultural contexts.
期刊最新文献
Relationships among teachers’ emotional competences, emotional labour strategies and self-efficacy in moral and character education: A Hong Kong case Transdisciplinary reflections on the occupation of Czechoslovakia in 1968: Didactic use of the protest song in social science education Curriculum for Justice and Harmony: Deliberation, Knowledge, and Action in Social and Civic Education, Keith C. Barton And Li-Ching Ho (2022) Bilingual digital learning in teacher education: Bridge or barrier in the enhancement of shared society? Gender context matters: The hidden gender equality problem of school democracy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1