From sodium-vapour to LEDs: how an outdoor lighting retrofit affects insects in Singapore

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Urban Ecology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1093/jue/juad009
Joanna L. Coleman, Deon Lum, Xinyi Yao
{"title":"From sodium-vapour to LEDs: how an outdoor lighting retrofit affects insects in Singapore","authors":"Joanna L. Coleman, Deon Lum, Xinyi Yao","doi":"10.1093/jue/juad009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the Anthropocene, the planet is warming and global biodiversity, including of insects, is being lost at an unprecedented rate. One largely urban sustainability solution, shifting to energy-efficient, light-emitting diode (LED) bulbs on outdoor lighting, has impacts on insects that are inadequately understood, especially in the tropics and brightly lit cities. Working in Singapore—a highly urbanised and light-polluted tropical city-state—we performed a field experiment to test the hypothesis that newly retrofitted LED lights are more attractive (i.e., detrimental) to insects compared to the high-pressure sodium (HPS) lamps they replace. Instead, our sticky traps, which we mounted on both light types, caught statistically equal numbers of arthropods (individuals and families). Traps on LED lamps also attracted proportionally fewer dipterans and more hemipterans and hymenopterans, but these effects were site-specific. Overall, we found no support for our hypothesis—our findings may reflect differential emissions of ultraviolet wavelengths by both light types and/or the possibility that urban insect assemblages with historic exposure to light pollution may not respond as expected to the retrofit. We caution against extrapolating findings from impact studies to untested contexts and highlight the need for (1) more studies in the rapidly urbanising tropics and (2) field tests of the effectiveness of measures to limit any negative ecological impacts of LED lighting, including other lethal and sublethal effects that we did not assess. We also discuss possible implications for ecosystem services and insect conservation.","PeriodicalId":37022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Ecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jue/juad009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Anthropocene, the planet is warming and global biodiversity, including of insects, is being lost at an unprecedented rate. One largely urban sustainability solution, shifting to energy-efficient, light-emitting diode (LED) bulbs on outdoor lighting, has impacts on insects that are inadequately understood, especially in the tropics and brightly lit cities. Working in Singapore—a highly urbanised and light-polluted tropical city-state—we performed a field experiment to test the hypothesis that newly retrofitted LED lights are more attractive (i.e., detrimental) to insects compared to the high-pressure sodium (HPS) lamps they replace. Instead, our sticky traps, which we mounted on both light types, caught statistically equal numbers of arthropods (individuals and families). Traps on LED lamps also attracted proportionally fewer dipterans and more hemipterans and hymenopterans, but these effects were site-specific. Overall, we found no support for our hypothesis—our findings may reflect differential emissions of ultraviolet wavelengths by both light types and/or the possibility that urban insect assemblages with historic exposure to light pollution may not respond as expected to the retrofit. We caution against extrapolating findings from impact studies to untested contexts and highlight the need for (1) more studies in the rapidly urbanising tropics and (2) field tests of the effectiveness of measures to limit any negative ecological impacts of LED lighting, including other lethal and sublethal effects that we did not assess. We also discuss possible implications for ecosystem services and insect conservation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从钠蒸汽到LED:新加坡户外照明改造如何影响昆虫
在人类世,地球正在变暖,包括昆虫在内的全球生物多样性正在以前所未有的速度丧失。一个主要是城市可持续发展的解决方案,在户外照明中转向节能的发光二极管灯泡,对昆虫的影响还没有得到充分的了解,尤其是在热带和光线明亮的城市。在新加坡这个高度城市化和光污染的热带城市国家工作时,我们进行了一项实地实验,以检验新改装的LED灯与它们所取代的高压钠灯相比,对昆虫更具吸引力(即更有害)的假设。相反,我们在两种光照类型上安装的粘性陷阱捕捉到的节肢动物(个体和家庭)数量在统计上相等。LED灯上的陷阱也相应地吸引了更少的双翅目昆虫,更多的半翅目昆虫和处女膜目昆虫,但这些影响是特定地点的。总的来说,我们没有发现对我们的假设的支持——我们的发现可能反映了两种光类型对紫外线波长的不同发射,和/或历史上暴露于光污染的城市昆虫群落可能不会像预期的那样对改造做出反应的可能性。我们警告不要将影响研究的结果外推到未经测试的环境中,并强调需要(1)在快速城市化的热带地区进行更多研究,以及(2)对限制LED照明的任何负面生态影响的措施的有效性进行实地测试,包括我们没有评估的其他致命和亚致命影响。我们还讨论了对生态系统服务和昆虫保护的可能影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Ecology
Journal of Urban Ecology Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Beyond the metropolis: street tree communities and resident perceptions on ecosystem services in small urban centers in India Comparing fear responses of two lizard species across habitats varying in human impact Perceived and desired outcomes of urban coyote management methods Garbage in may not equal garbage out: sex mediates effects of ‘junk food’ in a synanthropic species Effects of landscape cover and yard features on feral and free-roaming cat (Felis catus) distribution, abundance and activity patterns in a suburban area
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1